Hillary Clinton is awful to work with secret service reports
37 replies, posted
[quote]“Good morning, ma’am,” a member of the uniformed Secret Service once greeted Hillary Clinton.
“F— off,” she replied.[/quote]
[quote]Kessler writes flatteringly and critically about people in both parties. Regarding the Clintons, Kessler presents Chelsea as a model protectee who respected and appreciated her agents. He describes Bill as a difficult chief executive but an easygoing ex-president. And Kessler exposes Hillary as an epically abusive Arctic monster.
“When in public, Hillary smiles and acts graciously,” Kessler explains. “As soon as the cameras are gone, her angry personality, nastiness, and imperiousness become evident.”
He adds: “Hillary Clinton can make Richard Nixon look like Mahatma Gandhi.”[/quote]
[url]http://nypost.com/2015/10/02/secret-service-agents-hillary-is-a-nightmare-to-work-with/[/url]
A bit of an old article but relevant with the election.
That really doesn't surprises me.
She seems like a huge bitch when she's angry.
I'm not surprised at this, it seems many people are becoming more aware of how fake she is
[QUOTE=cody8295;50300045]I'm not surprised at this, it seems many people are becoming more aware of how fake she is[/QUOTE]
too bad it's pretty much too late
[QUOTE]As one Secret Service agent says, Hillary saw farmers and cows and then erupted. “She turned to a staffer and said, ‘What the f - - - did we come here for? There’s no money here.’ ”[/QUOTE]
We got to have money!
Getting some real VEEP or House of Cards feeling here.
Hillary has always seemed to be sociopathically rotten to the core to me
[QUOTE=Chaitin;50300121]We got to have money![/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;W25_jgiY51I]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W25_jgiY51I[/video]
[QUOTE=Chaitin;50300121]We got to have money![/QUOTE]
You can't eat money when the farmer loses work.
That's pretty fucked up, having a person who isn't even kind to those who serve them as president?
[quote]“When in public, Hillary smiles and acts graciously,” Kessler explains. “As soon as the cameras are gone, her angry personality, nastiness, and imperiousness become evident.”
[/quote]
So she's just a nasty old bitch is what you are trying to say.
Whilst I don't think this should affect who you vote for, this is pretty awful behaviour if true.
Clinton really does come off as someone who stepped out of a comic book. With the whole plastic facade that hides a maniacal ego-centrist.
[QUOTE] Kessler exposes Hillary as an epically abusive Arctic monster.[/QUOTE]
:godzing:
[QUOTE=FlashMarsh;50300295]Whilst I don't think this should affect who you vote for, this is pretty awful behaviour if true.[/QUOTE]
but it should affect who you vote for, thats Hillarys personality. Why would you want a president who acts like that towards others? Cant even give a fuck about farmers?
[QUOTE=FlashMarsh;50300295]Whilst I don't think this should affect who you vote for, this is pretty awful behaviour if true.[/QUOTE]
What, Why shouldn't it make you less inclined to vote for someone, when they are revealed to be nowhere near the person they want you to think they are?
[QUOTE=HoodedSniper;50300309]but it should affect who you vote for, thats Hillarys personality. Why would you want a president who acts like that towards others? Cant even give a fuck about farmers?[/QUOTE]
Because it is less important than not having the literal worst policy positions and having an even worse personality (in the case of Trump)?
[QUOTE=FlashMarsh;50300318]Because it is less important than not having the literal worst policy positions and having an even worse personality (in the case of Trump)?[/QUOTE]
You know, trump is pretty awful, but at least he is simple. And you can see what he is.
What the fuck do we know about what Clinton actually wants, and who she really is?
[QUOTE=FlashMarsh;50300318]Because it is less important than not having the literal worst policy positions and having an even worse personality (in the case of Trump)?[/QUOTE]
I'll agree with you that she's the lesser of two evils here. But in any other election behavior like this would probably seriously sway my opinion, were I planning on voting for her.
She's honestly lucky she's going up against someone who's even worse.
[QUOTE=Sprockethead;50300323]You know, trump is pretty awful, but at least he is simple. And you can see what he is.
[/QUOTE]
I disagree; Trump is isn't as simple as he wants you to believe.
[QUOTE=FlashMarsh;50300295]Whilst I don't think this should affect who you vote for, this is pretty awful behaviour if true.[/QUOTE]
Dude I don't know about you but I don't want a president that openly disrespects the people that feed this country
[QUOTE=phygon;50300372]Dude I don't know about you but I don't want a president that openly disrespects the people that feed this country[/QUOTE]
Okay, but does that outweigh the awfulness of Donald Trump?
[QUOTE=FlashMarsh;50300318]Because it is less important than not having the literal worst policy positions and having an even worse personality (in the case of Trump)?[/QUOTE]
Id rather have Trump than Hillary, I think Hillary is an honest to god just bad person, no good in her.
At least Trump has a wife and multiple kids and seems to actually be a caring person REGARDLESS of anything else hes done.
I dont want a bad and hateful person as our President.
And I mean this as heavy as possible, Hillary is a real bad person.
Not defending hillary, but I'd imagine most politicians are a huge bitch to deal with from a security standpoint, and behind the scenes in general.
I'm probably going to vote Independant if it's really Trump vs. Hillary.
I'm pretty sure one candidate is better than the other- but both candidates are going to completely fuck [I]something[/I] up and I don't want to feel responsible either way.
[QUOTE=evilweazel;50300405]Not defending hillary, but I'd imagine most politicians are a huge bitch to deal with from a security standpoint, and behind the scenes in general.[/QUOTE]
I don't agree. The article itself mentions that most are cordial with those protecting them.
[QUOTE=HoodedSniper;50300396]Id rather have Trump than Hillary, I think Hillary is an honest to god just bad person, no good in her.
[B]At least Trump has a wife and multiple kids[/B] and seems to actually be a caring person REGARDLESS of anything else hes done.
I dont want a bad and hateful person as our President.
And I mean this as heavy as possible, Hillary is a real bad person.[/QUOTE]
Last I checked Hillary has a husband and a child (if not more) as well?
[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;50300436]Last I checked Hillary has a husband and a child (if not more) as well?[/QUOTE]
Her and Bill is strictly business and personal gain, that is not a loving relationship.
Yeah I guess she does have a child, never really hear about her though.
The one thing I cannot wait for about Clinton's presidency is the numerous books, accounts and biographies written about Clinton by her former aides, staff and close personnel.
Some of the worst we've seen so far from Obama was when he stormed out of his debate-prep against Romney saying "[URL="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2957784/Motherf-r-s-never-happy-Obama-adviser-reveals-happens-President-loses-famous-cool.html#ixzz3S6bfZW00"]motherfuckers never happy[/URL]" and ended up executing one of the sloppiest debate performance in history with 67% of viewers sayin Romney won and only 25% saying the incumbent President won the debate. I am sure we all remember the first debate.
So far on Clinton, she requested a meeting with Obama in the Oval Office regarding the FBI probe into email account usage on an unclassified server and went so far to demand: "[URL="http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/hillary-clinton-barack-obama-tense-meeting/2015/09/23/id/692921/"]What I want for you to do is call off your fucking dogs, Barack![/URL]" and this was before she was even President.
One can wonder the numerous novels and accounts of Clinton when she becomes President.
[QUOTE=HoodedSniper;50300472]Her and Bill is strictly business and personal gain, that is not a loving relationship. [/QUOTE]
That's some fucked up speculation, dude.
Well, shit.
And here I was thinking the media would try to give the Clintons the Kennedy treatment and turn them into a "beloved dynasty."
The sooner we hear more about how godawful Hillary is, the better.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.