no shit
[editline]31st July 2012[/editline]
MOH lost all its worth when it switched from wwii to modern
I wouldn't call it disinterest in MoH specifically as much as I would call it disinterest in modern war FPS games in general.
Hooray for being the only one interested in it!
.. :c
Allied Assault was the shit.
[hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3CRmOLt3Wc[/hd]
[QUOTE=Silikone;37020585]Allied Assault was the shit.
[hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3CRmOLt3Wc[/hd][/QUOTE]
It's funny, the creators of the greatest Medal of Honor game went on to become Infinity Ward. And let's face it, everybody loved CoD 1, 2, and 4
Good. Medal of Honor (2010) was a terrible terrible game, and Warfighter looks equally as bad.
[QUOTE=kevlar jens;37020946]Good. Medal of Honor (2010) was a terrible terrible game, and Warfighter looks equally as bad.[/QUOTE]
I still think most sales are coming from the fact you get a invite for the Battlefield 3 beta
[editline]31st July 2012[/editline]
Which to think of it, will happen again with this one...
Maybe its because MoH nowadays looks almost the same as 4 other different games, like BF3 and MoH from 2010 as said.
It's because it's the same shit over and over, fucking do a innovative game.
God do something like fucking Battlefield 2142, or some shit in the future. It's not hard too design balanced weapons with future shit, my god.
I swear developers have no brain at all. I wish I knew anything about modelling, animations, coding, or anything valuable towards gaming, too try and do something with maybe a small team, but it never will happen.
maybe no one cares about it because it's fucking close quarters battlefield?
What exactly is the point of the new MoH honor games? Is it more direct competition with CoD?
When they decided to revive MoH they could've gone ahead of CoD and do the ''Future Warfare'' theme everyone saw coming years before BOps 2. You know, the perfect chance to give it a new fresh setting and an incentive to play it over the same ol' stuff. BUT NOOOOO, LET'S MAKE IT A MODERN BROWNAN SHOOTAN GOD BLESS 'MURRICA 7 HOURS LONG GAME, BECAUSE WE CAN'T LET SOMEONE ELSE MAKE MONEY
I want this game to be successful.
If EA gets MoH to be a successful CoD competitor, maybe they'll stop trying to implement ideas from CoD into Battlefield.
Even the title screams generic.
"Warfighter", is that really the best you can come up with by now?
Maybe because of this:
[t]http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleimages/randall/fps5.jpg[/t]
IMO MOH(2010) started off pretty good.. but then spiraled out of control.
Didn't help that the 2 days later after the game came out I lost a friend over their in the war. The rangers lead the way mission described pretty much every about him. Took me 2 days if even attempting to make it though that mission just because I couldn't stop crying.
The singleplayer in MOH was ok but it wasn't great. They're seriously just trying to steal as much sales as they can from the FPS market now. Sad to see them putting Greg Goodrich to waste on useless games. (or should I say put to waste on pointless IPs that exist for cheap money only)
I'll play it for the story but mother of god the multiplayer in 2010 was shit
I'm still excited for it and gonna play it.
[editline]1st August 2012[/editline]
I'm happy they're making this because I want it to be different from BF3, it's nice with a change and sometimes its fun to run n gun, you can't always do that in BF3.
[QUOTE=SweFox*;37027260]I'm still excited for it and gonna play it.
[editline]1st August 2012[/editline]
I'm happy they're making this because I want it to be different from BF3, it's nice with a change and sometimes its fun to run n gun, you can't always do that in BF3.[/QUOTE]
Close quarters DLC?
If you want run and gun then do COD, that's the only major alternative and if you believe this is gonna do well MP wise and have a decent enough community then you're seriously lying to yourself.
[QUOTE=spekter;37027305]If you want run and gun then do COD[/QUOTE]
I don't like COD.
i couldn't give less of a shit about this game if i tried
[QUOTE=RichyZ;37027797]this is literally going to be cod with a better sp, and a more unoptimized engine and the mp is probably going to die in <3 weeks[/QUOTE]
This will be on the FB2 engine, which is why I'm looking forward to it.
I really want to see what an AAA game set during WW2 with today's tech would look like.
Or a WW1 game. I really want a WW1 game with old guns and old stuff.
But not with a documentary wrapper or any bullshit like that. I want the atmosphere of CoD with today's graphics and stuff.
If they made a good game set in the 2142 universe they would make money hand over fist. Why don't they realize this?
The only way they can get away with modern warfare is BC because it's hilarious and sort of not like the other russian shooting simulators
BC3 would be welcomed imo
[QUOTE=SKEEA;37028623]If they made a good game set in the 2142 universe they would make money hand over fist. Why don't they realize this?[/QUOTE]
I'm certain they have this planned. Heck, Battlefield [I]4[/I] might end up being that.
[QUOTE=spekter;37028670]I'm certain they have this planned. Heck, Battlefield 3 might end up being that.[/QUOTE]
I didn't see any metalgears in BF3, man.
[QUOTE=latin_geek;37028749]I didn't see any metalgears in BF3, man.[/QUOTE]
I meant 4 sorry :v:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
