Great, It's been fun FullHD but I'm getting tired of not being able to find any 22" monitors that aren't just televisions.
I'd imagine GPU architecture will be overhauled to put more emphasis on areas like memory bandwidth which will allow for better 4K gaming once it enters the mainstream more, so you won't need 3 $1000 Titans to just run Metro:LL.
And here I am, on my 8 year old 5:4
RPS needs to stop making tech articles. They perpetuate the idea that everything has to be expensive, or you have to have an amazing system to do anything.
I effectively run 4k games on my machine at times, and I'm on dual 580's but I'm also maxing out those titles. A 680 could play many games in 4k on high settings with FXAA only.
[QUOTE=Brt5470;42284596]RPS needs to stop making tech articles. They perpetuate the idea that everything has to be expensive, or you have to have an amazing system to do anything.
I effectively run 4k games on my machine at times, and I'm on dual 580's but I'm also maxing out those titles. A 680 could play many games in 4k on high settings with FXAA only.[/QUOTE]
My 680 seems to shit itself when I go to really high res, I imagine its a bandwidth issue.
[QUOTE=Brt5470;42284596]RPS needs to stop making tech articles. They perpetuate the idea that everything has to be expensive, or you have to have an amazing system to do anything.
I effectively run 4k games on my machine at times, and I'm on dual 580's but I'm also maxing out those titles. A 680 could play many games in 4k on high settings with FXAA only.[/QUOTE]
Pretty much.
Not only are they late as fuck, but the actually-done-by-someone-who-understands-english anandtech and [H]OCP articles pretty much contradict most of it.
[quote] bandwidth and memory [/quote] are the main concerns.
There's really no use in 4K gaming yet anyway until the new HDMI/DS standard drops next year anyway, and you can get a single cable in any flavor to handle the load.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.