• Guilty verdict for woman who stole, euthanised dying neighbour’s dog
    53 replies, posted
[QUOTE]A US woman found guilty of stealing and euthanising her terminally ill neighbour’s dog may face up to ten years in prison. Gisele Paris was accused of taking the Siberian husky, Thor, from the garden of her Pittsburgh neighbour Mark Boehler in November 2013. She had the dog euthanised in her home by a licensed veterinarian on February 10, WPXI reports. Paris was found guilty of theft, receiving stolen property and cruelty to animals.[/QUOTE] What a horrible cunt, Jesus Christ. [url]http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/home/guilty-verdict-for-woman-who-stole-euthanised-dying-neighbours-dog/story-fngwib2y-1227168195560?sv=1f3c4190b710957a466f93a5db8b3116[/url]
Ten years is enough for a horrible person like this.
How much of a piece of shit can you be?
Do vets usually just euthanize any animal without looking into its records to check for its owner first?
[QUOTE=Chaohord;46805125]Do vets usually just uthanize any animal without looking into its records to check for its owner first?[/QUOTE]We can barely share medical records between healthcare agencies and workers in this country. You think there is any kind of functional record keeping on pets?
[QUOTE]A veterinarian testified in court that Thor was healthy and had a treatable condition.[/QUOTE] Uh, why does the title say the dog was dying?
Before anyone makes the mistake I was making, the title means that the neighbor has cancer; the dog was perfectly fine. [editline]27th December 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=jiggu;46805158]Uh, why does the title say the dog was dying?[/QUOTE] i am too late
[QUOTE=Doctor Zedacon;46805138]We can barely share medical records between healthcare agencies and workers in this country. You think there is any kind of functional record keeping on pets?[/QUOTE] In New Jersey at least we're required to have dog licenses which need to be renewed every couple years, not sure about the situation in other states.
[QUOTE=jiggu;46805158]Uh, why does the title say the dog was dying?[/QUOTE] "[B]terminally ill neighbour’s[/B] dog" verses "neighbour’s[B] terminally ill dog[/B]"
[QUOTE=highvoltage;46805219]"[B]terminally ill neighbour’s[/B] dog" verses "neighbour’s[B] terminally ill dog[/B]"[/QUOTE] These can be understood in the same way really. Should have been "dog of a neighbor who was terminally ill"
neighbor did it to my cat once (wasnt terminally ill either) because she hated my families cats no justice so far glad to see someone getting justice for it elsewhere
[QUOTE=highvoltage;46805219]"[B]terminally ill neighbour’s[/B] dog" verses "neighbour’s[B] terminally ill dog[/B]"[/QUOTE] Yeah a mod should fix that, kind of a dealbreaker really
alternately you can read the OP and realize what is actually the case (which I didn't.. really misread before coming in here)
Heartless fucking bitch.
[QUOTE=highvoltage;46805219]"[B]terminally ill neighbour’s[/B] dog" verses "neighbour’s[B] terminally ill dog[/B]"[/QUOTE] I first thought it was the second wording and thought that woman might have some justification in putting the dog down if it was in a state of suffering. What a misleading thread title. Now I stand corrected. She is an absolute loon, sadist, and an all-round terrible person.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;46806411]These can be understood in the same way really. Should have been "dog of a neighbor who was terminally ill"[/QUOTE] Your grasp of the English language, is as weak as that woman's grasp of reality.
[QUOTE=Chaohord;46805125]Do vets usually just uthanize any animal without looking into its records to check for its owner first?[/QUOTE] I don't know about big cities like Pittsburgh, but my local vets usually only look into records when handing out medication or looking into an infection coming back, and those files are organized per-person. If you took someone else's dog, the only thing that could happen is you getting the vet the real owner uses and they recognize it. And if you're putting a dog down, the most you need to do is convince the vet that it's your dog and that you don't want it anymore. Sucks, but any system that prevents it would cost a ton, and you could still kill the neighbor's dog without doing it through a vet
I don't get it. Why would a vet put down a perfectly healthy dog? Wouldn't they want to do alternatives like taking the dog to a shelter or something?
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;46806411]These can be understood in the same way really. Should have been "dog of a neighbor who was terminally ill"[/QUOTE] That can still be read as the dog being terminally ill.
[QUOTE]“I was thrilled to death she got convicted,” Mr Boehler said.[/QUOTE] Damn it you sly son of a bitch
[QUOTE=Katatonic717;46807162]I don't get it. Why would a vet put down a perfectly healthy dog? Wouldn't they want to do alternatives like taking the dog to a shelter or something?[/QUOTE] Exactly, this sounds odd. No good vet would just put down a perfectly healthy animal. Not to imply I don't trust the story happened how it was reported, just the vet sounds like a pile of shit for just killing a probably clearly healthy dog.
She gets arrested but the piece of shit PETA people who literally did the exact same thing got off scott free?
[QUOTE=Starlight 456;46807274]Exactly, this sounds odd. No good vet would just put down a perfectly healthy animal. Not to imply I don't trust the story happened how it was reported, just the vet sounds like a pile of shit for just killing a probably clearly healthy dog.[/QUOTE] I've known people who have dropped up off a perfectly healthy pet and come back in an hour only to find out they've already been put down.
[QUOTE=Xubs;46809022]PETA, like a lot of horrible organizations in this country, have lawyers on the payroll that'll fuck you up if you even try to touch them. A lot of organizations like PETA and etc are actually considered domestic terrorist organizations by US government and human rights officials alike, but until they do something incredibly egregious and law-breaking they can't really touch them.[/QUOTE] This is what I hate about justice system is that if you are rich enough to afford pimped out lawyers, a lot of laws are either a lot laxer towards you or downright nonexistent. A real rich privilege. A person does something horrible and gets years in prison and yet when a rich organization does it they get off scott free. That's fucked up if you ask me.
[QUOTE=Xubs;46809022]PETA, like a lot of horrible organizations in this country, have lawyers on the payroll that'll fuck you up if you even try to touch them. A lot of organizations like PETA and etc are actually considered domestic terrorist organizations by US government and human rights officials alike, but until they do something incredibly egregious and law-breaking they can't really touch them.[/QUOTE] That's a very rich train of thought. If you class over zealous PETA activists as terrorists, the whole planet is full of psychopaths. I'm sure governments and very "normal" business/industries have done alot of harm and damage to humanity and the planet. If Facepunch was to become Pro Valve community because it doesn't raise prices of it's games, or infringe on peoples privacy, there be people calling it "Terrorist" organization. If your worried about justice, law, ethics, because the way I see it t maybe you should make an issue of the dog being classed as "receiving stolen property", it's a dog you live side by side with and it breaths. You don't own your baby, your insurance company doesn't replace it if it dies or gets stolen.
[QUOTE=Lui2112;46809194]That's a very rich train of thought. If you class over zealous PETA activists as terrorists, the whole planet is full of psychopaths.[/QUOTE] google the ALF peta supports them. edit: for those too lazy to google [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Liberation_Front[/url]
[QUOTE=Xubs;46809276]are you saying PETA doesn't harbor terrorists it's pretty obvious there is a large subsection of PETA's activists who are animal liberationists, and many PETA members are quick to pardon the acts of violence done in PETA's name. PETA has also been proven to give grants to various groups frequently accused in doing violent and illegal activity in the name of animal liberation.[/QUOTE] Are you saying animal Rights, and freedom from human control shouldn't exist on earth?
[QUOTE=nikomo;46806640]Your grasp of the English language, is as weak as that woman's grasp of reality.[/QUOTE] No, he is correct in saying that it could be interpreted either way. That being said, it would seem that it was the neighbor who was terminally ill.
10 years in prison for killing a dog -seriously?- I think that is kind of a bit much... Besides, what is her reasoning? for all you know this might be the situation: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwXe_iFRFoU[/media]
[QUOTE=Xubs;46809022]PETA, like a lot of horrible organizations in this country, have lawyers on the payroll that'll fuck you up if you even try to touch them. A lot of organizations like PETA and etc are actually considered domestic terrorist organizations by US government and human rights officials alike, but until they do something incredibly egregious and law-breaking they can't really touch them.[/QUOTE] Actually that's not true. I worked as an intern in a law firm that specialized in tracking PETA's members for the government. They keep them around so they put pretty much everyone who works for them on a government watchlist so they can arrest the individual members at later dates if they actually do anything too funky. PETA is a legal company, it's members are the real weirdos. That one case was a weird one though, they must not have had enough evidence to get it in through court, or maybe it was because they held the euthanization at PETA's headquarters.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.