[QUOTE]It was especially hard not to bang my head against the table when I heard an interview with female spectators wrapped up with the words, "You guys! Super hot chicks are getting ready to play Dota 2!"[/QUOTE]
This is why we can't have nice things. This is why [URL="http://fatuglyorslutty.com"]fatuglyorslutty.com[/URL] exists.
[QUOTE=elixwhitetail;45455900]This is why we can't have nice things. This is why [URL="http://fatuglyorslutty.com"]fatuglyorslutty.com[/URL] exists.[/QUOTE]
jesus christ you have to be a really shitty person to send that shit to someone.
I feel bad for those women, seriously.
[QUOTE]Not only was there no explanation about the game, but the term "MOBA" was hardly mentioned at all. [/QUOTE]
Because Valve doesn't use the term MOBA.
[QUOTE=Ragekipz;45457557]Because Valve doesn't use the term MOBA.[/QUOTE]
MOBA was a term coined by Riot; who made League of Legends. A more universal term is ARTS (Action Real Time Strategy).
Call me horrible, but I have to admit the proposal was kind of hilarious. Nothing more romantic.
[QUOTE=MasterFen006;45458157]MOBA was a term coined by Riot; who made League of Legends. A more universal term is ARTS (Action Real Time Strategy).[/QUOTE]
WoW had battle arenas, and it was an MMORPG.
Neither LoL nor Dota2 involves a battle arena more than a battlefield, with bases, cliffs, and rivers etc. I hate Riot.
[editline]22nd July 2014[/editline]
Also wait this is a bit wrong to argue about acronyms (ARTS all the way) over this piece of news which I also found a bit.. concerning? A lot of people didn't seem to take eSport's big appearance with Dota2 on ESPN2 so good.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
