SPJ Diversity Committee launches campaign against phrase "illegal immigrant"
60 replies, posted
[url=http://dailycaller.com/2010/12/27/spj-diversity-committee-launches-journalistic-campaign-against-the-term-%E2%80%98illegal-immigrant%E2%80%99/]source[/url]
[quote]The Diversity Committee of the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ) is seeking to “inform and sensitize” reporters nationwide about how “offensive” the term “illegal immigrant” is to Latinos.
Diversity Committee member Leo Laurence announced the campaign against “illegal immigrant” and “illegal alien” terminology in the latest issue of the organization’s magazine, Quill, writing that those who have not obtained citizenship but have entered the country without any prior approval should be called “undocumented workers” or “undocumented immigrants.”
In his report, Laurence quotes SPJ Diversity Committee chairman George Daniels as saying, “this is not about being politically correct,” but about aiming to “minimize harm,” when reporting. When Daniels says “minimize harm,” he is referring to one of the major tenets of SPJ’s code of ethics, which many journalists nationwide follow.
Laurence defends SPJ’s new campaign by offering an interpretation of the Constitution that provides for constitutional rights for everyone, including non-citizens, saying that any person should be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. He said that, constitutionally, a judge is the only person who can deem anyone or anything “illegal.”
Conservative columnist and media personality Michelle Malkin thinks this campaign shows that SPJ is not an objective news source.
“I think that they should drop the pretense that they are an objective news organization, especially because the euphemism that they favor is far more politically loaded than the one that they’re trying to replace,” Malkin said in a phone interview with The Daily Caller. “It’s a farce to call someone an ‘undocumented worker’ who is full of fake, fraudulent documents and that is usually the case with many of the suspected illegal immigrants that these stories refer to.”
Even the Associated Press, which conservatives have critiqued for their use of labeling in the past, recommends using the term “illegal immigrant.”
“The AP Stylebook created its entry on ‘illegal immigrant’ in 2004, in response to renewed debate over border security and the enforcement of immigration laws after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks,” AP’s deputy standards editor David Minthorn explained in an e-mail. “Together, the terms describe a person who resides in a country unlawfully by residency or citizenship requirements. Alternatives like undocumented worker, illegal alien or illegals lack precision or may have negative connotations. Illegal immigrant, on the other hand, is accurate and neutral for news stories."
Laurence said the AP is simply “wrong” in its assessment.
“The Associated Press is wrong. Their stylebook is wrong,” he said. “It is not consistent with the Constitution.”
He further told TheDC that he hopes the AP changes its rule on the usage of the term in its next stylebook edition, and expects that, if the entire national SPJ adopts the Diversity Committee’s recommendations at next year’s annual convention, it will put enough pressure on the AP to do so.
Media Research Center columnist Alana Goodman, who wrote about SPJ’s new campaign earlier this month, told TheDC she doesn’t expect this campaign to be successful, and that it shouldn’t be seen as a representation of SPJ as a whole.
“It’s had very minimal impact on the group’s credibility — I don’t think many people have heard about this story,” Goodman said in an e-mail to TheDC. “Also, the opinions of the diversity committee don’t necessarily represent the opinions of SPJ as a whole. However, I think it’s unfortunate that the SPJ decided to highlight this particular argument in its monthly publication, unchallenged.”[/quote]
Non-consensual sex partners and unlicensed pharmacists will get a kick out of this.
[quote=richyz;27055622]but being undocumented is illegal[/quote]
[img]http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/captainobvious_5750.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=RichyZ;27055622]but being undocumented is illegal[/QUOTE]
I'm an illegal jaywalker.
Illegal immigrants are going to have to deal w/ it. Don't like it? they're free to go back where they came from.
what are illegal immigrants gonna do
tell the cops
lol
[QUOTE=Tetracycline;27056053]what are illegal immigrants gonna do
tell the cops
lol[/QUOTE]
:frog:
How is the phrase "illegal immigrant" farther from politically correct?
[QUOTE=JDK721;27056087]:frog:[/QUOTE]
:allears:
"Unlawful immigrant"
Happy now?
Individual who crossed international borders without obtaining all the proper paperwork and meeting the necessary regulations.
There, as politically correct as it gets.
[quote] writing that those who have not obtained citizenship but have entered the country without any prior approval should be called “undocumented workers” or “undocumented immigrants.”[/quote]
Lol undocumented. Political correctness gone too far, once again.
[QUOTE=FunkyHippo;27056021]Illegal immigrants are going to have to deal w/ it. Don't like it? they're free to go back where they came from.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Tetracycline;27056053]what are illegal immigrants gonna do
tell the cops
lol[/QUOTE]
Illegal immigrants aren't the ones asking for this, it's just some committee.
they're immigrants
in the country illegally
illegal immigrants
Illegal Immigrants.
Illegrants.
Who gives a shit what we call them. Their not supposed to be wherever they are, hence they are "Illegall Immigrants"
[QUOTE=gerbile4;27057383]Who gives a shit what we call them.[/QUOTE]
Intelligent people who understand that language, especially in journalism, shapes people's perception of world events.
[QUOTE=TH89;27057760]Intelligent people who understand that language, especially in journalism, shapes people's perception of world events.[/QUOTE]
It is what it is, why are you candy coating something that is, infact, illegal?
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;27060002]It is what it is, why are you candy coating something that is, infact, illegal?[/QUOTE]
"What it is" is a complicated socioeconomic phenomenon which can neither be ignored or boiled down to "they're criminals arrest the basterds."
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;27060002]It is what it is, why are you candy coating something that is, infact, illegal?[/QUOTE]
Saying that they're illegal implies that everything they're doing is illegal.
It isn't that "undocumented" is the more PC choice, it's that it is the more [b]accurate[/b] choice.
And there's nothing wrong with using language properly.
[QUOTE=TH89;27060132]"What it is" is a complicated socioeconomic phenomenon which can neither be ignored or boiled down to "they're criminals arrest the basterds."[/QUOTE]
Except changing it to "undocumented workers" makes it seem like they simply need to file paper work, when the term "illegal immigrant" more properly describes the situation.
Who said they all needed to be arrested?
[editline]29th December 2010[/editline]
[QUOTE=Zeke129;27060186]Saying that they're illegal implies that everything they're doing is illegal.
[/QUOTE]
No it implies their immigration status is illegal.
[editline]29th December 2010[/editline]
You guys know exactly what the term implies, stop bullshitting.
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;27060211]Except changing it to "undocumented workers" makes it seem like they simply need to file paper work, when the term "illegal immigrant" more properly describes the situation.[/QUOTE]
I didn't say it should be changed to "undocumented workers," I was just explaining to gerbile4 why word choice is important.
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;27060211]
You guys know exactly what the term implies, stop bullshitting.[/QUOTE]
And you know exactly what "undocumented immigrant" means
"don't bitch" is a two way street
[QUOTE=Zeke129;27060313]And you know exactly what "undocumented immigrant" means
"don't bitch" is a two way street[/QUOTE]
I'm not on the side trying to change a commonly used phrase.
[editline]29th December 2010[/editline]
They are purposely trying to deceive people by changing things to be more politically correct.
If you have a blue dog, does the dog only do blue things?
If you have an illegal immigrant, is everything that person do illegal?
"Illegal immigrant" isn't offensive to latinos unless theyre actually illegal immigrants. if they're legal, and they're offended, then they're retarded.
[QUOTE=Jiyoon;27061173]and they're offended, then they're retarded.[/QUOTE]
Or they don't like it when a generalization has been made about them based on the color of their skin.
[QUOTE=Jiyoon;27061173]if they're legal, and they're offended, then they're retarded.[/QUOTE]
People can't be "legal" or "illegal." That is inherently dehumanizing and the whole reason why this is debated in the first place.
[QUOTE=TH89;27061502]People can't be "legal" or "illegal." That is inherently dehumanizing and the whole reason why this is debated in the first place.[/QUOTE]
So, if we can cut the bullshit they're trying to prop up support for illegal immigrants and by extension, the phenomenon itself.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.