The age of consent should be lowered in America. It is abnormally high and there are too many people wasting away in prison for having consensual sex acts with 14 year olds.
In nations that are much more physically and mentally healthy than the USA (such as Spain, where the age of consent is thirteen) it is not uncommon to see middle aged men dating thirteen year olds.
There is no rational basis for these ridiculous modern laws. We have made many of our Founding Fathers "child molesters" with their passage. Thankfully the laws are going to be smashed in the coming economic collapse.
What is your take? Lowered age of consent for better or for worse? I should remind you that our abnormally high age of consent ages are modern and uncommon phenomena.
[b]read this to be more informed[/b]
[url]http://mirror.wikileaks.info/wiki/An...to_child_porn/[/url]
op is a pedo
you just want to screw kids dont you
14 year olds having sex with older guys are just slags looking for attention
thread music
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jItz-uNjoZA[/media]
Ad hominems for first two posts, thanks for contributing.
oh and by the way age of consent in most of the united states is 16, which is low enough
Scandinavian here, legal age here is 15 :smug:
[QUOTE=ButtsexV2;28531655]oh and by the way age of consent in most of the united states is 16, which is low enough[/QUOTE]
why?
I don't think the age of consent ever stopped me from doing what I want, I'm just not attracted to 13 year olds so this doesn't effect me. :v: I'm in high school (senior) and I've NEVER given two shits about the age of consent.
It shouldn't be lowered, but there should be some lenience if you're within 3 years or something.
You shouldn't go to jail for having sex with your girlfriend of 2 years on your 18th birthday.
[QUOTE=Tools;28531663]Scandinavian here, legal age here is 15 :smug:[/QUOTE]
:quagmire:
I rated funny, but then I read the whole thing and realised it's trying too hard to be satirical, consider that funny as a box.
Our country's AOC, is 13.
:downs:
didn't have sex
yet
I'd say keep the age of consent but make it so if there's only a small difference in age(like a discrepancy of 1-2 years) then it's legal(if there isn't such a thing in place already, not really well-spoken in the AOC laws). The age of consent is there for a reason though, most teenagers aren't exactly that mature enough to handle sex as an adult would.
16 seems fine to me, its a chance for you to reach an age were you are hopefully more mature and are able to understand the bearings of what you're doing. Different societies have their own view point on what is the right age though, I mean the ancient Romans fucked and married at 13, the female body is generally ready for kids when they start having periods so its really all subjective and there are still some countries were the age of consent is 9. Though, I find it stupid as fuck in Britain that if a male and a female have sex underage - the male is classified by law and tried as a pedophile and can go on a record.
and most states have a close age exemption, ie a 17 year old can have sex with a 13 year old
OP missed his chance at getting girls his age, and now he's pissed.
What a fucking pedo!
"OP's a pedo"
"Ad hominem argument!"
Doesn't stop you sounding like a pedo.
[QUOTE=Jo The Shmo;28531683]It shouldn't be lowered, but there should be some lenience if you're within 3 years or something.
You shouldn't go to jail for having sex with your girlfriend of 2 years on your 18th birthday.[/QUOTE]
This pretty much.
OP is 13 year old who desperately wants sex.
Kids are having sexual intercourse at earlier ages, shouldn't we lower the age of consent to accommodate this?
[QUOTE=Lamar;28531676]why?[/QUOTE]
Because most people finish puberty by 16 and you shouldn't fuck prepubescent girls
[QUOTE=Lamar;28531737]Kids are having sexual intercourse at earlier ages, shouldn't we lower the age of consent to accommodate this?[/QUOTE]
No, we should just enforce harsher penalties for breaking the law, surely.
OR - leave things as they are? :downs:
[QUOTE=Lamar;28531737]Kids are having sexual intercourse at earlier ages, shouldn't we lower the age of consent to accommodate this?[/QUOTE]
No.
Current Age of Consent laws are functioning perfectly fine, why change them.
[QUOTE=Lamar;28531737]Kids are having sexual intercourse at earlier ages, shouldn't we lower the age of consent to accommodate this?[/QUOTE]
No. :v:
People are doing more and more drugs, shouldn't heroine be legalized to accommodate this?
I think 16 (which it is in the UK) is fair enough to be honest. People are always going to have sex under-age but from a legal standpoint I think 16 is fair.
[QUOTE=Lamar;28531737]Kids are having sexual intercourse at earlier ages, shouldn't we lower the age of consent to accommodate this?[/QUOTE]
Teenagers have been doing this since fucking forever, its seriously nothing new at all, deal with it.
Its were it is because kids can make mistakes that they will probably regret later, its all about maturity
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.