• Iran digging graves for US troops if they attack
    89 replies, posted
[quote]Iran digging graves for US troops if they attack By ALI AKBAR DAREINI (AP) – 1 hour ago TEHRAN, Iran — Iran has dug mass graves in which to bury U.S. troops in case of any American attack on the country, a former commander of the elite Revolutionary Guard said. The digging of the graves appears to be a show of bravado after the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, said last week that the U.S. military has a contingency plan to attack Iran, although he thinks a military strike is probably a bad idea. The U.S. and some of its allies accuse Iran of using its civilian nuclear program as a cover to build nuclear weapons. Iran has denied the charges, saying its nuclear program is geared merely toward generating electricity, not bomb. Gen. Hossein Kan'ani Moghadam, who was the Guard's deputy commander during the 1980s, said graves have been dug in Iran's southwestern Khuzestan province, where Iran buried Iraqi soldiers killed during the ruinous 1980-88 war between the Islamic republic and Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's regime. "The mass graves that used to be for burying Saddam's soldiers have now been prepared again for U.S. soldiers, and this is the reason for digging this big number of graves," Moghadam told The Associated Press Television News late Monday. He did not say how many were prepared. Footage obtained by APTN showed a large number of empty, freshly dug graves in a desert region of Khuzestan. The digging of the graves was first reported earlier this week by Iran's semiofficial news agency Fars. Moghadam repeated warnings that Iran will retaliate against U.S. bases in the Gulf if there is an attack on Iran. The U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet headquarters is based just across the Gulf from Iran in Bahrain. If U.S. forces attack, "Iran will have no choice but to strike the American bases in the region," he said. "The heavy costs of such a war will not be just on the Islamic Republic of Iran. America and other countries should accept that this would be the start of an extensive war in the region." The war of words has intensified between Iran and the United States after the U.N. Security Council imposed a fourth round of tougher sanctions in June in response to Iran's refusal to halt uranium enrichment, a technology that can be used to produce nuclear fuel or material for an atomic bomb. The U.S. and Israel have said military force could be used if diplomacy fails to stop what they suspect is an Iranian nuclear weapons program. (This version corrects that Moghadam is a former Guard commander, not a current one, and spoke to APTN, instead of Fars.)[/quote] [url]http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5goykFnHZsAqRUFl1bXBuWbVNcpkgD9HGIO800[/url] Why is Iran trying so hard to sound tough?
lolwut [editline]01:16PM[/editline] Wouldn't it be scary if it turned out Iran was actually really good at fighting wars?
Iran are digging their own grave. :v:
I saw "Iran Digging Graves For US Troops" and I thought "Aww, how sweet, they're helping the families of American soldiers who died in the Middle East" [U]Then I clicked on the thread.[/U]
[QUOTE=iusehax;23959553]lolwut [editline]01:16PM[/editline] Wouldn't it be scary if it turned out Iran was actually really good at fighting wars?[/QUOTE] Iran nearly failed at the Iraqi-Iranian war in the years of 1980-1988, until it decided to use population waves tactics that scared the hell out of the Iraqis. It's possible, though, that their military doctrine is good. It can't beat the US though, but the US will sure take some smelly shit if it will invade Iran (it will be worse than Iraq).
[QUOTE=iusehax;23959553]Wouldn't it be scary if it turned out Iran was actually really good at fighting wars?[/QUOTE] If your idea of being really good at fighting wars is to throw wave after wave of meat shield conscripts until the enemy runs out of ammo than yeah, they're pretty good.
i dont understand what invading iran would achieve
[QUOTE=Billiam;23959827]If your idea of being really good at fighting wars is to throw wave after wave of meat shield conscripts until the enemy runs out of ammo than yeah, they're pretty good.[/QUOTE] It worked for the soviets in WWII pretty good, so... :v: But it's notable that the soviets had kick-ass T34 tanks and an immensely huge population.
[QUOTE=abcpea;23960082]i dont understand what invading iran would achieve[/QUOTE] Less sandniggers. Hey, you know it's true. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Offensive racist word" - verynicelady))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=Superwafflez;23960110]Less sandniggers. Hey, you know it's true.[/QUOTE] TH89 was remodded, you know that right?
[quote]its nuclear program is geared merely toward generating electricity, not bomb.[/quote]we no generate bomb!! but goddamn an invasion would probably achieve nothing but dismay
Here comes the ban
[QUOTE=sonicrjk;23960130]TH89 was remodded, you know that right?[/QUOTE] Yes, I am also black. Don't judge me.
Awww... isn't that just the cutest thing. They are digging us foxholes. Such a swell bunch of guys. Really!
[QUOTE=Superwafflez;23960110]Less sandniggers. Hey, you know it's true.[/QUOTE] I love casual racism. :jerkbag: Fuck off, you kind of people are the lowest of the low.
[QUOTE]By ALI AKBAR DAREINI (AP) – 1 hour ago[/QUOTE] lol
They're gonna have a lot of empty holes lying around...
[QUOTE=Superwafflez;23960147]Yes, I am also black. Don't judge me.[/QUOTE] He's not black.
The reason why Iran would be (or is) making nuclear bomb is to prevent any offences against it. They noticed what happened to Iraq and they don't want to suffer the same fate. Only thing that could change the politics in Iran is the people itself.
[QUOTE=Superwafflez;23960110]Less sandniggers. Hey, you know it's true.[/QUOTE] I'm half sandnigger and I endorse this.
Well I didn't want to invade Iran before. Now I kinda do, just to bury their own soldiers in the graves. Perhaps that is taking it a bit too far for a good ironic end to this though. :P EDIT: The above was a joke. Apparently people took it seriously. :(
I was expecting another shock thread. Anyway, we'll dig our own graves on our own land tyvm.
They know that America lacks the balls to attack them, so they're just trolling.
[QUOTE=NoS4A2;23960665]They know that America lacks the balls to attack them, so they're just trolling.[/QUOTE] We'd tear through them like tissue paper, so it's not the balls Obama just wants to keep his position to put this country in the shitter so he won't attack Iran. It would be political suicide, just like if Kim Dong-Il were to launch a nuke at us. But in regards to the news, I'm not surprised. They have always had a thing for theatrics.
[QUOTE=rosar0980;23960974]We'd tear through them like tissue paper, so it's not the balls Obama just wants to keep his position to put this country in the shitter so he won't attack Iran. It would be political suicide, just like if Kim Dong-Il were to launch a nuke at us. But in regards to the news, I'm not surprised. They have always had a thing for theatrics.[/QUOTE] HAHAAH AHAHA [B]AHAHA!!![/B] You actually think a war with Iran would be easy? It would be a massive war of attrition, then when you started winning they'd go to ground. Just like the Vietcong, just like the Taliban and Al Queda. You would lose again in the long run.
[QUOTE=bravehat;23961034]HAHAAH AHAHA [B]AHAHA!!![/B] You actually think a war with Iran would be easy? It would be a massive war of attrition, then when you started winning they'd go to ground. Just like the Vietcong, just like the Taliban and Al Queda. You would lose again in the long run.[/QUOTE] The US would tear the Iranian military into pieces - no doubt. In the Iraqi-Iranian war, an Iranian mine exploded on an American Air Carrier - the US, in response, destroyed half of the Iranian navy. That would be the easy part. The harder part would be maintaining control on Iran, which is a terrible thing to try.
Middle East Wars 2 : The Empire strikes back. [editline]02:21PM[/editline] [QUOTE=ohadje;23961530]The US would tear the Iranian military into pieces - no doubt. In the Iraqi-Iranian war, an Iranian mine exploded on an American Air Carrier - the US, in response, destroyed half of the Iranian navy. That would be the easy part. The harder part would be maintaining control on Iran, which is a terrible thing to try.[/QUOTE] That was in 1980 Right after the revolution. 1980 and 2010 have a ton of differences. The Americans will have there asses kicked.
[QUOTE=Superwafflez;23960110] [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Offensive racist word" - verynicelady))[/highlight][/QUOTE] But a judge ruled the "n" word as not offensive!
[QUOTE=PEn1s lol;23961556]Middle East Wars 2 : The Empire strikes back. [editline]02:21PM[/editline] That was in 1980 Right after the revolution. 1980 and 2010 have a ton of differences. The Americans will have there asses kicked.[/QUOTE] The differences between the US and Iran in terms of capabilities haven't changed a lot. You really think the Iranian military will defeat the US?
[QUOTE=rosar0980;23960974]We'd tear through them like tissue paper, so it's not the balls Obama just wants to keep his position to put this country in the shitter so he won't attack Iran. It would be political suicide, just like if Kim Dong-Il were to launch a nuke at us. But in regards to the news, I'm not surprised. They have always had a thing for theatrics.[/QUOTE] The US military is only adapted to a full scale war with different tactics which is commonly used against an actual military. When the enemy uses Guerrilla tactics like they're doing now good fucking luck 'tearing them like tissue paper'. You would most likely win but the casualties would be huge on both sides. Plus, even if the US will invade the enemy will have the landscape and weather advantage. It's just like invading Russia only it's hot as fuck instead of freezing cold.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.