• Incest and necrophilia 'should be legal' according to youth branch of Swedish Liberal People's Party
    412 replies, posted
[QUOTE]Incest between siblings and necrophilia should be legalised, a branch of the Swedish Liberal People's Party has argued. The Stockholm branch of the party's youth wing (LUF) voted on the controversial motion at its annual meeting on Sunday. It called for the repeal of several laws to make consensual sex between brothers and sisters aged over 15 legal, as well as allowing people to "bequeath" their bodies for intercourse after death without fearing the perpetrator would be prosecuted.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]Cecilia Johnsson, president of LUF Stockholm, told Aftonbladet counter-incest legislation amounted to “morality law”, adding: “These laws protect no one right now”. “I understand that [incest] can be considered unusual and disgusting, but the law cannot stem from it being disgusting”. The LUF also voted to support the legalisation of sexual acts with a corpse, on the condition that the person consented while they were still alive. [/QUOTE] [QUOTE]Ms Johnsson said: “You should get to decide what happens to your body after you die, and if it happens to be that someone wants to bequeath their body to a museum or for research, or if they want to bequeath to someone for sex, then it should be okay.”[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]In 2014, the German Ethics Council also called for an end to the criminalisation of incest between siblings, after examining the case of a man who was jailed for having four children with his sister. The council argued that the risk of disability in children was not sufficient to warrant a law putting couples in “tragic situations”, and that decriminalising incest would not fuel the spread of the “very rare” practice. “The majority of the German Ethics Council is of the opinion that it is not appropriate for a criminal law to preserve a social taboo,” a statement said. A spokeswoman for Angela Merkel's CDU party dismissed the possibility of abolishing criminal punishment at the time.[/QUOTE] [URL="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/incest-and-necrophilia-should-be-legal-youth-swedish-liberal-peoples-party-a6891476.html#gallery"]Source[/URL]; title taken directly from article
Uhhhh
That's fucked
Well, the interesting thing is that they are only for advocating for them in consensual settings. Consenting siblings and people bequeathing their bodies for the purpose. And they have a very good point that something being morally disgusting is not a reason to legislate against it, because morality is relative and that is the same argument used to argue against homosexuality being legal by its opponents. Never thought I'd actually agree with a line of argument that would then be used to justify consenting necrophilia though.
Well [I]technically[/I] they are right. I find incest and necrophilia as disgusting as the next guy, but disgust should never be a basis for legislation in what is essentially a consensual act between adults. If we go by the logic of preventing birth defects, then should carriers of genetic diseases also not be allowed to have sex with each-other? Should older women wear chastity belts?
[QUOTE=AlienCreature;49885013]Well [I]technically[/I] they are right. I find incest and necrophilia as disgusting as the next guy, but disgust should never be a basis for legislation in what is essentially a consensual act between adults. If we go by the logic of preventing birth defects, then should carriers of genetic diseases also not be allowed to have sex with each-other? Should older women wear chastity belts?[/QUOTE] Uhm, necrophilia is with the dead right? Preeetty sure the dead can't give consent.
No comment on necrophilia (see avatar) but imo there's nothing wrong with incest because, so long as it's consensual (as with all other forms of sex) and a baby doesn't get produced, who cares what people do in their private time
Well incest is supposed to protect against inbreeding, which funny enough royalty essentially ignored I can't really see how one could do necrophilia right, I mean a corpse has to get buried or burned, you can't keep it around, and you can't really transport them easily, they really do need to be kept in a funeral home or morgue setting, it's not sanitary
[QUOTE=Rocâ„¢;49885033]Uhm, necrophilia is with the dead right? Preeetty sure the dead can't give consent.[/QUOTE] I'm guessing their reasoning is something like the organ donors card, but instead of saying take my organs it says feel free to go to town on me.
You could make a fair case for incest, sure, but necrophilia? Come on now. That's just dead wrong, and make no bones about it. Making that legal would be a grave mistake.
[QUOTE=Rocâ„¢;49885033]Uhm, necrophilia is with the dead right? Preeetty sure the dead can't give consent.[/QUOTE] Hence this part. [quote]as well as allowing people to "bequeath" their bodies for intercourse after death without fearing the perpetrator would be prosecuted.[/quote]
[QUOTE=Rocâ„¢;49885033]Uhm, necrophilia is with the dead right? Preeetty sure the dead can't give consent.[/QUOTE] Dead people also are a breeding ground for diseases. Who'd have thought that decaying flesh wasn't a very sterile and safe environment. The law exists for more than "disgust" reasons lol.
Aah yes, tackling the important issues in society, like the right to fuck your dead sister
Incest and nexrophilia are illegal cuz they're fucked up and result in health issues.
necrophilia has problems other than morality but if you want to go to town on your sister and she's ok with it I don't see why it shouldn't be alright. what two consenting adults do in their bedroom isn't any of my business. [editline]7th March 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=Nautsabes;49885115]Incest and nexrophilia are illegal cuz they're fucked up and result in health issues.[/QUOTE] incest isn't really fucked up though. yeah the offspring might end up wonky if that happens but unless you think sex for pleasure is wrong I don't see the problem. wear a condom
any sex act should be legal as long as it's between consenting adults
The middle east is suffering from the same idea about incest, family's that have generations of inbreeding creating massive birth defects.
[QUOTE=Passing;49885165]The middle east is suffering from the same idea about incest, family's that have generations of inbreeding creating massive birth defects.[/QUOTE] But muh freedom tho Who cares about the poor fucking kids that have to live with the result of their parents being dumb and taking a massive risk with a kids health, what matters is whether I can pork my hot sister or not. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Muh memeshit" - Big Dumb American))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=butre;49885143]necrophilia has problems other than morality but if you want to go to town on your sister and she's ok with it I don't see why it shouldn't be alright. what two consenting adults do in their bedroom isn't any of my business. [editline]7th March 2016[/editline] incest isn't really fucked up though. yeah the offspring might end up wonky if that happens but unless you think sex for pleasure is wrong I don't see the problem. wear a condom[/QUOTE] if offspring can end up fucked up u lrolly shouldn't be working your sister in the first place. Offspring may be wonky but it's still okay just use a condom!! lol really dude come on
iirc from the studying ive had to do on royal families, defects tend to be from generations of inbreeding. dont quote me on that though.
[QUOTE=draugur;49885077]Dead people also are a breeding ground for diseases. Who'd have thought that decaying flesh wasn't a very sterile and safe environment. The law exists for more than "disgust" reasons lol.[/QUOTE] And then, the tag "dead teen babe getting pounded by hazmat dude" became top hit in sweden's pornhub... Fucking what :v:
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;49885188]But muh freedom tho Who cares about the poor fucking kids that have to live with the result of their parents being dumb and taking a massive risk with a kids health, what matters is whether I can pork my hot sister or not.[/QUOTE] The likelihood of birth defects between consanguineous relationships is really not any higher than non-related ones. Its only if it's regularly practiced through several generations that the chance increases. And people who aren't related but still have genetic illnesses are allowed to have offspring without legal repercussions.
[QUOTE=draugur;49885077]Dead people also are a breeding ground for diseases. Who'd have thought that decaying flesh wasn't a very sterile and safe environment. The law exists for more than "disgust" reasons lol.[/QUOTE] You can buy dead flesh in any grocery store though.
[QUOTE=Nautsabes;49885197]if offspring can end up fucked up u lrolly shouldn't be working your sister in the first place. [B]Offspring may be wonky but it's still okay just use a condom!![/B] lol really dude come on[/QUOTE] I don't see anything wrong with that statement, contraceptives exist for a reason. If you apply your logic to incest, you also have to apply it to other groups of people who, if they had unprotected sex, might have fucked up offspring, but as long as they use contraceptives it's okay. Adding a "lol really dude come on xDDD" at the end in a failed attempt to take a moral high ground and make your argument seem superior doesn't make that any less valid. [editline]7th March 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=carcarcargo;49885188]But muh freedom tho Who cares about the poor fucking kids that have to live with the result of their parents being dumb and taking a massive risk with a kids health, what matters is whether I can pork my hot sister or not.[/QUOTE] See above.
Okay, FetusFondler, you make a very convincing argument for incest.
[QUOTE=FetusFondler;49885219]I don't see anything wrong with that statement, contraceptives exist for a reason. If you apply your logic to incest, you also have to apply it to other groups of people who, if they had unprotected sex, might have fucked up offspring, but as long as they use contraceptives it's okay. Adding a "lol really dude come on xDDD" at the end in a failed attempt to take a moral high ground and make your argument seem superior doesn't make that any less valid. [editline]7th March 2016[/editline] See above.[/QUOTE] Contraceptives aren't magic, it's not uncommon for them to fail.
Making it illegal is kinda pointless since they're just gonna do whatever they please in their own private residences. Current bans are probably as effective as banning anal. Either way the law forbidding incest shouldn't be the reason you don't engage in incest but it doesn't harm anybody (if practiced safely in a society with abortions) so whatever.
[QUOTE=Nautsabes;49885197]if offspring can end up fucked up u lrolly shouldn't be working your sister in the first place. Offspring may be wonky but it's still okay just use a condom!! lol really dude come on[/QUOTE] if you don't have kids you wont have fucked up kids its pretty easy to understand dude
[QUOTE=Lium;49885208]The likelihood of birth defects between consanguineous relationships is really not any higher than non-related ones. Its only if it's regularly practiced through several generations that the chance increases. And people who aren't related but still have genetic illnesses are allowed to have offspring without legal repercussions.[/QUOTE] I've seen varying statistics relating to the birth defect thing so I'm not going to take that at face value. That's because you can't just go around testing every single person for genetic defects. The point is sibling incest greatly increases it and this there's no reason to legalise it other than through philosophical technicalities.
[QUOTE=carcarcargo;49885250]Contraceptives aren't magic, it's not uncommon for them to fail.[/QUOTE] Irrelevant. There are thousands of cataloged genetic diseases, but if you go out and claim that the carriers should be forbidden from having sex, then you will be called (rightfully so) a fascist. I would argue that the consequences of two parents that carry the cystic fibrosis gene having children are vastly worse than anything incest could produce.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.