• Movie studios attack revenge porn law
    11 replies, posted
[url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-35959594#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa[/url]
The MPAA are such a bunch of unscrupulous self-serving wankbadgers
oh no, trashy ragmags and tabloids wont be able to publish people's nip slips and "wardrobe malfunctions". How will modern media ever cope with such a draconian, tyrannical law!
[quote]items of legitimate news, commentary, and historical interest[/quote] leaked nudes are none of these things
The MPAA can go fuck themselves.
Dear god, I never thought MPAA would be this stupid.
Again the MPAA is all about the money so I'm not suppressed.
[QUOTE=fauxpark;50065969]leaked nudes are none of these things[/QUOTE] Wow, a naked celebrity. And they just so happen to look just like everybody else without clothes on. Whoop-dee-damn-doo.
what if there were a picture of a nude celebrity who happened to be negotiating a terrorist weapons buy couldn't publish that
Uhm, so... are the MPAA being dicks here or do they actually have a point and the law's text does not match its spirit? Any independent commentary here?
[QUOTE=geel9;50067457]what if there were a picture of a nude celebrity who happened to be negotiating a terrorist weapons buy couldn't publish that[/QUOTE] They'd just have to photoshop different genitals onto them.
i'm just sitting here wondering what the mpaa even has to do with this this is something that isn't even their concern furthermore, oh no someone's nudes leaked, whoop-de-fucking-doo as that other guy said, everyone's seen someone else naked and we all have fantasies, fuck off with this hugbox bullshit.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.