• Rambo is a 'Machine of War' in new trailer
    23 replies, posted
[url]http://www.shacknews.com/article/82603/rambo-is-a-machine-of-war-in-new-trailer[/url]
Ah now we can play as Rambo and truley understand what it means to go "Rambo on someones ass"
[QUOTE=Beluntz;43488612]Ah now we can play as Rambo and truley understand what it means to go "Rambo on someones ass"[/QUOTE] As in covering yourself in cooking oil and keeping a stale face as you slaughter hundreds of people?
Why are they even making this game?
Oh I get it, it's supposed to be terrible.
[QUOTE=Bat-shit;43491526]Oh I get it, it's supposed to be terrible.[/QUOTE] I honestly don't get it. I understand making a parody movie terrible and all but it doesn't really work with a video game...?
I'm [I]pretty[/I] sure it's a rail shooter, or at least some parts of it are. I'm going to get it either way because it looks awesomely terrible. The stuff from First Blood looks good.
Yeah I'm pretty certain it's a rail shooter, the people making this made a whole bunch of rail shooters before.
To be honest it doesn't look as bad as it did the last time I saw it. If they can make a game where you go around killing people that plays well and is fairly priced I'd probably buy it.
Like I said in the last thread, this looks like it would have been awesome back when the PS2 was new. Now? Eh.
"I'm here to talk to you today about a man who killed dozens. He was a machine of war." Subtle. But uh...dozens? That is what qualifies someone to be a war machine?
Looks like some game you'd see in an arcade, which is fitting because the most I'd spend to play this game would be a quarter.
[QUOTE=IceWarrior98;43499751]"I'm here to talk to you today about a man who killed dozens. He was a machine of war." Subtle. But uh...dozens? That is what qualifies someone to be a war machine?[/QUOTE] Dozens could refer to 24 people or more. That's really quite impressive, considering he's usually without any sort of backup. In both films (First Blood part 1 doesn't count because he only indirectly killed one guy) he kills close to two hundred people. [editline]11th January 2014[/editline] The game itself could be fun, but there's a lot that's wrong with it. It's clearly a rail shooter, and it feels like a lot of assets and sounds are re-used over and over. It's also probably deathly repetitive. Looks like it would have been better as an arcade game than a retail game.
[QUOTE=Boba_Fett;43499832]A dozen could refer to 24 people or more. That's really quite impressive, considering he's usually without any sort of backup. In both films (First Blood part 1 doesn't count because he only indirectly killed one guy) he kills close to two hundred people. [editline]11th January 2014[/editline] The game itself could be fun, but there's a lot that's wrong with it. It's clearly a rail shooter, and it feels like a lot of assets and sounds are re-used over and over. It's also probably deathly repetitive. Looks like it would have been better as an arcade game than a retail game.[/QUOTE] A dozen is twelve.
[QUOTE=Broguts;43500202]A dozen is twelve.[/QUOTE] Well, [I]actually[/I] he said dozen[I]s[/I] which implies [I]a multiple of dozen[/I] making that a minimum of two dozens equaling a minimum of 24 men killed.
[QUOTE=General J;43500985]Well, [I]actually[/I] he said dozen[I]s[/I] which implies [I]a multiple of dozen[/I] making that a minimum of two dozens equaling a minimum of 24 men killed.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Boba_Fett;43499832]A [B]dozen[/B] could refer to 24 people or more.[/QUOTE] Yes [I]DOZENS [/I]could mean 24 or more, but he^ did in fact say [I]dozen, [/I]​which is twelve my good sir.
[QUOTE=Pappi_man;43488786]Why are they even making this game?[/QUOTE] Did your username just recently change? It's bugging me now.
[QUOTE=Npc_Hydra3;43502824]Yes [I]DOZENS [/I]could mean 24 or more, but he^ did in fact say [I]dozen, [/I]​which is twelve my good sir.[/QUOTE] Tis is, the indisputable fact remains that Boba_Fett did incorrectly state that a dozen was equal to a minimum of 24. [I]However[/I], in my mistaken haste, I did fail to mention that I was quoting the most-generic trailer man's words when I said "he", and would like to propose that it was indeed Boba_Fett's intention to do so as well.
[QUOTE=General J;43499809]Looks like some game you'd see in an arcade, which is fitting because the most I'd spend to play this game would be a quarter.[/QUOTE] I'm fairly sure this is a port of the 2010 Rambo arcade game with some "improved" graphics and extras added in. So your comment is kind of correct; it was an arcade game.
[QUOTE=Npc_Hydra3;43502824]Yes [I]DOZENS [/I]could mean 24 or more, but he^ did in fact say [I]dozen, [/I]​which is twelve my good sir.[/QUOTE] Yeah, you guys know what I meant. It was a typo.
[QUOTE=A big fat ass;43496224]I'm [I]pretty[/I] sure it's a rail shooter, or at least some parts of it are.[/QUOTE] Yep, it's a rail shooter. [video=youtube;xCjDFzrkC0g]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCjDFzrkC0g[/video]
Oh yeah, this is the shitty Rambo game where he kills a ton of people in First Blood, a movie in which he didn't kill a single fucking person unless you count the dude who fell out of the helicopter because the pilot jerked the stick when Rambo threw a rock at them.
This looks just like that horrible Soldier of Fortune 4 game... I remember trying to play that once, it was so fuckawful I just gave up. Somehow my brother played it to completion though, god bless him.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.