Worst Parenting Ever: Woman Gets 20 Years For Sexually Abusing Daughter On Webcam
41 replies, posted
[url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1366537/The-worst-case-Ive-seen-Julie-Carr-Maine-sexually-assaulted-year-old-sick-webcam-sentenced-20-years.html]Source[/url]
[release][list]
[*][B]Julie Carr made shocking films for British teenager[/B]
[*][B]Videos uncovered in U.K. led to arrest in America[/B]
[*][B]Victim picked because 'she was the cutest'[/B]
[/list]
A woman who performed sex acts on her own 2-year-old girl while a man in the United Kingdom watched live via a web-cam has been sentenced to 20 years in prison.
Julie Carr, 33, from Maine, has been sentenced a year after confessing that she recorded the videos for the teenager.
Summing up the case, U.S. District Judge John Woodcock said he had dealt with many child pornography cases and 'yours is the worst case I've ever seen.'
[quote][tab]Monsters: Julie Carr (left) admitted to performing sex acts on a 2-year-old while teenage Nicholas Wilde watched in Britain. He is seen defiantly gesturing to the camera at his 2010 sentencing[/tab][img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/03/15/article-1366537-0B300D1900000578-96_224x423.jpg[/img] [img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/03/15/article-1366537-0B30167C00000578-218_224x423.jpg[/img][/quote]
The Bangor Daily News said when she pleaded guilty in February 2010, Carr admitted making four live videos of herself performing sex acts on her youngest daughter.
Sentencing her yesterday, Judge Woodcock said: 'What you have done, Ms. Carr, is violate the most basic bond of society, the bond between a mother and her child, the bond between a mother and her daughter.
'It is incumbent upon me to protect ... the people who can't protect themselves.
'I’ll tell you, unequivocally, that yours is the worst case I’ve ever seen.
[quote][B][U]Time line of abuse[/U][/B]
[B]Unknown:[/B] Carr and Wilde meet on internet dating site
[B]June 9 to June 11, 2009:[/B] Wilde 'directs' Carr into making live recordings with daughter
[B]June 11, 2009:[/B] Wilde arrested in England after sending images to 16-year-old girl he met on-line
[B]June 13, 2009:[/B] Carr arrested after international hunt
[B]February 2010:[/B] Carr pleads guilty
[B]February 8, 2010:[/B] Wilde sentenced to four years in jail
[B]March 14, 2011:[/B] Carr sentenced to 20 years in jail[/quote]
'I have always thought possession was bad enough, but production is another level of evil,' the judge added.
'It never crossed my mind that [pornography] would be the child’s mother. The most natural response, after revulsion, is protecting the child.'
Carr’s three daughters were all under the age of 4 when she met Wilde on an internet dating site.
She made the sexually abusive live-chat videos of her youngest daughter, who was 34 months old at the time and still in nappies.
Sickeningly, assistant U.S. Attorney Todd Lowell said Wilde had picked the girl out as 'she was the cutest'.
Mr Lowell told Judge Woodcock, 'She was a mouse click away from distributing those images all around the world.'
According to the paper, Mr Lowell also thanked local and English law enforcement for their quick action to stop the international Internet crime.
Carr’s four children, her three daughters and a son, were removed from her custody after her arrest.
Mr Lowell said: 'The children are doing well.
'In a real way, her children have been rescued and saved.'
[quote][tab]Sick: Wilde and Carr met on an Internet-based dating site and he chose the youngest daughter because she was the cutest, prosecutors said.[/tab][img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/03/15/article-1366537-0B30680700000578-685_468x292.jpg[/img][/quote]
Police in the West Midlands region of England discovered the videos, which were recorded by Nicholas Wilde, in June 2009 while investigating another child pornography case.
Wilde was arrested after sending child sex abuse images to a 16-year-old girl he met in an internet chat room.
The girl and her mother contacted the police and Wilde was traced and subsequently arrested by officers from the child exploitation unit at West Midlands Police.
The clips were made between June 9 and June 11, before being saved onto a memory stick by Wilde.
Shockingly, the films showed Wilde directing Carr in the abuse, according to prosecutors.
After an international hunt the recordings were traced to Maine, and Carr was arrested two days later.
During the trial Carr said Wilde 'conned' her into doing it.
The teenager from Sheffield admitted 10 charges of making, possessing or distributing indecent images of children and also possessing extreme pornography.
Wilde also admitted two charges of incitement to commit sexual assault of a child under 13 – offences that led to the arrest of Carr.
At his sentencing, the court heard that detectives seized a computer and a memory stick from his bedroom, uncovering a collection of photographs at the most serious end of the child pornography scale involving children as young as 18-months-old.
The memory stick also contained footage of a woman in Maine, who later turned out to be Carr, abusing a young child.
Jailing Wilde for four years and eight months, Judge Hilary Watson said of the exchange with Carr: 'It was entirely for your benefit, at your direction, for the sexual gratification of Nicholas Wilde.'
The judge added his youth was 'very worrying', saying: 'You have your whole life ahead of you and the potential to re-offend is very great.'[/release]
There are no words.
...
Have fun at Federal Female "Pound-me-in-the-ass" Prison, fuckbag [I]*RAGE*[/I]
[QUOTE=Pretiacruento;28646198]
There are no words.[/QUOTE]
What about, "This is awful"?
Because it [I]is[/I] a very bad thing to do.
Gross.
Viewing is one thing, but MAKING IT is a different level
[QUOTE=pie_is_good;28646226]What about, "This is awful"?
Because it [I]is[/I] a very bad thing to do.[/QUOTE]
This is worst than awful, man... I mean, uh.. I can't even find the words to express what I feel after reading that article. [I]*sigh*[/I] :/
Hopefully those kids will turn out alright.
[editline]17th March 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=DesumThePanda;28646264]Viewing is one thing, but MAKING IT is a different level[/QUOTE]
And [U]making it with your own sons[/U] takes it even higher :/
What the fucking fuck
It's things like this that make me wish you had to have a permit to have kids...
This is absolutely disgusting, and I hope she gets sexually abused in prison, but
[quote]John Woodcock[/quote]
This is not the hot MILF-on-barely-legal debauchery I was hoping for.
[QUOTE=AgentBoomstick;28646498]This is absolutely disgusting, and I hope she gets sexually abused in prison, but[/QUOTE]
Yeah I noticed... it cracked me up :v:
This whole story is just...ugh. That's around the lowest someone could go.
What the hell?
[QUOTE=Overwatch 7;28646521]This whole story is just...ugh. That's around the lowest someone could go.[/QUOTE]
Dunno man... I think that woman who hit his son and put it in a turned on oven to die was pretty low too... I wouldn't know what's worse...
I think the absolute worst I've ever seen/read was about [sp]parents who killed, eviscerated and performed taxidermy on his dead son's body in order to use it to traffic drugs[/sp].
[B]I'll never unsee those images.[/B]
Huh, that woman looks slightly familiar.
[url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1063225-Anonymous-defaces-Westboro-site-during-live-interview[/url]
when shes in prison she needs to wear a shirt pointing to her ass stating
"Insert here, I won't be needing this anytime soon anyways"
The man may have only gotten 4 years, but if he isn't put in administered segregation or isolation he's going to be murdered.
[QUOTE=AgentBoomstick;28646498]This is absolutely disgusting, and I hope she gets sexually abused in prison, but[/QUOTE]
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/bc/Mr_woodcock_poster.jpg[/img]
?
She got ONLY 20 years?
Yet basic murder gets a life sentence?
[QUOTE=Psychokitten;28647171]She got ONLY 20 years?
Yet basic murder gets a life sentence?[/QUOTE]
Yeah I'm pretty sure murder is more severe considering that they are permanently dead and their family members have to live with that. Plus unnatural death is quite painful in almost any way of death with the exception of instant incineration.
And considering a 2 year old isnt even yet self aware or even has active memory, I'm pretty sure murder is worse...(also considering that nowhere in here did it say the daughter was hospitalized or permanently physically harmed)
As a disclaimer yes I think this is fucked up but I'm just pointing out that you people are overreacting the fuck out.
[QUOTE=Psychokitten;28647171]She got ONLY 20 years?
Yet basic murder gets a life sentence?[/QUOTE]
do you even fucking realize how long 20 years in prison is
seriously that post makes it sound like you think it'll be like being sent to the corner for five minutes in kindergarten
[QUOTE=Mister Sandman;28647657]do you even fucking realize how long 20 years in prison is
seriously that post makes it sound like you think it'll be like being sent to the corner for five minutes in kindergarten[/QUOTE]
A tad bit less than 7300 days
[editline]16th March 2011[/editline]
Longer than he's been alive perhaps
[QUOTE=Psychokitten;28647171]She got ONLY 20 years?
Yet basic murder gets a life sentence?[/QUOTE]
Murder gets a life sentence because murder permanently ends a life, it's the absolute worst thing you can do next to extended torture(any torture is bad, of course). Although acts of sexual violence and abuse are completely despicable, they don't match murder in severity.
[QUOTE=Snail562;28647516]Yeah I'm pretty sure murder is more severe considering that they are permanently dead and their family members have to live with that. Plus unnatural death is quite painful in almost any way of death with the exception of instant incineration.
And considering a 2 year old isnt even yet self aware or even has active memory, I'm pretty sure murder is worse...(also considering that nowhere in here did it say the daughter was hospitalized or permanently physically harmed)
As a disclaimer yes I think this is fucked up but I'm just pointing out that you people are overreacting the fuck out.[/QUOTE]
A two year old might not have an active memory but they are in a seriously fragile state of mental development. Even if they don't remember it is quite possible it will have serious scarring effects on their psyche.
[editline]17th March 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Pretiacruento;28646224]Have fun at Federal Female "Pound-me-in-the-ass" Prison, fuckbag [I]*RAGE*[/I][/QUOTE]
actually it would be the federal female "forced to lick pussy" prison
[QUOTE=Mister Sandman;28647657]do you even fucking realize how long 20 years in prison is
seriously that post makes it sound like you think it'll be like being sent to the corner for five minutes in kindergarten[/QUOTE]
she will be out way before that, assuming she gets "good time" and parole
[img]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/03/15/article-1366537-0B30167C00000578-218_224x423.jpg[/img]
I have no fucking idea what is going on in this image
[QUOTE=Zeke129;28648200][img_thumb]http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/03/15/article-1366537-0B30167C00000578-218_224x423.jpg[/img_thumb]
I have no fucking idea what is going on in this image[/QUOTE]
it actually reminds me of those islamic terrorist kidnapping videos
although its probably horrible to compare our justice system with kidnap and beheading
[QUOTE=yawmwen;28648184]Murder gets a life sentence because murder permanently ends a life, it's the absolute worst thing you can do next to extended torture(any torture is bad, of course). Although acts of sexual violence and abuse are completely despicable, they don't match murder in severity.[/QUOTE]
Did you just say that sexual violence and abuse aren't torture?
Please let that be a slipup instead of misogyny
[QUOTE=Zeke129;28648261]Did you just say that sexual violence and abuse aren't torture?
Please let that be a slipup instead of misogyny[/QUOTE]
how would that be misogyny anyways? for one both males and females are sexually abused, number two it would be a matter of semantics
three in terms of legal classification i would consider them very different, because sexual abuse takes a very different approach to the harm of the person, torture tends to focus on physical pain over extended periods of time while sexual abuse is very much emotional
on a personal level i believe the two are very interelated -since they both come from the desire to harm another human being(in general, some are done because of a very perverse desire for sexual gratification)- if not completely the same.
i also didnt flat out say they were different, i said flat out torture which includes both the physical and psychological varieties, and was using extended torture as a comparison to murder.
i would say locking someone in a room and brutally raping them multiple times a day for an extended period of time would be on par with murder as well, by the way
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.