Yeah, also at idle (1.6 GHz) it's about 34-38c. To mention, my room is very hot (about 35c).Is it OK or do i need to do something for it?
I'ts okay.
Probably you have a stock fan with quiet fan things enabled in the BIOS.
If you don't like the temps and your room is hot often, get another cpu fan like a coolermaster hyper 212.
[QUOTE=Drumdevil;37387431]I'ts okay.
Probably you have a stock fan with quiet fan things enabled in the BIOS.
If you don't like the temps and your room is hot often, get another cpu fan like a coolermaster hyper 212.[/QUOTE]
What? Isn't the H80 supposed to be better than the Hyper 212?
Lol no, they perform about the same.
[QUOTE=Zerokateo;37389280]Lol no, they perform about the same.[/QUOTE]
Oh god. What about overclocking? I think it should be better on more speed.
Bump. So, I downloaded SpeedFan, and it shows around 40c, it has the right gpu temp, too. Is speccy failing?
[IMG]http://i47.tinypic.com/xll8pu.png[/IMG]
IMO, you should trust Speccy over Speedfan. Speccy is a very reliable program which I haven't seen fault or misread any temperatures thus far, but Speedfan does it all the time. Another point is that Speedfan is coded by one guy which is more prone to a lot of compatibility issues (maybe not with changing fan speed, but rather reading the temps themselves) vs a program designed by a company with many people to help work out bugs with compatibility.
[editline]24th August 2012[/editline]
However there are better temperature programs out there. For instance, hwmonitor.
I used real temp and core temp for mine and with my 3570k @ 4.4ghz with a A50 cooler i get 70C max on full load.
[QUOTE=Cjmax;37391533]IMO, you should trust Speccy over Speedfan. Speccy is a very reliable program which I haven't seen fault or misread any temperatures thus far, but Speedfan does it all the time. Another point is that Speedfan is coded by one guy which is more prone to a lot of compatibility issues (maybe not with changing fan speed, but rather reading the temps themselves) vs a program designed by a company with many people to help work out bugs with compatibility.
[editline]24th August 2012[/editline]
However there are better temperature programs out there. For instance, hwmonitor.[/QUOTE]
No, speccy cannot be trusted when it comes to temps.
Watercoolers wont even have their temperatures under the room's temps, that is, unless you're using some sort of custom cooling on the radiator.
34~~38 on IDLE w/ a 35c room is expected.
[QUOTE=Drumdevil;37395818]No, speccy cannot be trusted when it comes to temps.[/QUOTE]
Stop trying to one-up each other on which program is shit because it doesn't report accurate temps.
There are no secret pieces of hardware or algorithms that make hwmonitor more accurate than speedfan or speccy, or any which way between. They all read temperature data from the exact same chip on the SMBus. If the reading is fucked on one program, its pretty certain it's going to be fucked on all other programs due to either the monitoring chip being broken or buggy. Or the fact that the manufacturers of those chips usually requiring NDAs and other blocking methods to prevent the general public from getting spec sheets on the chips.
62c load is fine, mine goes to 75 with a h60. But im at 4.8.
I tried 4.4 and it went upto 71. Tomorrow i will move the fans and the radiator to the top for an intake. I'm guessing that it will be better.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.