Wall Street Journal publishes some details on the FBI investigation into Clinton's emails
5 replies, posted
The [url=http://www.wsj.com/articles/clinton-emails-in-probe-dealt-with-planned-drone-strikes-1465509863]WSJ article[/url] is paywalled, you can find it pasted online but not sure whether I'm allowed to link that here. So we'll have to go with an article [I]about[/I] the WSJ article:
[url]http://www.bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/2016/06/hillary_clinton_email_probe_centers_on_drone_strikes_in_pakistan[/url]
[quote]The criminal probe of Hillary Clinton’s emails is zeroing in on messages between Washington and American diplomats in Islamabad over drone strikes in Pakistan, according to a published report.
The emails were part of a secret deal giving the State Department more say in the targeting of CIA drone strikes, congressional and law-enforcement officials briefed on the FBI told the Wall Street Journal.
They were handled on a non-classified government computer system, and some of the emails were forwarded to Clinton’s personal email account, routed to the server at her New York home. The server has been seen as highly vulnerable to hacking.
Law-enforcement and intelligence officials told the newspaper the State Department’s discussions of CIA drone targeting — though vaguely worded, without mentioning “drones” or details about targets, should have been handled by a more secure government computer system.[/quote]
I will quote one line directly from the WSJ article though, check it out:
[quote]Several law-enforcement officials said they don’t expect any criminal charges to be filed as a result of the investigation, although a final review of the evidence will be made only after an expected FBI interview with Mrs. Clinton this summer.[/quote]
And here's [url=http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/hillary-clinton-face-charges-fbi-email-probe-article-1.2668031]another article[/url] reporting on that line from the WSJ report, to verify that it's in there
[QUOTE]Several law-enforcement officials said they don’t expect any criminal charges to be filed as a result of the investigation[/QUOTE]
why on earth does the FBI, CIA, and NSA push for laws to continue infringing on our rights without any real benefit when they won't even punish those who blatantly violate present laws?
[QUOTE=da space core;50491914]why on earth does the FBI, CIA, and NSA push for laws to continue infringing on our rights without any real benefit when they won't even punish those who blatantly violate present laws?[/QUOTE]
it's the Wall Street Journail Hillray is there puppet they want her in office to make deal's with Wal Street
[QUOTE=da space core;50491914]why on earth does the FBI, CIA, and NSA push for laws to continue infringing on our rights without any real benefit when they won't even punish those who blatantly violate present laws?[/QUOTE]
According to the article, it wasn't the FBI that said they don't expect criminal charges.
[QUOTE=da space core;50491914]why on earth does the FBI, CIA, and NSA push for laws to continue infringing on our rights without any real benefit when they won't even punish those who blatantly violate present laws?[/QUOTE]
Because only the FBI can actually do something? The CIA and NSA are spy and intelligence agencies, not law enforcement ones
I don't get how. If they were already categorized as classified material then that points towards abuse of information regardless of what was worded in the emails themselves.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.