• New Friday the 13th trailer is like an '80s-style montage of brutal murder
    10 replies, posted
[url]http://www.pcgamer.com/new-friday-the-13th-trailer-is-like-an-80s-style-montage-of-brutal-murder[/url]
The trailer does not have 60FPS. Is this a warning beforehand? (The game does look cool though)
I saw gameplay a couple weeks ago and it looked terrible [editline]11th March 2017[/editline] Still looks dumb.
You'd think the gore effects would be a little more impressive than something from 2007, considering the namesake. Not necessarily more realistic, just more impressive.
[QUOTE=buu342;51945775]The trailer does not have 60FPS. Is this a warning beforehand? (The game does look cool though)[/QUOTE] So are you saying that before YouTube got a 60 FPS feature for video uploading, everything before then was a warning? Or do you just like making posts with shit logic?
[QUOTE=GHOST!!!!;51946024]So are you saying that before YouTube got a 60 FPS feature for video uploading, everything before then was a warning? Or do you just like making posts with shit logic?[/QUOTE] What? How could it have been a warning that the game wasn't in 60FPS if YouTube couldn't even support 60FPS beforehand? How was this shit logic? Sorry but I'm really not understanding your point.
[QUOTE=buu342;51946034]What? How could it have been a warning that the game wasn't in 60FPS if YouTube couldn't even support 60FPS beforehand? How was this shit logic? Sorry but I'm really not understanding your point.[/QUOTE] Maybe. Stay with me here. Maybe they just didnt upload a 60fps video.
[QUOTE=AaronM202;51946044]Maybe. Stay with me here. Maybe they just didnt upload a 60fps video.[/QUOTE] I played the closed beta with some friends, The game most definitely has 60fps+ and it's really fun.
[QUOTE=buu342;51946034]What? How could it have been a warning that the game wasn't in 60FPS if YouTube couldn't even support 60FPS beforehand? How was this shit logic? Sorry but I'm really not understanding your point.[/QUOTE] You're associating a trailer's framerate with the optimisation of the game, my point in that regard is that it's stupid logic to think like that since people haven't always been able to upload 60 FPS videos to YouTube, and that your logic is basically applicable to any video that isn't 60 FPS, regardless of the date uploaded.
It looks pretty good gameplay wise. Of course it looks easy, it's showing off shit. Actual players are harder than actors.
[QUOTE=GHOST!!!!;51950211]You're associating a trailer's framerate with the optimisation of the game, my point in that regard is that it's stupid logic to think like that since people haven't always been able to upload 60 FPS videos to YouTube, and that your logic is basically applicable to any video that isn't 60 FPS, regardless of the date uploaded.[/QUOTE] I'm sorry to be so anal about this but your point still does not make any sense whatsoever to me. If YouTube couldn't display 60FPS before, videos uploaded would play at 30FPS. Of couse we wouldn't be able to see if the game runs at 60 because it wasn't a supported feature. Therefore the logic in my original post of "Video containing game footage does not seem to have 60FPS even though YouTube supports it now and pretty much all recent video game footage I've seen has that framerate available" doesn't make sense because that feature never existed before, so I never could have observed a video of a game being played at 60FPS because it simply didn't exist. Therefore the logic that my post claims all game footage before 60FPS became a norm on YouTube was a warning doesn't make sense because it never existed, so I could never utilize my argument before as I have never seen a 60FPS video before. It doesn't make sense to apply the "view at a specific fps" argument when it wasn't a choice to begin with.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.