Which one is worse for you?
[b]Meth[/b]
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b1/M%C3%A9thamph%C3%A9tamine_pure.jpg/200px-M%C3%A9thamph%C3%A9tamine_pure.jpg[/img]
[b]Crack[/b]
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0b/Crack_street_dosage.jpg/220px-Crack_street_dosage.jpg[/img]
Id say meth is probably worse but theyre both pretty damn bad.
Meth
I wouldn't like to say
Meth.
Is meth really worse for you? I would have thought crack, but I dunno...
They're both things I hope I'll never touch..
Crack is REALLY addictive and morish, Meth is very addictive but lasts many hours. They're not comparable. IMO Crack is worse.
Crack
[QUOTE=Anubis678;21922805]Is meth really worse for you? I would have thought crack, but I dunno...[/QUOTE]
Well. I live on Meth Mountain. I know where at least two active meth labs are/have been, and I know several burned spots in the ground that used to be homes that housed labs.
I've only had a couple run-ins with crack, but Meth is a lot more prevalent where I live.
[QUOTE=xxFoxxx;21923354]Well. I live on Meth Mountain. I know where at least two active meth labs are/have been, and I know several burned spots in the ground that used to be homes that housed labs.
I've only had a couple run-ins with crack, but Meth is a lot more prevalent where I live.[/QUOTE]
That doesn't make Meth worse.
tbh, this thread is so pointless. What's worse, mushrooms or LSD? Another pointless question for you.
It just means that I'm more experienced with it and its effects?
I'd say Meth.
If you took a single dose, sure, Meth is worse, but Crack is so morish, which is what makes it so bad.
They're both actually not that bad for you if it's pure, and you're doing it once. But in the long run, they're both bad for you.
I'd say Crack. It's known cocaine/crack addicts are way sadder, and meth/speed addicts are more happy and active.
Crack is just so short high making it very addictive.
But meth lasts so much longer, thus you don't feel need to drink water or eat at that time.
Let's say, crack makes you more evil while meth does a bit more damage to you.
It's still biased opinion. I voted crack.
Yeah, you guys don't live around Methheads like I do. Your take probably depends on where you live.
Meth is way worse. I've seen methheads at the gas station, they're jittery and alot of em pick at their faces leaving big nasty pits n shit.
They might not be comparable, but I asked because meth heads look and act pretty similarly to crack heads (from what I've seen).
Methhead symptoms:
-Greasy hair that looks like it has never been washed.
-Teeth have gaping holes/are missing/ rotting out
-Skin has scabs from the aforementioned picking and sometimes the harsh chemicals involved in making it.
-Jittery
-Generally mean
I wish people like that could get real help.
Meth makers' symptoms include:
-Being blown up in a trailer lol.
Excuse me. I have JUST as much experience with meth as you do, xxFoxxx. I watch Breaking Bad :colbert:
I used to be addicted to crystal and really I think crack is worse. theres functioning methheads, i've never met a functioning crackhead. I know people who work 3 jobs that are tweakers.Yea sure tweakers are really moody and unpredictable but their not all the scum of the earth like everyone makes them out to be. Some people depend on the shit to get through their lives and really who are we to judge that.
but yea I have metharms from picking at them, that's the only long lasting side affect i've had from my use. scars.
dun both n i dun rly give a FUK
[QUOTE=Poo Monst3r;21926398]dun both n i dun rly give a FUK[/QUOTE]
I've never tried crack, I've never really wanted to.
[QUOTE=xxFoxxx;21925299]Methhead symptoms:
-Greasy hair that looks like it has never been washed.
-Teeth have gaping holes/are missing/ rotting out
-Skin has scabs from the aforementioned picking and sometimes the harsh chemicals involved in making it.
-Jittery
-Generally mean
I wish people like that could get real help.
Meth makers' symptoms include:
-Being blown up in a trailer lol.[/QUOTE]
I have a friend who's drug of choice is Meth, and he's lost uhh, 3 kids over it, and been sent to prison a couple times now...he's currently on Parole, and still does it, I started out buying pot from this guy and he's more or less my mentor, and the only thing I dislike about him is the fact that he does meth.
From a manufacturer's point of view, I'd love to make some meth, he even told me if I wanted to learn how to cook it, he'd help me out.
[editline]03:57PM[/editline]
Oh, and I honestly have no idea which is worse, tried Coc a few times, but never crack/meth.
Some people don't know when to quit. I quit when shit hit the fan, some people just can't. it's hard. the thing I like about meth is that it got me so hyped, just ready to do anything. fighting while smacking was fun as shit.
Cocaine is worse for you.
Here's some drug dependency/harm chart.
[url]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9c/Rational_scale_to_assess_the_harm_of_drugs_%28mean_physical_harm_and_mean_dependence%29.svg[/url]
that chart's complete shit. i read a huge page of people showing how shit it is once.
[quote]This does not belong on wikipedia. Even if the data is somehow justified with specific methodology, the way this information is presented it is absolutely atrocious. Cannabis = amphetamines in terms of dependence, solvents less harmful than alcohol? Absolutely ridiculous. The fact that anabolic steroids is even on the thing...[/quote]
[quote]How on earth do benzodiazepines manage to have a higher physical harm score than alcohol? Unlike alcohol, benzodiazepines are practically impossible to overdose on, do not tend to cause liver damage, overdose is easily reversible (fluamezil), and because they're relatively freely available inexpensively, there is very little criminal activity associated with trafficking. And GHB safer than benzodiazepines? That's ridiculous; they're both GABA agonists, although benzos tend to act more on GABA(A), where GHB acts more on GABA(B), the latter of which, tends to cause more respiratory depresson.[/quote]
[quote]The chart comparing depndence with physical harm seems questionable. For example, anabolic steriods are said to have a degree of dependance, and LSD is said to have a degree of physical harm greater than that of extacy. It also shows the level of dependance for Marijuana and Amphetamenes to be roughly equal. This chart does not seem like it was adaquitley researched.[/quote]
infact, just read this fantastically written section:
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Rational_scale_to_assess_the_harm_of_drugs_(mean_physical_harm_and_mean_dependence).svg#A_Joke[/url]
[quote=Pome]that chart's complete shit. i read a huge page of people showing how shit it is once.[/quote]
Oh never mind :/
[QUOTE=griffinn;21927774]Oh never mind :/[/QUOTE]
Not to mention the fact that they could be comparing shit to good shit, like crystal meth vs black tar heroin, as the chart doesn't show quality or anything at all.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.