[QUOTE=Cuon Alpinus;51382639]Optimized second[/QUOTE]
If it were Bethesda... optimized never.
Pretty sure ea test their games on nasa computers then
So there's no need to lock anything at 30 fps ever again.
If this were true explain Titanfall 2's locked res
Statements like this will always wind up biting them back if and when they slip up, which lets be fair here games like The Sims 4 clearly isn't ..
Just like how Skyrim was developed as a PC game huh?
I mean you're all trying to zing them here while I'm sitting back going "well, BF1 was one of the like, 4 optimized games of the year and i havent heard about Titanfall 2 having any major problems so good for you"
Developed on high end PCs, sure. Developed for?
Nope.
He's glossing over that the dev is the one deciding how much horsepower and manpower to leverage. While the publisher is certainly in charge, they have to tell the dev how much of that milestone to allocate where in the initial phases and that's when of the big engine breaking-or-making decisions occur.
Pretty sad when you think how much iteration money they could have saved adopting this policy ten years ago.
[QUOTE=gk99;51383980]I mean you're all trying to zing them here while I'm sitting back going "well, BF1 was one of the like, 4 optimized games of the year and i havent heard about Titanfall 2 having any major problems so good for you"[/QUOTE]
they are also two of the best looking games of the year. I don't understand people talking shit when a lot of ports this year have been trash with optimization.
Problem is that while they look and run like they're developed for high end PCs, they don't necessarily play like it.
I'd rather devs focused on low end hardware before any other hardware tbh
even if its meant to be witcher 3 times 50 better looking, it's better to perform on old hardware so people can get a better chance to play it. That and if it runs on a 660, it'll DEFFO run on a 1080+
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
