Good thing I took a break from playing Bioshock Infinite(which has been slighty laggy for me), to check out Facepunch then.
i wonder if its only to 600 series
How do these wizards magically squeeze out so much performance anyway?
Yeah up to 41% boost in FPS with the new drivers, Do mind you that this is only on the GTX680 as specified in the driver changelog.
GeForce GTX 680:
Up to 41% faster in BioShock Infinite
Doesn't say anything about 660/670/Titan or even anything about older generations.
[QUOTE=Djessey;40045231]Where's the love for AMD?[/QUOTE]
already seems to run insanely well on ati
[QUOTE=Rusty100;40045827]already seems to run insanely well on ati[/QUOTE]
Yeah true, It runs on an average of 40fps on my laptop. (High settings, Full HD)
I got a huge fps boost for Brutal Legend when i did this so i recommend others do as well
[QUOTE=Djessey;40045811]Yeah up to 41% boost in FPS with the new drivers, Do mind you that this is only on the GTX680 as specified in the driver changelog.
GeForce GTX 680:
Up to 41% faster in BioShock Infinite
Doesn't say anything about 660/670/Titan or even anything about older generations.[/QUOTE]
They pretty much only state these figures for their flagship card, generally if you've got something with a similar architecture (400/500/600 series) you'll probably see an, if not equal, at least substantial boost.
[QUOTE=Djessey;40045231]Where's the love for AMD?[/QUOTE]
Ask AMD.
[editline]26th March 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=Djessey;40045811]Yeah up to 41% boost in FPS with the new drivers, Do mind you that this is only on the GTX680 as specified in the driver changelog.
GeForce GTX 680:
Up to 41% faster in BioShock Infinite
Doesn't say anything about 660/670/Titan or even anything about older generations.[/QUOTE]
Likely because the 680 wasn't as fast as it should be. But even then, it's likely the 6xx series for the most part. They usually reference 680 since it's a benchmark card.
[QUOTE=Marik Bentusi;40045664]How do these wizards magically squeeze out so much performance anyway?[/QUOTE]
I think they get access to the game's rendering code a bit before launch, then they have a chance to say oh, it renders things x way? well, we can tweak our drivers to make rendering x way easier for this particular game'. Keep in mind that the drivers are how the game (through the operating system and APIs like directx and opengl) interlace with the graphics card, so there's a potential for a arge amount of overhead.
[QUOTE=Medevilae;40046444]This. Running @ DX11 Ultra with 25+ FPS avg on an ATI HD 5850[/QUOTE]
Are you serious? 25 FPS is pretty low, and that's not even counting the dips.
Didn't increase FPS noticeably, but did help with the horrid 40-second freezes the game had every five minutes
Should I update? My 580 already runs this game at like 130 fps (High preset), it's not even funny how well this game is optimized
[QUOTE=Medevilae;40046444]This. Running @ DX11 Ultra with 25+ FPS avg on an ATI HD 5850[/QUOTE]
'25FPS'
'insanely well'
how can you even play at that framerate, turn some fucking settings down
[editline]26th March 2013[/editline]
[QUOTE=qwerty000;40047025]Should I update? My 580 already runs this game at like 130 fps (High preset), it's not even funny how well this game is optimized[/QUOTE]
Yes. And crank it up to ultra, my 570 makes mincemeat out of it even at that setting.
a 5850 running this on Ultra at 25fps is actually quite fucking impressive...
I had a 5750, and now a 7850. These HD cards from AMD are quite the lil' GPUs. Surprise me at every corner
[QUOTE=Medevilae;40046444]This. Running @ DX11 Ultra with 25+ FPS avg on an ATI HD 5850[/QUOTE]
The fuck? I run the Arma 3 alpha better than that, using the same card.
[QUOTE=TheTalon;40047937]a 5850 running this on Ultra at 25fps is actually quite fucking impressive...
I had a 5750, and now a 7850. These HD cards from AMD are quite the lil' GPUs. Surprise me at every corner[/QUOTE]
Is it? my 570 never drops below 60 in it, ever. The 5850's not that old, it should be getting a bit btter than 25.
[editline]26th March 2013[/editline]
Maybe he's just got a terrible cpu
[QUOTE=Generic.Monk;40047308]'25FPS'
'insanely well'
how can you even play at that framerate, turn some fucking settings down
[/quote]
Many European console gamers played games at 25fps for the majority of the 90s.
anything above 25 fps is totally playable by my standards.
[QUOTE=Generic.Monk;40048011]Is it? my 570 never drops below 60 in it, ever. The 5850's not that old, it should be getting a bit btter than 25.
[editline]26th March 2013[/editline]
Maybe he's just got a terrible cpu[/QUOTE]
i'm running it on ultra with the latest drivers and i'm dropping down to 30 fps at times, averaging around 40 with my 570
how is your framerate so good
[QUOTE=Odellus;40049593]i'm running it on ultra with the latest drivers and i'm dropping down to 30 fps at times, averaging around 40 with my 570
how is your framerate so good[/QUOTE]
That's bizarre. I'm usually getting 50-80fps and I'm on a GTX 460. Only thing that isn't maxed out is Ambient Occlusion, which I have on medium.
well setting shadows to high and ambient occlusion to normal more than doubled my framerate so now I'm getting 80-90
At 40-50 FPS you start feeling the lag. 60 FPS is the stable limit for good gaming experience
I get 60fps constant on all very high settings (SSAO on low because I fucking hate Ambient Occlusion) and it only dips to like 45.
I use a GTX 560ti and it runs like a dream. Infinite had a very nice PC port, kudos to them
[QUOTE=Silikone;40046965]Are you serious? 25 FPS is pretty low, and that's not even counting the dips.[/QUOTE]
Crysis 3 runs at 25 FPS for me on a GTI 580, 16 GB of RAM and an i7, and Far Cry 3 does around 40 so it's not uncommon for DX11 to absolutely eat up graphics cards.
[QUOTE=Medevilae;40046444]This. Running @ DX11 Ultra with 25+ FPS avg on an ATI HD 5850[/QUOTE]
you know if you turned off tesselated sweat drops and dynamically lit skin pores you could run the game at 60 fps, right?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.