[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAUsncUUIe0[/media]
Well then, I suppose a broken clock is twice right.
:byodood:
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("No content post" - verynicelady))[/highlight]
:wtc:
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("No content post" - verynicelady))[/highlight]
I never thought I'd say this about a FOX segment but he's absolutely right
What on eath is this MADNESS.?!
:golfclap:
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Useless post" - verynicelady))[/highlight]
The rest of Fox News was not aware of this broadcast.
Pants were shit.
Gentlemen:
I think we've found our Wrex to Shepard Smith's... Shepard.
This guy is getting fired lmao
[QUOTE=Matix;28122310]The rest of Fox News was not aware of this broadcast.
Pants were shit.[/QUOTE]
your saying he did this him self.?
[QUOTE=theevilldeadII;28122376]your saying he did this him self.?[/QUOTE]
'Tis the only logical explanation for such... truth.
[quote]No, it would not. The government needs to make a distinction between media and spy organizations like Wikileaks.
Not all manners of speech are protected under the First Amendment. You cannot yell "fire" in a movie theater. What Wikieleaks did amounts to espionage.[/quote]
Most of the comments are smarter but these made me :v:
Pretty sure WikiLeaks is not the CIA
The guy is a libertarian not republican.
Cool.
Napolitano is probably the best guy on Fox News.
He's still a little sensational, but as a former supreme court judge, he knows his stuff.
Hold up, wait up, WAIT THE FUCK UP.
What is this insanity? Fox News supporting [I]"terrorism?!?" [U][B]THE UTTER MADNESS OF IT MY DEAR WATSON[/B][/U][/I][U][B] .[/B][/U] :psyboom:
[U][B]Edit:[/B][/U]
Also this guy will never do a live segment on Fox News ever again. Hell, he was probably fired during the next commercial break.
It's the Good Fox news
aka fox Buisness news
This is... surprising
[QUOTE=Wii60;28122740]It's the Good Fox news
aka fox Buisness news[/QUOTE]
My parents watch Stossel.
I don't know much about him, but he doesn't seem too bad.
I haven't really noticed any changes caused by the releases Wikileaks published...
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;28122769]I haven't really noticed any changes caused by the releases Wikileaks published...[/QUOTE]
We now have documented proof of corruption in the world. Now some of those "crazy conspiracies" people used to spew are actually real.
[QUOTE=Bryanrocks0;28122833]We now have documented proof of corruption in the world. Now some of those "crazy conspiracies" people used to spew are actually real.[/QUOTE]
I liked the one about Shell and Nigeria.
Oh god its happening
[img]http://www.ingenesist.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/bizarro-world.jpg[/img]
Holy shit.
:byodood:
[QUOTE=Bryanrocks0;28122833]We now have documented proof of corruption in the world. Now some of those "crazy conspiracies" people used to spew are actually real.[/QUOTE]
The only one that really seemed interesting was Shell's control of Nigeria.
[QUOTE=Alvaldi;28122756]My parents watch Stossel.
I don't know much about him, but he doesn't seem too bad.[/QUOTE]
His persecution complex gets annoying.
He's only defending Wikileaks because an enemy of an enemy is a friend.
[QUOTE=Pepsi-cola;28123099]He's only defending Wikileaks because an enemy of an enemy is a friend.[/QUOTE]
But what happens if its the enemy of your enemy of the enemy of their enemy of his enemy of he of your enemy?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.