[QUOTE=booster;20449052]Lack of "Epic"? What?[/QUOTE]Looks like they were surprised that it wasn't Modern Warfare 2.
Which is a good thing.
Wow what a surprise the singleplayer in a battlefield game is nothing special.
If you get a battlefield game for its singleplayer you're a fucking moron.
"lot less annoying than last time around"
What the fuck? They weren't annoying at all if anything they were hilarious
[QUOTE=j-richardson;20449337]"lot less annoying than last time around"
What the fuck? They weren't annoying at all if anything they were hilarious[/QUOTE]
Those guys have no sense of humor at all so it seems.
IGN has always busted balls.
IGN is owned by the same company as Fox News, so they should be discounted in opinion just like Fox News.
[QUOTE=Banned?;20449556]IGN is owned by the same company as Fox News, so they should be discounted in opinion just like Fox News.[/QUOTE]
Amen brother.
[QUOTE=booster;20449052]Lack of "Epic"? What?[/QUOTE]
It's true. I got the game early from a store and singleplayer is just like playing with bots. Then cutscene. Then playing with bots again.
[editline]03:40PM[/editline]
But it's not annoying and fun, so I'm happy.
Well it's the multiplayer that matters in a battlefield game.
[QUOTE=-TRASE-;20449833]It's true. I got the game early from a store and singleplayer is just like playing with bots. Then cutscene. Then playing with bots again.[/QUOTE]
How is this different from any other battlefield game's singleplayer
If you were expecting anything good from the singleplayer then you deserve to be let down.
Bear in mind, they're playing the 8v8 16 player multiplayer, not 16v16 32 player multiplayer. That and the only people online at this stage are those who are reviewing the game, or have gotten it early.
I think half the player numbers probably does remove a lot of the epic feel.
Half these points are pefectly applicable to modern fucking warfare 2. IGN are so stupid sometime.
[editline]02:13PM[/editline]
sometimes.
"Legitimate contender to Modern Warfare's throne"
I'm sick of everyone looking at CoD like it is the end all of first person shooters.
I've played Modern Warfare 1 and 2, and they are both excellent games, but I wouldn't
consider them the best FPS games that money can buy.
It's starting to annoy me how everyone keeps comparing this to CoD, fuck that shit.
This is so much better then Call of duty. It's better in every way. They should be comparing Call of duty TO Bad company 2!
[QUOTE=gmaster;20449899]Bear in mind, they're playing the 8v8 16 player multiplayer, not 16v16 32 player multiplayer. That and the only people online at this stage are those who are reviewing the game, or have gotten it early.
I think half the player numbers probably does remove a lot of the epic feel.[/QUOTE]
Wait what? It's 12 v 12 on consoles, not 8 v 8.
[QUOTE=Karmah;20450451]This is so much better then Call of duty. It's better in every way. They should be comparing Call of duty TO Bad company 2![/QUOTE]
(The other way around, comparing how little cod is to battlefield)
That review was full of contradictions.
I really dislike IGN reviews.
[editline]10:11AM[/editline]
and I liked BC1 single player, it wasn't great but it was still fun to play.
Lol ign. They said Napoleon Total war was shit, it was awesome.
So they say 6 hours of SP is not worth the money. Wow. Did they say the same thing for the 4 hours of MW2?
[QUOTE=Killuah;20450815]So they say 6 hours of SP is not worth the money. Wow. Did they say the same thing for the 4 hours of MW2?[/QUOTE]
no cause they're completely biased.
if they found the characters in BC1 annoying, they're idiots. They obviously don't know it's wise to keep cracking jokes off when your life is in the midst of ending, keeps morale up.
They wouldn't know a good game if it bite them in the ass and shoved a grenade in their mouth.
They didn't even talk about the sound?
Fucking IGN, useless gits.
[QUOTE=SatansSin;20450967]no cause they're completely biased.
if they found the characters in BC1 annoying, they're idiots. They obviously don't know it's wise to keep cracking jokes off when your life is in the midst of ending, keeps morale up.
They wouldn't know a good game if it bite them in the ass and shoved a grenade in their mouth.[/QUOTE]
They have their opinion and I respect that. After all they are not the pope of gaming so I'm fine with their review. I just don't like that they use the same basis for rating , yet leaving out the vehicle action and general different gameplay of BC2.
Now watch the MW2 review and see how his views are "different".
IGN: it isn't mw2
[QUOTE=-TRASE-;20449833]It's true. I got the game early from a store and singleplayer [B]is just like playing with bots.[/B] Then cutscene. Then playing with bots again.
[editline]03:40PM[/editline]
But it's not annoying and fun, so I'm happy.[/QUOTE]
You expected them to be real people?
you can't spell ignorant without IGN.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.