• James Cameron's Avatar: The Game Now Available
    24 replies, posted
[url]http://store.steampowered.com/news/3186/[/url]
dances with smurfs: the game
IGN gave it a 6.0, saying that the gameplay is quite bad.
Well good for IGN.
[QUOTE=Rooster Assassin;18683864]Well good for IGN.[/QUOTE] Just trying to warn peeps about it.
I think it looks cool.
I tend to never get my hopes up for a game marketed for a movie.
I just lost the game. Also I thought this was that one "Avatar" game.
Avatar :downs:
Cameron said himself it would be kickass.
this: alien planet pandora borderlands: alien planet pandora um
[QUOTE=MachiniOs;18684802]Cameron said himself it would be kickass.[/QUOTE] :roflolmao:
I played the Demo, I loved it... The lush environments are beautiful...
I actually loved the demo, IGN, can't trust those fuckers since they gave Halo 3 the same score and Grand Theft Auto IV a higher rating than [b]THE FUCKING ORANGE BOX[/b].
I thought that Avatar: The Movie was based on that anime of the same name for quite some time. I guess I was wrong. Also, just watched a gameplay vid on Youtube, looks pretty nice.
[QUOTE=NotYou3;18684825]this: alien planet pandora borderlands: alien planet pandora um[/QUOTE] avatar before brolands
Gamespot gave this 5.5, though not that they're all the credible. Everywhere else seems to rate this at bad or barely average. Probably not worth the $50
I saw this earlier today at BestBuy while looking for mice when a friend pointed it out and went. "No way, it'll be shit." Guess I was right.
Purchased.
[QUOTE=Ziron;18692787]Purchased.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://img34.imageshack.us/img34/5468/wutsa.jpg[/IMG]
Ha! IGN changed their reviews. I read the 6.0 one, and it really rode down on the game, basically saying the Na'vi campaign was utter shit but never really giving a reason why beyond monotony. This new one - which rates 6.8 - seems more fair to the game.
[QUOTE=MachiniOs;18684802]Cameron said himself it would be kickass.[/QUOTE] Cameron obviously doesn't know much about video games then.
[QUOTE=OpethRockr55;18694468]Ha! IGN changed their reviews. I read the 6.0 one, and it really rode down on the game, basically saying the Na'vi campaign was utter shit but never really giving a reason why beyond monotony. This new one - which rates 6.8 - seems more fair to the game.[/QUOTE] That's the ultimate sign of bad reviewing.
[QUOTE=zpiscool;18694540]Cameron obviously doesn't know much about video games then.[/QUOTE] But he coded it himself. With Lisp.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.