• GAWKER outed out a person was gay... and the business side of things removed it... and GAWKER is obj
    19 replies, posted
[URL="http://politburo.gawker.com/a-statement-from-the-gawker-media-editorial-staff-1718649722"]http://politburo.gawker.com/a-statement-from-the-gawker-media-editorial-staff-1718649722[/URL] Quoted whole article because it is short... and because GAWKER [QUOTE]Our union drive has expressed at every stage of the process that one of our core goals is to protect the editorial independence of Gawker Media sites from the influence of business-side concerns. Today’s unprecedented breach of the firewall, in which business executives deleted an editorial post over the objections of the entire executive editorial staff, demonstrated exactly why we seek greater protection. Our opinions on the post are not unanimous but we are united in objecting to editorial decisions being made by a majority of non-editorial managers. Disagreements about editorial judgment are matters to be resolved by editorial employees. We condemn the takedown in the strongest possible terms. [/QUOTE] What is also funny is Jezebel, also a GAWKER affiliate, was rubbed the wrong way.
GAWKER
These people have no morals, they're only out to make money and they'll pander to every demographic just to cover every demographic. Fuck these people.
Here's what pisses me off... In America Gay Marriage is legal... however you could get FIRED for being gay... and Gawker just outed a person.
[QUOTE=OmniConsUme;48238596]Here's what pisses me off... In America Gay Marriage is legal... however you could get FIRED for being gay... and Gawker just outed a person.[/QUOTE] Ya congress has been sitting on its ass for some time now to keep gays and lgbt in general from being covered by federal antidiscrimination laws, but now that gay marriage is legal...they are going to have some explaining to do if they don't get their shit together and or the courts step up the pressure
Hell even SJW's are pissed... about the article.
I hope Hulk Hogan razes Gawker to the ground. That whole organization is rotten.
[QUOTE=OmniConsUme;48238816]Hell even SJW's are pissed... about the article.[/QUOTE] SJWs are pissed about their own existence too, them being pissed means nothing.
[QUOTE=OmniConsUme;48238816]Hell even SJW's are pissed... about the article.[/QUOTE] Honestly, SJW's are pissed about everything. They can not possibly ever be happy unless every straight white male suddenly dies or something.
[QUOTE=Pilot1215;48238937]Honestly, SJW's are pissed about everything. They can not possibly ever be happy unless every straight white male suddenly dies or something.[/QUOTE] That could make a good mockumentary. "A Day Without a Trigger"
[QUOTE=Pilot1215;48238937]Honestly, SJW's are pissed about everything. They can not possibly ever be happy unless every straight white male suddenly dies or something.[/QUOTE] did this thread revert to late 2013
[QUOTE=geogzm;48239821]did this thread revert to late 2013[/QUOTE] Not to go further off topic on the tangent of SJWs but they're still a massive fucking annoyance.
Gawker outed a person as gay in order to help another individual that was blackmailing said person for money. THAT is the problem.
[QUOTE=Snickerdoodle;48240074]Not to go further off topic on the tangent of SJWs but they're still a massive fucking annoyance.[/QUOTE] Sjws are gawkers audience and I'm pretty sure they populate Gawker itself. I can't see a company doing the insane stuff that Gawker is currently doing without some ideological drive behind it. If it were all about money they'd back up and stop. The business side of the company obviously wants to reign them in judging by the fact that they took down the story and I hope they do. [url]http://i.imgur.com/Z6pTZKw.jpg[/url]
how did you twits so efficiently flop the thread into bitching about SJWs existing
SJW or internet shitlord hate machine, it doesn't matter, why would anyone support a news site that's the engine of gossip and stupidity?
[QUOTE=dai;48241596]how did you twits so efficiently flop the thread into bitching about SJWs existing[/QUOTE] Is this your first time in SH or something? No, but seriously, gawker is like the church of SJW. Hell, it even causes "social issues" to leak into their sites (like gizmodo) which have nothing to do with social issues.
[QUOTE=Silence I Kill You;48241627]Is this your first time in SH or something? No, but seriously, gawker is like the church of SJW. Hell, it even causes "social issues" to leak into their sites (like gizmodo) which have nothing to do with social issues.[/QUOTE] you appear to have mistaken my post as genuine confusion [editline]e[/editline] if you're still confused, it was a warning shot. SJWs were shoehorned into conversation, talk about Gawker fighting to uphold its shit-eating status
Gawker is a horrible, shitty company, no denying that. I'm still waiting for Hogan to take them in court (because I doubt he'd settle out of court, he has enough money already- he wants to see this site taken to the ground) In regards to the SJW conversation that popped up in the thread, while it's true they've sided with each other in the past, I've seen even the dumbest of anti-ggs find this act of gawker to be disgusting. So yeah, Gawker is shit, no matter who you think sides with them.
[QUOTE=Bridger;48239365]That could make a good mockumentary. "A Day Without a Trigger"[/QUOTE] hey careful there thats my trigger phrase
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.