So couple days ago I had the chance to overhear two chicks talking about their dudes cocks. Juicy, I know.
As the conversation progressed they started talking about how condoms and foreskins don't mix together at all. Now this is where it became interesting.
The other chick said that you can't use a condom if you have foreskin, because the foreskin creates so much unneccessary friction that it will eventually break the condom. Sounds like bullshit, but at the same time it sounds logical to a degree.
I can't picture the scenario in my head, because it sounds really goofy to me. I do understand that that excess skin is moving inside the condom, but I can't see it breaking it, because it moves along with the condom. Backwards and forwards over and over again in harmony with the rubber.
At this point the other chick said that you're supposed to roll back the foreskin before putting the condom on. I agree on this one, because it's said on every condom package that you come across, but my question is: Is it really neccessary?
You know, there are people with foreskins that are tighter than normal (i.e Phimosis), but I don't think that's an obstacle between you and glorious pussy.
Although both of these arguments have their logical points, I don't know which one to believe more.
At the same time the friction thing sounds nice and logical, but then again, wouldn't it be better if the foreskin was "up" when having sex, because doesn't foreskin have quite a few nerves that give you more pleasure? As in [B]better sex?[/B]
So fact or myth: You can't have sex if you don't roll your foreskin back before you apply the condom?
Foreskin is a-ok dawg.
Here comes the "cut vs uncut" war.
You can have sex, but the condom might break if you don't pull your foreskin back.
I think that the pill avoids such questions.
[QUOTE=Septok;19193676]You can have sex, but the condom might break if you don't pull your foreskin back.[/QUOTE]
I can't see how.
What a great Christmas thread?
Why ask facepunch? None of us have used a condom, not even for posh wanks.
[QUOTE=Hullu V3;19193686]I can't see how.[/QUOTE]
Because the condom isn't designed for the foreskin to be moving around inside.
[QUOTE=Max of S2D;19193677]I think that the pill avoids such questions.[/QUOTE]
This
This sounds like a job for :science:
[QUOTE=Septok;19193703]Because the condom isn't designed for the foreskin to be moving around inside.[/QUOTE]
But the condom isn't exactly FRAGILE, it can withstand quite extreme streches.
That would be a dumb as fuck design flaw if condom breaks because of foreskin.
[QUOTE=Hullu V3;19193723]But the condom isn't exactly FRAGILE, it can withstand quite extreme streches.[/QUOTE]
Can't withstand MY stretch. :smug:
It's a load of bollocks, the foreskin 'peels' back when the penis becomes erect. People know their own cocks, they won't have excess when it's on access!
Condoms split, it happens. You're meant to pull the foreskin back before administering the condom to your penis good sirs. - And no, the foreskin is just ultimately lose skin to protect the head of the penis, it won't give you more pleasure by not pulling it back.
[QUOTE=Yahnich;19193715]Well, out of experience of both foreskin infront and foreskin pulled back, I can honestly say that not pulling the foreskin back hurts like a bitch after a while. Sure, you'll get more pleasure the first 5 minutes, but it becomes agonizing after a while.[/QUOTE]
I would have thought the opposite. My foreskin got yanked back when a girl sat on my lap about a week ago, and I can tell you right now, the head merely touching my boxers hurt like a bitch.
[editline]05:27AM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Clever-Balls;19193780]It's a load of bollocks, the foreskin 'peels' back when the penis becomes erect. People know their own cocks, if they won't have excess when it's on access![/QUOTE]
Mine doesn't. :saddowns:
In fact, pulling it back all the way when erect is rather tight, almost painful.
[QUOTE=Septok;19193703]Because the condom isn't designed for the foreskin to be moving around inside.[/QUOTE]
um yeah it is
[QUOTE=Furioso;19193796]I would have thought the opposite. My foreskin got yanked back when a girl sat on my lap about a week ago, and I can tell you right now, the head merely touching my boxers hurt like a bitch.
[editline]05:27AM[/editline]
Mine doesn't. :saddowns:
In fact, pulling it back all the way when erect is rather tight, almost painful.[/QUOTE]
It's because you're a virgin
[QUOTE=Hezzy;19193825]um yeah it is[/QUOTE]
the one I used wasn't :saddowns:
you guys act as if foreskins rip off in the fucking wind
Have you guys never put on a condom? [B]The act of putting a condom on rolls the foreskin back[/B]
[QUOTE=Hezzy;19193825]It's because you're a virgin[/QUOTE]
oh
I am educated now :buddy:
[QUOTE=Septok;19193833]the one I used wasn't :saddowns:[/QUOTE]
You're buying the wrong ones
Either that or they're so old that the rubber has lost its elasticity and the lubricant inside and outside has somehow dried up
[QUOTE=Hezzy;19193850]You're buying the wrong ones
Either that or they're so old that the rubber has lost its elasticity and the lubricant inside and outside has somehow dried up[/QUOTE]
Does the US and UK have different condom brands? Given how most guys in the US are circumcised, I'd think that the US brands would design them for circumcised guys.
[QUOTE=Yahnich;19193854]Not necessarily. If you take a condom that's fit for you (like if you got a wide dick, you take a large instead of medium) you should be able to let the foreskin be pulled back only a little bit.[/QUOTE]
What the fuck are you talking about? Alls you have to do is get erect and roll the thing on, a smooth flexible bit of skin that has been lubricated isn't going to make much friction at all. It doesn't matter how big your remote control is, they all have the same buttons.
Wow retards the skin wont interrupt or break shit
[QUOTE=Septok;19193877]Does the US and UK have different condom brands? Given how most guys in the US are circumcised, I'd think that the US brands would design them for circumcised guys.[/QUOTE]
A dick is a dick, there isn't much difference between circumcised and uncircumcised. The only difference is a tiny bit of skin.
Unless you're wearing condoms that are WAY too small for you (big dick :smug:) then there won't be any problems
[editline]01:38PM[/editline]
I suddenly realised that the majority of people posting in this thread probably haven't even touched a condom in their entire life - the fact that they hold the opinions that they do just goes to show it
[QUOTE=Hezzy;19193914]A dick is a dick, there isn't much difference between circumcised and uncircumcised. The only difference is a tiny bit of skin.
Unless you're wearing condoms that are WAY too small for you (big dick :smug:) then there won't be any problems
[editline]01:38PM[/editline]
I suddenly realised that the majority of people posting in this thread probably haven't even touched a condom in their entire life - the fact that they hold the opinions that they do just goes to show it[/QUOTE]
It reminds me of the 'Has anyone here been shot?' thread, and loads of people answered.
'IT DOESN'T HURT, YOUR ON ADRENALINE LOL'
[QUOTE=Hezzy;19193914]A dick is a dick, there isn't much difference between circumcised and uncircumcised. The only difference is a tiny bit of skin.
Unless you're wearing condoms that are WAY too small for you (big dick :smug:) then there won't be any problems
[/QUOTE]
I'd rather have a dick that hasn't been cut by scalpel.
[QUOTE=Clever-Balls;19193948]It reminds me of the 'Has anyone here been shot?' thread, and loads of people answered.
'IT DOESN'T HURT, YOUR ON ADRENALINE LOL'[/QUOTE]
"LOSING YOUR ARM TO A HAIL OF SENTRY GUN FIRE DOESN'T HURT, YOU'RE ON BONK"
what if i told you the bonk was sniper's
[QUOTE=Hullu V3;19193655]
You know, there are people with foreskins that are tighter than normal (i.e Phimosis), but I don't think that's an obstacle between you and glorious pussy.
[/QUOTE]
I have that. Can't pull it back when erect, only when flabby. I wonder what problems it can cause later on.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.