• WinAmp improves video quality?!?!?!
    12 replies, posted
I usually use Media Player Classic to watch anime, however because that started malfunctioning, i decided to use WinAmp as i remembered that had video features as well. This is what made me shit brix. Usually i Enlarge the video to fullscreen, making the video often pretty blurry and full of artifacts. The video's are usually 640x480 while my screen is 1920x1080 16:9. However, when i used WinAmp, it was amazingly sharply rendered. Just as if i would've watched it from a 640x480 window, but it was fucking fullscreen! And no, i've watched that same episode two or three times with MPC, and the quality has been fairly shitty fullscreen. WinAmp did either brickshit magicks to the video or i'm imagining things. Am i imagining, or has this happened to you too?
it's not possible to enhance video quality, unless you live in the world of CSI
Oh, I see. Winamp is the only program that can tolerate anime.
Yor settings on MPC are fucked. WinAmp doesn't magically improve video quality.
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;20158959]Yor settings on MPC are fucked. WinAmp doesn't magically improve video quality.[/QUOTE] codecs doo :3
[QUOTE=lolwuttarcoptar;20159003]codecs doo :3[/QUOTE] Well i have my AVI codec...wait a minute. Wasn't AVI the LOW-QUALITY FORMAT? Or was it something else, 3gp, flv? fuck i don't know. Anyways, you CAN improve image quality in videos. But not that much it would be worth it.
You are using the wrong codecs for MPC. MPC is far much better than WinAmp for videos but you need the correct codecs. Also it is impossible to improve the video quality unless you magically have the ability to re-render frames on the fly with pixel recognition allowing it to create a mathematical vector of where to place everything, which even an i7 cant do.
[QUOTE=Thatanos;20159035]Well i have my AVI codec...wait a minute. Wasn't AVI the LOW-QUALITY FORMAT? Or was it something else, 3gp, flv? fuck i don't know. Anyways, you CAN improve image quality in videos. But not that much it would be worth it.[/QUOTE] it comes down to how the video is being rendered and its bitrate. AVI can do pretty decent low def. [QUOTE=EDDY TT;20159053]Also it is impossible to improve the video quality unless you magically have the ability to re-render frames on the fly with pixel recognition allowing it to create a mathematical vector of where to place everything, which even an i7 cant do.[/QUOTE] That isn't true.
[QUOTE=Thatanos;20159035]Well i have my AVI codec...wait a minute. Wasn't AVI the LOW-QUALITY FORMAT? Or was it something else, 3gp, flv? fuck i don't know. Anyways, you CAN improve image quality in videos. But not that much it would be worth it.[/QUOTE] AVI with the [url=http://www.facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=822673]UT lossless codec[/url] provides A* quality but at a smaller filesize. AVI is highly flexable but everyone tends to use the lossy codecs on it like divx and xvid. [QUOTE=lolwuttarcoptar;20159058] That isn't true.[/QUOTE] Ok sure, an i7 might be able to do it, but it wont be smooth so it is not worth the bother.
[QUOTE=EDDY TT;20159208]AVI with the [url=http://www.facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=822673]UT lossless codec[/url] provides A* quality but at a smaller filesize. AVI is highly flexable but everyone tends to use the lossy codecs on it like divx and xvid. Ok sure, an i7 might be able to do it, but it wont be smooth so it is not worth the bother.[/QUOTE] an 8600gts would do it better then an i7. it comes down to what is rendering it. if we slab a shittay intel igp to do 1080p playback, you will shit quality compared to something like a 9600gt card (image and playback speed quality). correct me if im wrong, but i believe it comes down to basically the codec, its bitrate, and its accelerator.
[QUOTE=lolwuttarcoptar;20159326]an 8600gts would do it better then an i7. it comes down to what is rendering it. if we slab a shittay intel igp to do 1080p playback, you will shit quality compared to something like a 9600gt card (image and playback speed quality). correct me if im wrong, but i believe it comes down to basically the codec, its bitrate, and its accelerator.[/QUOTE] It is mostly down to the codec and bitrate, the accelerator is just an added bonus. With the codec being the main handler of the video and the bitrate being the quality controller.
=( thread is sort of derailed.
Indeed, but it does answer your question.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.