Google openly and literally shapes the information for monetary gain and market/social share influence and then claim they have no control.
fhahahahahahahaaa
douchenozzle fucktards.
[QUOTE=27X;44796552]Google openly and literally shapes the information for monetary gain and market/social share influence[/quote]
[noparse][citation needed][/noparse]
[QUOTE=27X;44796552]and then claim they have no control.[/QUOTE]
That's right, Google have no control over the contents of external sites.
Google are turning in to cunts lately.
They're all too happy to omit results for pirated and 'illegal' content, but as soon as a private individual wants to remove irrelevant, potentially implicating results they're fighting against it.
We're living in an age where every mistake we make will never be forgotten, and people will be able to view your life history through a search engine. At the very least, let people remove results for things they did whilst under the age of 18.
[QUOTE=Noss;44797606]Google are turning in to cunts lately.
They're all too happy to omit results for pirated and 'illegal' content, but as soon as a private individual wants to remove irrelevant, potentially implicating results they're fighting against it.
We're living in an age where every mistake we make will never be forgotten, and people will be able to view your life history through a search engine. At the very least, let people remove results for things they did whilst under the age of 18.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/public-sector/2013/11/conservatives-erase-internet-h.html[/url]
If you have lots of money then you can be forgotten easily.
[QUOTE=mdeceiver79;44797659][url]http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/public-sector/2013/11/conservatives-erase-internet-h.html[/url]
If you have lots of money then you can be forgotten easily.[/QUOTE]
Didn't really require any money, they just deleted the speeches from their site and threw up a robots.txt
[QUOTE=smurfy;44797825]Didn't really require any money, they just deleted the speeches from their site and threw up a robots.txt[/QUOTE]
I stand corrected. Thanks for that.
[quote]Google said the ruling was "disappointing".[/quote]
The fact that you say that is disappointing.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
