• White House calls Clinton's FBI probe a "Criminal Investigation" one hour after Obama endorses her
    27 replies, posted
[video=youtube;8OALCFexMy8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8OALCFexMy8[/video] [url]http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/josh-earnest-implies-clinton-email-probe-is-a-criminal-investigation/article/2593495[/url] [QUOTE]White House press secretary Josh Earnest on Thursday referred to the probe into Hillary Clinton's private email system as a possible "criminal investigation," which Republicans quickly seized on as a critical slip just moments after President Obama endorsed Clinton for president. Earnest was asked whether the FBI might be pressured to go easy on Clinton in the investigation in light of Obama's endorsement, and used the term "criminal investigation" in his answer. "That's why the president, when discussing this issue in each stage, has reiterated his commitment to this principle that any criminal investigation should be conducted independent of any sort of political interference and that people should be treated the same way before the law regardless of their political influence, regardless of their political party, regardless of their political stature and regardless of what political figure has endorsed them," he said.[/QUOTE] old source before this was switched for washington examiner: [url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3634074/White-House-calls-FBI-probe-Clinton-s-classified-emails-criminal-investigation-glee-Republicans-day-Obama-endorses-her.html[/url] edit: More sources [url]http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2016/06/09/white-house-admits-fbi-probe-of-hillarys-emails-is-a-criminal-investigation-n2176225[/url] [url]http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/06/09/white-house-fbi-investigation-hillary-criminal[/url]
oh course there going to wait till she won the race
Snip, I totally misinterpreted this and made myself sound like a Hillary supporter, disregard
[QUOTE=FetusFondler;50488118]Utterly ridiculous, these people are so damn desperate, it's embarrassing to watch[/QUOTE] People don't want a criminal as the leader of the free world.
Obama to unendorse Clinton in a few hours.
[QUOTE=Chaitin;50488140]Obama to unendorse Clinton in a few hours.[/QUOTE] that would be hilarious but unlikely
SOURCE is bad. [QUOTE=Rules]Avoid using the following as a source: - Breitbart - [B]Daily Mail[/B] - Daily Mirror - InfoWars - Natural News - The Sun - Russia Today - The New York Post [/QUOTE] GOP War Room is video source.
[QUOTE=Sam Za Nemesis;50488189]It's backed by an official white house press statement though, more sources should be popping out[/QUOTE] It's "criminal probe" is them still checking if hillary did anything wrong, actually new evidence is actually looking into her IT guy now, not Clinton
[QUOTE=OmniConsUme;50488202]It's "criminal probe" is them still checking if hillary did anything wrong, actually new evidence is actually looking into her IT guy now, not Clinton[/QUOTE] What a convenient fall guy
[QUOTE=OmniConsUme;50488202]It's "criminal probe" is them still checking if hillary did anything wrong, actually new evidence is actually looking into her IT guy now, not Clinton[/QUOTE] Uh, wrong. The FBI has proof in the turned over emails that HRC negligently sent SAP (above top secret, and not retroactively classified) through an unencrypted and hacked server. Anybody else would be in prison. They're also looking into her tax safe-havens linked to the panama papers and delaware, where she may have violated the RICO act (racketeering)
[QUOTE=cody8295;50488215]Uh, wrong. The FBI has proof in the turned over emails that HRC negligently sent SAP (above top secret, and not retroactively classified) through an unencrypted and hacked server. Anybody else would be in prison. They're also looking into her tax safe-havens linked to the panama papers and delaware, where she [B]may have violated the RICO act (racketeering)[/B][/QUOTE] False by Snopes
[QUOTE=cody8295;50488215]Uh, wrong. The FBI has proof in the turned over emails that HRC negligently sent SAP (above top secret, and not retroactively classified) through an unencrypted and hacked server. Anybody else would be in prison. They're also looking into her tax safe-havens linked to the panama papers and delaware, where she may have violated the RICO act (racketeering)[/QUOTE] I haven't heard anything about the tax safe-haven investigations. Do you have any sources? I'm actually interested in this.
[QUOTE=OmniConsUme;50488179]SOURCE is bad. GOP War Room is video source.[/QUOTE] unedited video, nothing was edited out of context. entire question and entire answer. source to be switched as soon at the suspiciously silent media reports on it.
[QUOTE=OmniConsUme;50488229]False by Snopes[/QUOTE] She does have links to Panama Papers and more directly, Delaware tax havens. I said she may have violated RICO. Snopes only claims that there's no credible source reporting on her inevitable indictment.
[QUOTE=cody8295;50488248]She does have links to Panama Papers and more directly, Delaware tax havens. I said she may have violated RICO. Snopes only claims that there's no credible source reporting on her inevitable indictment.[/QUOTE] Please give me a source on your claims. If there is no credible source, then I don't believe you. That's how this works.
He just said "criminal" once in that video, and it wasn't directly referring to Clinton, only "any" investigation.
[QUOTE=cody8295;50488248]She does have links to Panama Papers and more directly, Delaware tax havens. I said she may have violated RICO. Snopes only claims that there's no credible source reporting on her inevitable indictment.[/QUOTE] So you have information that no credible source reporting on her has?
[QUOTE=DiscoMelon;50488274]So you have information that no credible source reporting on her has?[/QUOTE] For delaware there have been numerous legitimate sources, for panama papers she is less directly related, just many people around her campaign. I'm too tired atm to find the sources
[QUOTE=cody8295;50488280]For delaware there have been numerous legitimate sources, for panama papers she is less directly related, just many people around her campaign. I'm too tired atm to find the sources[/QUOTE] You're apparently awake enough to post in the first place, so you don't really have any excuse to not post your sources unless you don't actually have any.
[QUOTE=.Isak.;50488257]Please give me a source on your claims. If there is no credible source, then I don't believe you. That's how this works.[/QUOTE] [url]http://nypost.com/2016/04/17/the-clintons-connection-to-the-panama-papers/[/url] [url]https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/apr/25/delaware-tax-loophole-1209-north-orange-trump-clinton[/url]
[QUOTE=Reshy;50488134]People don't want a criminal as the leader of the free world.[/QUOTE] Crooked, rotten hillary for president sure sounds like a fun time
[QUOTE=Solid_Granite;50488265]He just said "criminal" once in that video, and it wasn't directly referring to Clinton, only "any" investigation.[/QUOTE] Semantics. The context clues in his speech are pretty easily interpreted.
ITT: Hillary supporters desperately trying to rationally justify Hillary not being completely full of shit How's the cognitive dissonance going nerds [highlight](User was banned for this post ("ITT" - Craptasket))[/highlight]
Can't tell if FBI waited til after Obama endorsement to label probe criminal investigation to fuck with her chances of winning or if they're swatting at a fly too slowly on purpose because they don't actually wanna kill it.
[QUOTE=hippowombat;50491557]Can't tell if FBI waited til after Obama endorsement to label probe criminal investigation to fuck with her chances of winning or if they're swatting at a fly too slowly on purpose because they don't actually wanna kill it.[/QUOTE] The FBI called it a criminal investigation weeks ago.
Get that criminal and that toupe garbage head off the fucking run.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.