[QUOTE]
# By Nathan Hodge Email Author
# May 28, 2010 |
# 3:15 pm |
# Categories: Lasers and Ray Guns
Read More [url]http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/05/navys-drone-death-ray-takes-out-targets-at-sea/#ixzz0pX9srYbM[/url]
[IMG]http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/dangerroom/2010/05/Navsea-image-660x539.jpg[/IMG]
For years, the U.S. Navy has been pursuing a workable ray gun that could provide a leap ahead in ship self-defenses. Now, with a series of tests of a system called the Laser Weapon System, or LaWS), it may be one step closer to that goal.
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), the service’s technology development arm, announced today that LaWS had “successfully tracked, engaged, and destroyed” a drone in flight, during an over-the-water engagement at San Nicholas Island, Calif.
It’s certainly not the first time lasers have shot down an unmanned aerial vehicle — last year, the Air Force zapped several drones with beam weapons in a series of tests at China Lake, Calif. — but this test brings an additional bit of realism — and an extra technical challenge. Laser beams can lose strength as they move through the moist, salty sea atmosphere above the sea, so the Navy needs directed-energy weapons that can work effectively on ships.
The LaWS is essentially a laser upgrade to the MK 15 Close In Weapon System (CIWS), a.k.a. the Phalanx gun, a radar-guided autocannon that is already installed on Navy surface combatants. According to NAVSEA, the system tested (shown here) fired a laser through a beam director installed on a tracking mount, which in turn was controlled by a Mk 15 CIWS. That’s the basically same system that controls the Phalanx.
It represents a possible next step for the Phalanx system, which is currently limited by the range of its 20mm autocannon (Raytheon, manufacturer of the Phalanx, is also marketing a missile system to replace the gun). The Phalanx is a last line of defense against sea-skimming anti-ship missiles and hostile aircraft, but the laser wouldn’t replace the gun completely. Theoretically, directed energy weapons would increase the range of the system, but you would still have the gun as a backup if the laser fails to do the job.
LaWS might also have other applications: land-based Phalanx guns have been used to shoot down incoming rockets and mortars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and a laser Phalanx could — theoretically — avoid the problem of the “20mm shower” (unexploded rounds falling back to earth).
And after all, what’s a holiday weekend at Danger Room without news of the latest directed-energy weapon?
[PHOTO: NAVSEA]
Read More [url]http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/05/navys-drone-death-ray-takes-out-targets-at-sea/#ixzz0pX9zkrTw[/url]
[/QUOTE]
Source: [url]http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/05/navys-drone-death-ray-takes-out-targets-at-sea/[/url]
:science:
That.. is.. SO COOL.
Awesome. Truly so.
[QUOTE=TropicalV2;22284685]That.. is.. SO COOL.[/QUOTE]
Can it fix my acnea scars?
ZAP! That's the last sound a terrorists will hear.
I love our awesome technology.
[QUOTE=TropicalV2;22284685]That.. is.. SO COOL.[/QUOTE]
Awesome.
Video footage please.
So we're almost at the point where we can have space battles with lasers. No sea mist to decrease the effectiveness of them up there sir. Pretty amazing really.
Are there any pictures of it firing?
[QUOTE=Catdaemon;22284947]So we're almost at the point where we can have space battles with lasers. No sea mist to decrease the effectiveness of them up there sir. Pretty amazing really.[/QUOTE]
Well the power requirements make lasers very inefficient, sorry for being a dick.
[QUOTE=Catdaemon;22284947]So we're almost at the point where we can have space battles with lasers. No sea mist to decrease the effectiveness of them up there sir. Pretty amazing really.[/QUOTE]
Yay now we can kill even easier.
So WW3 is going to be like a star wars game but limited to just 1 life.
[QUOTE=VikCreamCake;22284966]Are there any pictures of it firing?[/QUOTE]
If its a laser then you wouldn't be able to see it.
[QUOTE=booster;22284942]Video footage please.[/QUOTE]
I was hoping for this too.
You think they could come up with a better name than LaWS. Still awesome though.
[QUOTE=Catdaemon;22284947]So we're almost at the point where we can have space battles with lasers. No sea mist to decrease the effectiveness of them up there sir. Pretty amazing really.[/QUOTE]
I have a feeling that that type of spacecraft is really far away.
Bzzzt!
I can see it already, rednecks with laser guns
[QUOTE=Penguin-Man;22285614]I can see it already, rednecks with laser guns[/QUOTE]
Rednecks prefer shotguns
AND: wow, this is awesome
[QUOTE=Bishop869;22285548]You think they could come up with a better name than LaWS. Still awesome though.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, what are they gonna call the next one?
OrDERS?
[editline]07:39PM[/editline]
Zing
[QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;22285550]I have a feeling that that type of spacecraft is really far away.[/QUOTE]
Of course it's far away, it's in space.
Didn't they have lasers to shoot down rockets for a while?
Why is a drone different?
[QUOTE=Eudoxia;22284976]Well the power requirements make lasers very inefficient, sorry for being a dick.[/QUOTE]
Not to mention, shedding the massive amount of heat produced would be a pain in the ass.
I love science! :science:
[QUOTE=headshotter;22284774]Can it fix my acnea scars?[/QUOTE]Yes, in the sense that it removes your entire upper torso.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.