• Post your: Overclock
    158 replies, posted
Looked and never saw a thread like this. If you have your system Overclocked post your specs and temps. 344mhz O/C [IMG]http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee46/MaImpala/OC.jpg[/IMG] [url]http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=665259[/url] not too bad for a Crappy 6000+ 90nm chip. most people i know can't get them over 3.25ghz. Mine WONT go any farther than this. 15mhz more it fails orthos the first test.
Q6600 @ 3.4 GHz, 56C idle and 64C load, stock cooling. 4 Gb Crucial Ballistix DDR2 800 @ 1047 MHz 4-5-5-15 9800 GT 1 GB @ 750/1600/1200 Can't be assed to post a screenshot, I'm too lazy for that. also fuck your 344 mhz, I got 1 GHz
lol Im just impressed I got THAT much outta this crap ass chip. Intel>AMD when it comes to Overclocking, that I know. But 344mhz is somewhat bragging rights with anyone tryin to OC a 6000+ and close chips. Had my brothers E8400 up from 3ghz to 3.9ghz Stable and happy. but he said it was way slower and choppy. But if you ask him, his pcs NEVER fast, and always broken
[QUOTE=FoxDonuT;16825710]lol Im just impressed I got THAT much outta this crap ass chip. Intel>AMD when it comes to Overclocking, that I know. But 344mhz is somewhat bragging rights with anyone tryin to OC a 6000+ and close chips.[/QUOTE] That's stupid fanboy bullshit.
You could break some underclocking records with that thing. also what biotoxsin said, AMD and Intel are both just as good for overclocking.
[QUOTE=Biotoxsin;16825763]That's stupid fanboy bullshit.[/QUOTE] It isn't actually.
That Intel better at overclocking? Ya they are better at overclocking when it comes to numbers. But actual real world "results" are close in that sense. The newer AMD chips clock WAY better than my ancient 90nm chip, thats for sure..... I'm an AMD Fanboy, and I'm the one saying they OC better. sheesh. Still buying a PHENOM next though. been using AMD for the last 10 years :)
[QUOTE=FoxDonuT;16825570] not too bad for a [b]Crappy 6000+[/b] 90nm chip. most people i know can't get them over 3.25ghz. Mine WONT go any farther than this. 15mhz more it fails orthos the first test.[/QUOTE] I have a 5000+ :sigh:
since my 955 isn't back yet, i'll just post my 9850. the overclock here is 500mhz [IMG]http://i28.tinypic.com/s4m6xd.jpg[/IMG] after i pushed it even harder. now it's 650 [IMG]http://i26.tinypic.com/wb810p.jpg[/IMG]
[img]http://filesmelt.com/downloader/Wax-CPU-OC.png[/img] All I can really be bothered to show anyway.
[img]http://i25.tinypic.com/168hnut.png[/img] And here is my validation: [url]http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=665420[/url] Gonna overclock it more, once i get a better overclockable board.
[IMG]http://i26.tinypic.com/2ducrb9.png[/IMG] Speaking of overclocking, what's a good overclock for my X3 720? ASUS M4A78T-E Motherboard.
[img]http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/3913/stoplookingatmyshit.jpg[/img] mine is an overvolt with an underclock
[IMG]http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z94/Djsprops2/deskt.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=NIGHTHAWK365;16827775][img]http://i25.tinypic.com/168hnut.png[/img] And here is my validation: [url]http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=665420[/url] Gonna overclock it more, once i get a better overclockable board.[/QUOTE] Ugh M2N-SLI. I had a M2N-E SLI... Could only O/C 50mhz before it went really unstable. but never really was stable even stock. Board MAXED at 1.85V for the ram, and my ram calls for 2.1V Stock............. got my self a Gigabyte MA780G-UD3H. was on sale for 90$ so not bad. 10x better already. I'm Content with DDR2 For now and this board is AM3 capible (and has bios updates WITH support), so Gonna get a new CPU soon.
I got my 2.33GHz E6550 to 2.8 stable with stock voltages and cooling at an average of 40c, but tuned it down to 2.6 after a freak overheating incident. It probably doesn't help that the only way I can overclock it is to raise the FSB and I only have 667 ram.
Haha, I'm on 2.0GHz and 1GB of 667 ram.
[IMG]http://gpuz.techpowerup.com/09/08/21/54m.png[/IMG] [editline]01:42AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Unreliable;16829473]Haha, I'm on 2.0GHz and 1GB of 667 ram.[/QUOTE] cool overclock bro
This is turning into 'Post your: Overclock (With desktop included)'...
because no one wants to crop the image. and i can understand why.
[QUOTE=mblunk;16829508][IMG]http://gpuz.techpowerup.com/09/08/21/54m.png[/IMG] [editline]01:42AM[/editline] cool overclock bro[/QUOTE] dude r u runnin dem in SLIfire?
[QUOTE=JohnEdwards;16828546][img]http://img193.imageshack.us/img193/3913/stoplookingatmyshit.jpg[/img] mine is an overvolt with an underclock[/QUOTE] What're the pros of that?
Just give him a dumb rating like I did.
I don't have any screenshots because my pc isn't overclocked anymore. ( i didn't cool my northbridge so it got damaged :S ) Using an XFX motherboard where I couldn't adjust the core multiplier despite having a black edition Phenom 9750, I was able to just adjust voltages and core clock. I was able to reach 3.0Ghz stable. Something I had read elsewhere could not be done with my hardware configuration. I have heard of i7's up to close to 5Ghz with the right hardware and cooling. [IMG]http://vorell.mine.nu/overclock.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=lil JJ;16829892]What're the pros of that?[/QUOTE] I got a new motherboard and just realised that it is overvolting my cpu
[QUOTE=lil JJ;16829892]What're the pros of that?[/QUOTE] None, its heat generation with no real performance gain. Increasing voltage increases heat because of the friction of forcing more electrons through the circuitry. I don't understand everything that goes into a clock speed, but basically it involves how long it takes an electron to pass through the longest circuit in the chip. That's why as things get smaller they get faster, less distance for the electron to travel.
[QUOTE=aphotic;16830105]None, its heat generation with no real performance gain. Increasing voltage increases heat because of the friction of forcing more electrons through the circuitry. I don't understand everything that goes into a clock speed, but basically it involves how long it takes an electron to pass through the longest circuit in the chip. That's why as things get smaller they get faster, less distance for the electron to travel.[/QUOTE] Finally. someone who understands how heat is created. Most people say because of electricty passing through, which is true but not detailed. I love my science class.
4.1 GHz with E5200 (C0 stepping, lousy for overclocking), thats a 1.6 GHz increase! As you can see, its WPrime 32M stable as well :D [IMG]http://i886.photobucket.com/albums/ac66/Error404ninja/4_1GHzsmall.jpg[/IMG]
[img]http://img31.imageshack.us/img31/5561/27777199.jpg[/img]
Standard clock.Thinking of going to 2.8 or 9.Ive gone to 3.2ghz before.But just to see if my computer could handle it. Not sure,im not a big overclocker. [IMG]http://i991.photobucket.com/albums/af32/Clabrendon1/Info3.png[/IMG]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.