• 3D's 'positive impact' on pupils
    15 replies, posted
[url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/int/news/-/news/technology-15115059[/url]
yeah it works until it becomes incredibly boring and routine once the gimmick effect wears off.
Isn't our whole life considered 3D? [editline]30th September 2011[/editline] 3D is so gimmick. I guess we have to wait till movies start to show in hologram.
Did anyone else think the title was talking about the eyes?
It's hardly the 3D at all doing this. It's just that people are slightly amazed by 3D effects and pay more attention because the 3D effects are pretty.
[QUOTE=Jo The Shmo;32540802]yeah it works until it becomes incredibly boring and routine once the gimmick effect wears off.[/QUOTE]I thought it got boring when Spy Kids had their first 3D movie.
[QUOTE=Giacomand;32541911]Did anyone else think the title was talking about the eyes?[/QUOTE] I thought it was some kind of vision enhancement aid they were talking about.
"Let's don't care about people w/o steroscopic vision" :downs: [editline]29th September 2011[/editline] And those who have to wear glasses
Whatever happened to anaglyph 3d? It worked so much better than polarized does.
[QUOTE=Atlascore;32541599]Yes, we're in the third dimension in case you haven't noticed, you can move things up and down right? :v:[/QUOTE] up and down aren't 3rd dimension they're 2nd
Yeah, stereo-optical video turns all students into amazing gods of knowledge :downs:
Know what's even more real than 3D? Watching a fucking stage performance.
[QUOTE=Watevaman;32548555]up and down aren't 3rd dimension they're 2nd[/QUOTE] No, not necessarily.
Most people's eyes get strain from watching 3D viewing for too long. I have a 3DS and playing Ocarina of Time in 3D mode strains the eye after 15 minutes. 3D is only good for short time but viewing it too long is bad for your eyes.
[QUOTE=BCell;32541569]Isn't our whole life considered 3D?[/QUOTE] It is 4D if you add time.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.