• Browser Game Pick: No Longer Subject to Judicial Review (NiallM)
    2 replies, posted
[url]http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/IndependentGaming/~3/w13blTZQ-M4/browser_game_pick_no_longer_su.html[/url]
Up until the very last minute, I thought it might have been [sp]the father[/sp], but at the last minute I realised that [sp]some of Roy Beech's evidence was inconsistent, and chose him instead.[/sp] I have no idea whether I was right or not, and I wouldn't convict one person on that much evidence anyway. [editline]4th August 2011[/editline] I think maybe the point of the game is that [sp]all extra-judicial convictions are equally worthless.[/sp]
[QUOTE=Turnips5;31530917]Up until the very last minute, I thought it might have been [sp]the father[/sp], but at the last minute I realised that [sp]some of Roy Beech's evidence was inconsistent, and chose him instead.[/sp] I have no idea whether I was right or not, and I wouldn't convict one person on that much evidence anyway. [editline]4th August 2011[/editline] I think maybe the point of the game is that [sp]all extra-judicial convictions are equally worthless.[/sp][/QUOTE] I agree. I also guessed for [sp]Roy Beech[/sp], but that [sp] newspaper article with the serial killer[/sp] really messed with me at the end. For a minute I thought I had [sp] caught a serial killer[/sp], but then i read the end. Oh dear. Good game!
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.