• German Physicists Trash Global Warming “Theory”, Super Serial.
    78 replies, posted
[quote][url=http://www.climategate.com/german-physicists-trash-global-warming-theory]In a recently revised and re-published paper, Dr Gerlich debunks AGW and shows that the IPCC “consensus” atmospheric physics model tying CO2 to global warming is not only unverifiable, but actually violates basic laws of physics, i.e. the First and Second Law of Thermodynamics. The latest version of this momentous scientific paper appears in the March 2009 edition of the International Journal of Modern Physics.[/url][/quote] Take that Al Gore. :iceburn:
I like the pun emot OP
High five Baby. :iceburn:
:v: Still, save energy with them solar panels. Who cares 'bout the environment? Fagots.
Climategate? What a piece of shit source, dude. You might as well have posted a Glenn Beck video.
I think its good that its fake, but it does show that we SHOULD take care of the planet, it doesnt hurt, everyones just lazy fucks
[QUOTE=Used Car Salesman;19293276]Climategate? What a piece of shit source, dude. You might as well have posed a Glenn Beck video.[/QUOTE] Get the Fuck out.
I never believed this global warming crap to begin with, now I don't feel like such a loser for being a minority.
How does it violate the first law?
oh man one guy could not reproduce results it must be invalid! [QUOTE=TehGman;19293295]Get the Fuck out.[/QUOTE] climategate is not a valid/creditable website.
I don't trust anything on global warming anymore because for every 1 scientist that publishes a well researched nearly unbiased article there are dozens more that don't (mostly it's just the media outlets over emphasizing or taking crap out of context).
Even if global warming is bullshit, we still don't have unlimited hydrocarbons. :colbert:
Finally some people are speaking out, I hate it when people are hiding the truth.
Climategate? Seriously? Maybe I'll make a thread about how teachers are evil with Timecube as my source.
[img]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eat-the-press/An%20Inconvenient%20Truth%20for%20Kidz-thumb.JPG[/img] :irony:
This is obviously a biased website, notice the sufix 'gate'. Not discrediting the scientists, but use a better source next time.
:iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn::iceburn: I never believed.
MOAR :iceburn:
Climategate is like using TheSun as a source
Every time I open one of these threads it's the same few people circle jerking over something they didn't even read. [editline]03:41AM[/editline] [url]http://scienceblogs.com/illconsidered/2008/09/greenhouse-violates-thermodynamics.php[/url]
Deforestation is a bigger problem. Rain-forests and jungles suck up C02 and dirty chemicals like a big, green, air filter.
[img]http://img697.imageshack.us/img697/4781/e091207petty.jpg[/img] Wahh.
[QUOTE=Xystus234;19295932]Deforestation is a bigger problem. Rain-forests and jungles suck up C02 and dirty chemicals like a big, green, air filter.[/QUOTE] Yes, I think preserving the rainforest will do more good then hybrid cars and the new completely Hydrogen cars that are supposed to be released in the next couple years. It isn't about the Co2 we put out(even if the USA and UK stopped China wouldn't and they have a huge Co2 output), but about making sure we have enough plants to absorb the Co2.
[QUOTE=TehGman;19293295]Get the Fuck out.[/QUOTE] :iceburn: X2!
People are still getting mad about global warming?
Also, don't get me wrong, I think it is great to become energy independent. We need to get off fossil fuels, but I'm not as huge on the global warming deal as I am on the fact oil and coal are finite resources(hyrdrogen is near unlimited for us), and I love efficiency(solar energy, hydro electricity and other shit can be way more efficient then coal and oil if we work at it). [editline]09:40AM[/editline] Aw you guys decided to reply right as I was doing an auto-merge. :frown:
[QUOTE=Aman V;19295317]Climategate is like using TheSun as a source[/QUOTE] That's not fair to The Sun.
[QUOTE=Funcoot;19293423]How does it violate the first law?[/QUOTE] He's saying that the current greenhouse model suggests that there's a net heat transfer from the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere to the warmer Earth (because it's a lot warmer down here than it is higher up in the atmosphere). However thermodynamics states that heat will travel from warmer areas to colder areas and not vice-versa. There's how it apparently violates thermodynamics. Simple example: if you leave an ice cube in a cup of room temperature water, the ice-cube will melt (heat transfers from the warmer surroundings into the ice-cube until an equilibrium is met). The ice-cube won't GIVE heat energy to the water.
[quote] About The goal of Climategate.com is to provide a daily dose of information regarding the world’s greatest scam, climategate, and other information and news to help you in your battle against the Religion of Settled Science to dispute their views on Anthropogenic Global Warming, and in addition, to battle the one-world socialist agenda, which is the movement’s leaders’ real goal.[/quote] Right... Climategate is like the middle ground between a batshit insane conspiracy theory website and a far right support website. Most of their articles seem to bash Al Gore. Seriously, this is one of the more biased sites out there.
[QUOTE=Golden-Death;19296052][img]http://img697.imageshack.us/img697/4781/e091207petty.jpg[/img] Wahh.[/QUOTE] Exactly, this thread is a massive circlejerk over how discredited Climate Change is while using a completely awful source. The whole debate needs more unbiased and well sourced arguments for and against right now.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.