• Insider Says Reddit Plans Lawsuit Against Voat.co
    15 replies, posted
[b]Insider Says Reddit Plans Lawsuit Against Voat.co[/b] Source: [url=http://cityworldnews.com/reddit-plans-lawsuit-against-voat-co/]City World News[/url] _________________________ [quote]Reddit, the so-called “front page” of the Internet that 172 million people use monthly, has developed a reputation for allowing pretty much anything. [img]http://i.imgur.com/lI1j0q9.jpg[/img] “We will not ban questionable subreddits,” Reddit’s then-CEO, Yishan Wong, wrote several months ago. “You choose what to post. You choose what to read. You choose what kind of subreddit to create.” However, Reddit appears to have backpedaled on this statement with the banning of 5 subreddits, including the popular r/FatPeopleHate. “We want to be open about our involvement: We will ban subreddits that allow their communities to use the subreddit as a platform to harass individuals when moderators don’t take action,” the company said in a statement explaining the bans. “We’re banning behavior, not ideas.” Reddit’s censorship has led to a Reddit user exodus to alternative, Voat.co. Voat currently has subs that mirror reddits such as /v/fail, /v/wtf, /v/nottheonion. Now an anonymous email has been shot gunned to multiple media outlets (most probably won’t release it because the anonymous claim is difficult to substantiate) allegedly written by a disgruntled Reddit employee stating that Reddit plans to sue Voat for copyright infringement and defamation: Email: [i]To Whom It May Concern: I’m sorry I can’t give you my real name as I cannot afford to lose my job at the moment, but I’ve been a Reddit employee for five years and have been disgusted by how Reddit has become more and more corporate. I can tell you that they are very threatened by Voat and potentially other “clones” punching holes in their website. They have investor pressure to stop the loss of users, even though the loss is small right now. The legal team is currently planning to sue Voat for copyright, alleging they copied the layout and functionality of Reddit, plus corporate defamation as, they say, users have unfairly misprepresented Reddit on Voat and Voat has allowed those defamatory comments to remain on their site. This is obviously a frivolous lawsuit, but anybody can sue anybody and Reddit knows they can legally overwhelm Voat and sink it fast. I urge people to leave Reddit and start using Voat and support them in any way: give them money, write blogs urging people to switch, whatever you can think of to help. It’s going to take a big crowd to fight Reddit and hopefully make them revert back to their original mission statement — or, heck, bring them down even though I would lose my job. Thanks for publishing, Anonymous[/i] We replied to this email and did not get a response. We obviously can’t verify the authenticity, but we’re publishing it anyway. We can’t stand big corporations relentlessly sticking it to the little guy in their search for more and more profit. Whether this email is legit or not, it’s time to fight back. Sign up for Voat [url=https://voat.co/]here[/url].[/quote] Copying the whole article, as it's short-ish. The plot thickens...
reddit ripped off Digg though. Now if it's clearly plagiarized code, then that's an issue, otherwise reddit can leave it alone.
Also, the source is questionable at the very least, but it's what we've got so far. If there's another more reliable source posted, I'll be sure to include it in the OP.
[QUOTE=Ithon;47951260]reddit ripped off Digg though. Now if it's clearly plagiarized code, then that's an issue, otherwise reddit can leave it alone.[/QUOTE] Reddit is open source, kind of. Edit: Not 100% sure on the licence actually.
[QUOTE=Jsm;47951267]Reddit is open source, kind of. Edit: Not 100% sure on the licence actually.[/QUOTE] You can still get in trouble for plagiarizing from freely licensed code if you don't do it right.
To be fair, Voat does look a lot like reddit just a little rougher. I doubt looking similar would hold up to a lawsuit, however.
-snip, its fake-
[QUOTE=Tone Float;47951279]You can still get in trouble for plagiarizing from freely licensed code if you don't do it right.[/QUOTE] I had assumed that they were just running the reddit code (loaded the site then it died for me for a bit, but now I can click around it again), but in fact they are running their own stuff. Seems even less likely it would hold up tbh.
Just a heads-up, [url=http://realorsatire.com/cityworldnews-com/]the site is satire[/url] (I've never heard of it before), so if a reputable source isn't posted soon, I guess mods should go ahead and lock this thread.
[QUOTE=Pretiacruento;47951316]Just a heads-up, [url=http://realorsatire.com/cityworldnews-com/]the site is satire[/url] (I've never heard of it before), so if a reputable source isn't posted soon, I guess mods should go ahead and lock this thread.[/QUOTE] That is a handy looking website.
[QUOTE=Rocket;47951334]It's obviously fake. Satire site, "anonymous source." It is funny, however, to read some of the posts from people who think Reddit can be sued for banning subreddits. There's some on /r/badlegaladvice, I recommend checking them out. [editline]13th June 2015[/editline] The last sentence of the article is literally a Voat advertisement. How did you not notice this?[/QUOTE] Benefit of the doubt and all that. [I]I want to believe! :/[/I]
also it's called "city world news", like come on son
You probably didn't need to paste the whole thing. It's long enough.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.