• Iraqi Militants Kill 500: Mass Grave Found Women and Children Buried Alive
    52 replies, posted
[QUOTE]Iraq militants have killed 500 people - burying women and children alive in a mass grave, the human rights minister has said. Hundreds of bodies of Yazidis, ethnic minority Kurds, were discovered in the north of the country, where the Islamic State fighters, formerly known as ISIS, have staged a major offensive. The militants have driven as many as 150,000 Yazidis from their homes into the Sinjar mountains were they are cut off from food and water and struggling to survive. Hundreds are already reported to have died. [/QUOTE] [URL]http://news.sky.com/story/1316257/iraqi-militants-kill-500-mass-grave-found[/URL] What the actual fuck.
There's a bomb in a drone with those militants names on it and I hope they receive it soon
I hope they line them up against a wall and shoot them, ultimate scum.
Wow atleast fucking put them out of their misery you fucks.
[QUOTE=Monkey san;45647686]wait you dont even have the fucking right to take someones life you fucks[/QUOTE] interesting.. But yeah no kidding that's god-awful.
[QUOTE=Bat-shit;45647700]interesting.. But yeah no kidding that's god-awful.[/QUOTE] I know it sounded weird :v: im just really fucking hangover i cant think straight
Had a discussion last night with my anti-war step-dad. Even he was godsmacked and all in for [I]total[/I] annihilation of these shitbags.
Every time a drone strikes one of those ISIL assholes, the world becomes a slightly better place.
[QUOTE=deltasquid;45647938]Every time a drone strikes one of those ISIL assholes, the world becomes a slightly better place.[/QUOTE] Every time one of these fuckers die for whatever reason, no matter how painfully, the world cheers and improves.
Come on Russia, Let's team up and get these pansy sons of bitches.
[QUOTE=Fatfatfatty;45647507]I hope they line them up against a wall and shoot them, ultimate scum.[/QUOTE] They deserve to be sealed inside empty torpedo casings and then deep-sixed in the middle of the ocean.
You can't help people like these. They have no place in modern society. People will always complain about America's involvement in Iraq, but I'll happily label anybody calling them out now as idiots if they believe that these inhumane genocidal barbarians deserve anything other than annihilation.
I understand everyone is out for blood, I'm all for a good whacking or two on those responsible, but it would be far more preferable that we catch all the high ranking members and have them tried in the international court.
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;45649342]I understand everyone it out for blood, I'm all for a good whacking or two on those responsible, but it would be far more preferable that we catch all the high ranking members and have them tried in the international court.[/QUOTE] okay but then what do you do with the new leadership I mean most large militant groups have had their leadership arrested and assassinated all the time and it doesn't do a damn thing. They just get another leader because its not difficult.
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;45649342]I understand everyone it out for blood, I'm all for a good whacking or two on those responsible, but it would be far more preferable that we catch all the high ranking members and have them tried in the international court.[/QUOTE] What would be the point? [editline]10th August 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Gentry;45649363]okay but then what do you do with the new leadership I mean most large militant groups have had their leadership arrested and assassinated all the time and it doesn't do a damn thing. They just get another leader because its not difficult.[/QUOTE] I wouldn't say that. They do replace leadership but it severely effects their capacity to operate efficiently. Insurgency groups in Afghanistan have been in shambles for a long time due to constant elimination of their command structure. Sure, they can still conduct terrorist operations but they are mostly small and locally organized.
Is UN doing anything against these people? They have peace troops in some African nations and have deployed troops before. Why not now when this slaughter happens before our eyes.
I'm usually against killing people, but I'd not mind getting rid of these shit fucking bags.
[QUOTE=Fatfatfatty;45647507]I hope they line them up against a wall and shoot them, ultimate scum.[/QUOTE] no guys that's wrong, its make you the same as them!,!
[QUOTE=BusterBluth;45649500]What would be the point?[/QUOTE] We did it after the 2nd World War, did it for Kosovo, did it for Saddam, and done for many others who have committed slaughters and genocides. It sets a good message, and allows us to gain more trust with the Iraqi people, showing that we are not as monstrous as ISIS are.
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;45649686]We did it after the 2nd World War, did it for Kosovo, did it for Saddam, and done for many others who have committed slaughters and genocides. It sets a good message, and allows us to gain more trust with the Iraqi people, showing that we are not as monstrous as ISIS are.[/QUOTE] But they were only done retrospectively to defeated enemies. They're not a tool to actually defeat them in the first place - as you suggested.
Wouldn't be the first time we've arrested Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;45649686]We did it after the 2nd World War, did it for Kosovo, did it for Saddam, and done for many others who have committed slaughters and genocides. It sets a good message, and allows us to gain more trust with the Iraqi people, showing that we are not as monstrous as ISIS are.[/QUOTE] Totally different situations
But killing them constantly is only training them. Unless you wish to go about killing every captured member of ISIS, and not taking POWs for any of their collaborators, you are not going to win. Guerillas tend to not lose because the aggressor needs to win in the first place.
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;45649825]But killing them constantly is only training them. Unless you wish to go about killing every captured member of ISIS, and not taking POWs for any of their collaborators, you are not going to win. Guerillas tend to not lose because the aggressor needs to win in the first place.[/QUOTE] your idea is still shit
[QUOTE=Gentry;45649880]your idea is still shit[/QUOTE] Well honestly, the problem is pretty complex right now. Nothing can be done that'll ultimately stop ISIS from controlling large swathes of land without us deploying troops to the ground. Bombs can only do so much.
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;45649825]But killing them constantly is only training them. Unless you wish to go about killing every captured member of ISIS, and not taking POWs for any of their collaborators, you are not going to win. Guerillas tend to not lose because the aggressor needs to win in the first place.[/QUOTE] so you agree we should kill every single one of them because i'd be down for that
[QUOTE=Fire Kracker;45649890]so you agree we should kill every single one of them because i'd be down for that[/QUOTE] You have two options, kill or capture. Otherwise we'll never win against them, and they'll continue to exist.
But guys, they provide infrastructure
[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;45650049]You have two options, kill or capture. Otherwise we'll never win against them, and they'll continue to exist.[/QUOTE] Killing and capturing in numbers alone won't defeat ISIS. Its incredibly naive to think its possible to just whittle away their ~respawns~
[QUOTE=Thlis;45650082]But guys, they provide infrastructure[/QUOTE] Something the first military power in the world couldn't do.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.