I hope they don't fuck up the port for PC like they did with IV.
Well they did a great job porting max payne 3 to pc so i'm pretty confident it will be a good port
[QUOTE=isnipeu;46749918]I hope they don't fuck up the port for PC like they did with IV.[/QUOTE]
It's not a port, it was developed alongside the console version.
I'd hope that it's in the final stage of development a month before it comes out. :v:
[QUOTE=isnipeu;46749918]I hope they don't fuck up the port for PC like they did with IV.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=recolour;46749954]Well they did a great job porting max payne 3 to pc so i'm pretty confident it will be a good port[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=NassimO PotatO;46750004]It's not a port, it was developed alongside the console version.[/QUOTE]
Accurate simulation of every single GTA5 PC thread
[QUOTE=Handsome Matt;46750120][t]http://i.imgur.com/rkrFYOO.png[/t]
8 people were playing the other day.
[t]http://i.imgur.com/SPdijf2.png[/t]
and achievements were added yesterday.
looks like it's really shaping up now.[/QUOTE]
Hopefully that should confirm Steamworks with a bit of luck and hopefully should mean we don't have to create a new account for GTA Online.
[QUOTE=smurfy;46750192]Accurate simulation of every single GTA5 PC thread[/QUOTE]
And let me continue it :P
@Genericenemy
No, the game will use Social Club due to many reasons, among the sharing elements, the snapmatic website on social club and the Online character transfering. However, just like Max Payne 3 and L.A. Noire, the game will have Steam Achievements (and Cloud).
So stoked to get nothing productive done beginning January 27th.
I hope to god Heists arrive before the PC release. I don't want to be "that guy" posting in the GTA thread "hey uh does anyone still play PS4" :(
Holy fuck! ACHIEVEMENTS!
Sometimes I only buy games for the achievements, but this game really will be perfect
GTAIV was like 10 years ago and its still the superior of GTA games so I don't know what people's problem is.
[QUOTE=Cypher_09;46756365]Sometimes I only buy games for the achievements[/QUOTE]
What, why?
If I'm not sure whether I want a game. It looks good, but I'm torn between two, then the one with the achievements will get it. I'm a huge completionist.
[QUOTE=Bat-shit;46756475]GTAIV was like 10 years ago and its still the superior of GTA games so I don't know what people's problem is.[/QUOTE]
GTA4 was shit compared to San Andreas.
Hopefully they open up preorders alongside with the release of system requirements and include some goodies.
[QUOTE=NightmareX91;46756663]GTA4 was shit compared to San Andreas.[/QUOTE]
SA was shit compared to VC
[editline]20th December 2014[/editline]
:(
Im still wondering if we are going to be able to activate the game on steam even if its a physical copy
[QUOTE=MegaMario1500;46750755]And let me continue it :P
@Genericenemy
No, the game will use Social Club due to many reasons, among the sharing elements, the snapmatic website on social club and the Online character transfering. However, just like Max Payne 3 and L.A. Noire, the game will have Steam Achievements (and Cloud).[/QUOTE]
I just hope Social Club won't be a pain in the ass like it was for me in Max Payne 3
[QUOTE=Genericenemy;46750358]Hopefully that should confirm Steamworks with a bit of luck and hopefully should mean we don't have to create a new account for GTA Online.[/QUOTE]
Max Payne 3 has Achievements, it didn't have Steamworks and it still required Social Club.
Social Club is where all your Multiplayer Data is hosted. So you will need an account to play GTAO
I'm really confident with the PC version. It's not even a port, because it was developed on a different branch of the project, and the same team who ported MP3 is working on it.
[QUOTE=Cypher_09;46756365]Holy fuck! ACHIEVEMENTS!
Sometimes I only buy games for the achievements, but this game really will be perfect[/QUOTE]
I never really got the point of video game achievements. I've never felt like I've achieved anything unlocking them.
[QUOTE=Tuskin;46757203]
Social Club is where all your Multiplayer Data is hosted. So you will need an account to play GTAO[/QUOTE]
Not necessarily. They can make it so you can either log into existing account or just use your steam id for new account, no need to make a social club one.
[editline]20th December 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=-n3o-;46757363]I never really got the point of video game achievements. I've never felt like I've achieved anything unlocking them.[/QUOTE]At least on xbox you get useless number score, on steam you get virtually nothing.
[QUOTE=Bat-shit;46757036]SA was shit compared to VC
[editline]20th December 2014[/editline]
:([/QUOTE]
VC was shit compared to... No, actually VC is the best one.
[QUOTE=Bat-shit;46756475]GTAIV was like 10 years ago and its still the superior of GTA games so I don't know what people's problem is.[/QUOTE]
GTAIV was shit though
The Ballad of Gay Tony was the only good thing to come from it, I'd much rather play San Andreas or, at this point, V.
IV brought the new technology, had a nice enough story mode, but i think it will just get totally overshadowed by the new installments to come just like GTA III did. I can't see myself playing IV after V comes to PC.
[QUOTE=MatheusMCardoso;46758132]IV brought the new technology, had a nice enough story mode, but i think it will just get totally overshadowed by the new installments to come just like GTA III did. I can't see myself playing IV after V comes to PC.[/QUOTE]
Technology was ALL IV brought.
The storyline was too serious, the PC port was horrid, the mission checkpoints were nonexistent (even though this was a problem up until V, San Andreas at least had Trip Skip, which was absent from IV), character customization was a huge letdown, the characters weren't enjoyable, all the RPG elements that were actually pretty cool (and the rewards they brought, like being fireproof and dual wielding and shit) disappeared, the city was grey and boring, the guns were all weak and felt the same, and the movement fucking sucked. Like why did it take more than a second to turn around, and why did Niko always feel the need to run forward first, killing me on multiple occasions, instead of just turning his feet to the right or left like a normal human being would?
I feel like everyone lets this shit slide because it was the first "next-gen" GTA that had the technology for animating all five fingers. Like, at least TBoGT brought back the humor after I guess they realized it still wasn't working for TLAD, but the game's already overshadowed by its [I]predecessor[/I]. The only enjoyable thing is Euphoria and the high quality animations, the gameplay and everything else was awful.
IV really was technically astounding for its time though, and still today I think it's probably the most believable city I've seen in a game (haven't played V yet though)
Once I do play V I can't imagine going back to IV very much, but that's partially I've played so so much of it since it came out.
[QUOTE=gk99;46758228]Technology was ALL IV brought.
The storyline was too serious, the PC port was horrid, the mission checkpoints were nonexistent (even though this was a problem up until V, San Andreas at least had Trip Skip, which was absent from IV), character customization was a huge letdown, the characters weren't enjoyable, all the RPG elements that were actually pretty cool (and the rewards they brought, like being fireproof and dual wielding and shit) disappeared, the city was grey and boring, the guns were all weak and felt the same, and the movement fucking sucked. Like why did it take more than a second to turn around, and why did Niko always feel the need to run forward first, killing me on multiple occasions, instead of just turning his feet to the right or left like a normal human being would?
I feel like everyone lets this shit slide because it was the first "next-gen" GTA that had the technology for animating all five fingers. Like, at least TBoGT brought back the humor after I guess they realized it still wasn't working for TLAD, but the game's already overshadowed by its [I]predecessor[/I]. The only enjoyable thing is Euphoria and the high quality animations, the gameplay and everything else was awful.[/QUOTE]
I liked it serious, it actually felt like the game was made for adults to play.
The ragdoll physics system was amazing and I spent hours on end fucking around with them.
The driving was amazing, I loved being able to flip my car from turning too hard.
With all the childish humor in GTA V I feel like they are trying to cater to 13 yearold boys who still make fart jokes.
[QUOTE=gk99;46757773]GTAIV was shit though
The Ballad of Gay Tony was the only good thing to come from it, I'd much rather play San Andreas or, at this point, V.[/QUOTE]
I'm so sick of hearing this. just because you only care about over the top sandbox gameplay that doesn't mean it was a bad game. GTA IV was an incredible game for its time. Not only was it revolutionary from a technical standpoint, but the aesthetics and narrative were both great despite some occasional hiccups. people also like to forget how big of a deal it was to have a multiplayer free roaming sandbox game of that calibre at that time, nobody had done it before and nobody did it again until long after.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
