• Casey Anthony Sued by Caylee Search Team For $100,000
    86 replies, posted
[URL]http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/07/13/casey-anthony-served-with-lawsuit-while-in-jail/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+foxnews%2Fnational+(Internal+-+US+Latest+-+Text)[/URL] [QUOTE][URL="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/casey-anthony.htm#r_src=ramp"]Casey Anthony[/URL] will be released from a Florida jail on Sunday, but her legal troubles aren't over yet, as she has been hit with a lawsuit by Texas Equusearch, the group that led the search for her 2-year-old daughter, [URL="http://www.foxnews.com/topics/caylee-anthony.htm#r_src=ramp"]Caylee Anthony[/URL]. The search team is suing Anthony for over $100,000, claiming that she wasted their time and resources searching for Caylee, knowing she would never be found alive, reported MyFoxOrlando.com. “It certainly wasn’t fair to anybody that was involved and wasn’t fair to the families that really needed us,” Tim Miller, founder of Equusearch, said. Anthony was convicted of repeatedly lying to authorities after Caylee's disappearance in summer 2008, but she was cleared of murder and other charges related to the death of the girl, whose body was found months later in woods near her home. Anthony was served with Equusearch's lawsuit at the Orange County Jail on Wednesday by Bonnie Moore from Process Xpress. Moore said it appeared that Anthony had just woken up when she served her. “There was really no reaction. She just asked me if I had gotten a copy to her attorney,” she told reporters. Miller told Fox 35 that he remembers showing up at Anthony's house in summer 2008. “She hugged us and kissed her on the cheek, and I said ‘I’m so sorry about what you’re going through right now,’ and she said ‘Well, thanks for being here right now. I know she’s alive out there somewhere so please bring her back.'” Miller said this is the first lawsuit the organization has filed in its 10-year existence. [/QUOTE] I would put up a better source, but my ancient computer is going whack, so I can't.
Could this be the civil suit that ruins her? Like OJ Simpson's.
People were comparing this to a modern day OJ trial.
dumb bitch deserves it
Have I lived under a rock for so long that I don't know who the fuck Casey Anthony is?
I'm guessing it won't go through.
[QUOTE=crazyjames;31102891]Have I lived under a rock for so long that I don't know who the fuck Casey Anthony is?[/QUOTE] Woman whose kid went missing, she didn't report it for a month. It comes to light and there's a lot of things that made people think that SHE did it. The kid was eventually found dead in a swamp with duct tape on her mouth.
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;31102922]Woman whose kid went missing, she didn't report it for a month. It comes to light and there's a lot of things that made people think that SHE did it. The kid was eventually found dead in a swamp with duct tape on her mouth.[/QUOTE] Thats fucked up thanks for the info.
[QUOTE=crazyjames;31102942]Thats fucked up thanks for the info.[/QUOTE] Gets worse than that, sadly. It's been all over the news, must be a mighty big rock you live under there, sport.
Probably won't go threw because she never asked for the help.
can people just leave this woman alone already? caylee is long gone
My question on this: Did she contract a search? Did she sign paperwork accepting financial responsibility? Cause if she didn't I don't see why she should pay. If people want to search, that's on them.
[QUOTE=cecilbdemodded;31104001]My question on this: Did she contract a search? Did she sign paperwork accepting financial responsibility? Cause if she didn't I don't see why she should pay. If people want to search, that's on them.[/QUOTE] She knew where the baby was yet still had them searching.
[QUOTE=cecilbdemodded;31104001]My question on this: Did she contract a search? Did she sign paperwork accepting financial responsibility? Cause if she didn't I don't see why she should pay. If people want to search, that's on them.[/QUOTE] It's not as black and white as "did she sign paperwork for it" Take a look at this example of quasi-contracts and unjust enrichment. [url]http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/small/Co-Di/Contracts.html[/url] [quote] In addition to express and implied contracts are "quasi-contracts," which arise from unique circumstances. Quasi-contracts are obligations imposed by law to avoid injustice. For instance, suppose that a man hires a woman to paint his house. By accident, she paints the wrong house. The owner of the house [b]knows that she is painting it by mistake[/b] but, happy to have a free paint job, [b]says nothing. The painter would likely be able to collect something from the homeowner because he knowingly was "unjustly enriched" at her expense[/b]. Had she painted his house while he was on vacation, he would be under no obligation to her. [/quote] Now comparing that example to this case, she certainly took the search group's help knowingly. [b]This isn't an example of her being on vacation while some search party went to search for her daughter without her knowledge, she 100% knowingly accepted the help of this group and wasted their resources and needs to be held accountable.[/b] I took several college courses on business law and heard about stuff like this all the time. There's a good chance she could be (and in my opinion, should be) held liable for these wasted resources.
If Caylee were older or a minority this shitshtorm would have never happened. prove me wrong.
Hope this goes through, she deserves much worse.
Considering that she funded the trial by selling her family albums and videos to ABC, she'll probably pay for this with a book deal or a few talk show appearances. Whether she killed the kid or not, she's famous enough to be set for life.
[QUOTE=MaveDustaine;31104354]If Caylee were older or a minority this shitshtorm would have never happened. prove me wrong.[/QUOTE] Don't forget male! The disease in society is called Pretty White WOMAN syndrome.
My question is, where's the proof. If she isn't guilty then she obviously didn't do it.
[QUOTE=FPChris;31104648]My question is, where's the proof. If she isn't guilty then she obviously didn't do it.[/QUOTE] This is a separate case and it's unrelated to the murder charges. [b]She had a missing persons group go searching for a person who she knew wasn't missing[/b], because she lied to them and said her daughter was alive, wasting the group's time and money in the process, which could have been used to find other people.
[QUOTE=Used Car Salesman;31104382]Considering that she funded the trial by selling her family albums and videos to ABC, she'll probably pay for this with a book deal or a few talk show appearances. Whether she killed the kid or not, she's famous enough to be set for life.[/QUOTE] Set for life? I don't think so. Her name is permanently scarred. She'd have to live in a town completely cut-off from the media so no one would know or move to a different country. Their is so much hate for her I wouldn't be surprised if they found her dead.
[QUOTE=Sanius;31103636]can people just leave this woman alone already? caylee is long gone[/QUOTE] That's the problem right there, Caylee was long gone before people were searching. She was out partying while entire families were out looking for the child she knew was dead, and that she probably killed.
[QUOTE=Noble;31104783]This is a separate case and it's unrelated to the murder charges. [b]She had a missing persons group go searching for a person who she knew wasn't missing[/b], because she lied to them and said her daughter was alive, wasting the group's time and money in the process, which could have been used to find other people.[/QUOTE] I am not very familiar with this case either. How did she know her daughter wasn't missing?
[QUOTE=Sanius;31103636]can people just leave this woman alone already? caylee is long gone[/QUOTE] And Casey wasted thousands of people's resources and time in the process.
[QUOTE=Zah;31109421]I am not very familiar with this case either. How did she know her daughter wasn't missing?[/QUOTE] Because she killed her. The jury said she didn't but the evidence against her is astounding.
[QUOTE=Zah;31109421]I am not very familiar with this case either. How did she know her daughter wasn't missing?[/QUOTE] Her own defense in court against the murder charges was that her daughter drowned in a pool and she didn't report the death for a month..therefore she obviously knew the girl wasn't going to be found alive. [url]http://abcnews.go.com/US/casey_anthony_trial/casey-anthony-trial-defense-claims-caylee-anthony-drowned/story?id=13674375[/url] My guess is that she wasted the time and resources of this search group for the sake of strengthening the innocent "omg i cant find my child" facade she had going on there.
[QUOTE=J0E_SpRaY;31109493]Because she killed her. The jury said she didn't but the evidence against her is astounding.[/QUOTE] I will have to look into the case further then. The only knowledge i have was from live coverage of the trial while waiting in an airport for a few hours. That news channel said there was no evidence against her and what little there was could be considered 'caused by distress'.
[QUOTE=J0E_SpRaY;31109493]Because she killed her. The jury said she didn't but the evidence against her is astounding.[/QUOTE] No the evidence is not astounding. They can't even prove how the daughter died. I think, in a MURDER case, if you can't even say how the victim died then your evidence is less than astounding. Also, relative to the example of law earlier, she was not 'enriched' in any way by the search. What did she gain? In the painting example, the homeowner gained a freshly painted house for free. There is unquestioned value there. What value do you get when people search for something?
[QUOTE=cecilbdemodded;31111813]No the evidence is not astounding. They can't even prove how the daughter died. I think, in a MURDER case, if you can't even say how the victim died then your evidence is less than astounding. Also, relative to the example of law earlier, she was not 'enriched' in any way by the search. What did she gain? In the painting example, the homeowner gained a freshly painted house for free. There is unquestioned value there. What value do you get when people search for something?[/QUOTE] She "gained" credibility for her lie (of her daughter being alive) at the expense of this group's efforts and resources. She didn't want to turn down the help of the search group because it would have incriminated her (why would you turn down a groups help to find your missing child?). So instead of saying "no, my daughter is already dead, I don't need your help" (which according to her defense, she knew she was dead from the beginning), she had them go ahead with the search under the promise of "I know she's still alive out there" in order to strengthen her lie. So yes, there's a possibility the court can see this as a form of "unjust enrichment". Bottom line, as I said in my post before: She had a missing persons group go searching for a person who she knew wasn't missing
[QUOTE=J0E_SpRaY;31109493]Because she killed her. The jury said she didn't but the evidence against her is astounding.[/QUOTE] Nobody gives a shit about your armchair analysis of the evidence, a jury of her peers found her INNOCENT. The media conduct surrounding the Casey Anthony trial has been absolutely APPALLING. Regardless of whether or not she is guilty or innocent in the mind of the public, she was found to be innocent. I don't care what she did - I thought in America being found innocent in a court of law meant something. We're degenerating to mob rule which the court system was supposed to replace. The fact that several well known news sources are practically calling out for her death is disgusting, given the fact that as far as American law is concerned, she is completely innocent besides the charges of providing false information. It really is sad that the court system means nothing to these people. People are wrongly accused and tried for horrendous crimes all of the time - It is just the media coverage that is making this into one embarrassing "social issue" for people to spout their ignorance about.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.