I hope it's not going to be like Stronghold III, I've heard it was shit.
I heard a sample also used in the zomboid soundtrack, heh.
The multiplayer is so unplayable in stronghold 3 that I lost all faith in them. All I can say is "crash, crash, crash" fuck.
Stronghold Crusader might be my favorite game ever, but I don't have much faith in the sequel after seeing how Stronghold 3 turned out.
Doesn't have a chance in hell at being good, they haven't made a good game in literally 10 years.
[QUOTE=The_Marine;41000579]Doesn't have a chance in hell at being good, they haven't made a good game in literally 10 years.[/QUOTE]
If they can manage to make the same game with better graphics, more stuff, and good online play, then I will buy the shit out of it. But its true, they'll probably either do a minor enhancement (like Extreme) or a hopelessly misdirected complete overhaul (like 2, 3, or Legends).
[QUOTE=Benstokes;41003615]If they can manage to make the same game with better graphics, more stuff, and good online play, then I will buy the shit out of it. But its true, they'll probably either do a minor enhancement (like Extreme) or a hopelessly misdirected complete overhaul (like 2, 3, or Legends).[/QUOTE]
They recently released S1 and Crusader HD, that are just the original games with the Warchest campaigns included, and some tweaks like widescreen support to make them run better on modern computers.
As long as it's actually like crusader and not stronghold 3, then I'm fine with this.
Otherwise they can stop wasting everyone's time.
SH and SHC were a couple of the best strategy games i've ever played, although there were certain multiplayer bugs.... notably woodcutters huts blockading enemy stockpiles at start game...
but SH2 and 3 were absolute shit and i am not looking forward to this.
Please don't fuck this up...
I remember playing Stronghold 2 and my cities were quite literally full of shit and the horse poop carriages never actually worked properly.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.