Mother forced to pay $1,300 a month spousal support to ex-husband convicted of raping her daughter - Polidicks

[QUOTE]A mother whose husband was jailed for repeatedly raping her young daughter for 16 years, was forced to pay him spousal support after their divorce and is being asked for back payments now that he has been released from jail. [/QUOTE] [URL="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2320799/Mother-forced-pay-1-300-month-spousal-support-ex-husband-convicted-raping-daughter.html#comments"]Source[/URL] WUT

wot no that's terrible

Crazy stuff...

How is this not instantly solved by a judge? It's clear the legal decision that was made is completely bollocks given the acts that transpired for 16 goddamned years.

Justice system is a joke. No, it is a bad joke. A really bad joke. And that is an understatement.

What the actual fuck.

That is some serious fucking bull[i]SHIT[/i]

Sauce that isn't the daily mail.

Daily Fail, find a real source.

no no there making this up this a joke right right.?

What i want to know is why the fuck this guy was ever released from prison in the first place... He RAPED his DAUGHTER for SIXTEEN years... [editline]7th May 2013[/editline] Ray-The-Sun: How is it dumb that i think a child rapist should still be in prison...?

California has some strange rules regarding divorce. Being able to collect palimony after pleading guilty to molesting your step daughter takes the fucking absurd cake.

Why is america's law so retarded when it comes to divorce?

[QUOTE=Used Car Salesman;40563123]Daily Fail, find a real source.[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57583309/woman-forced-to-pay-spousal-support-to-ex-who-raped-her-daughter/[/url]

[QUOTE=Scot;40564355]Why is america's law so retarded when it comes to divorce?[/QUOTE] Fun fact: there hasn't actually been any ruling in this case. Or any trial. "And under California law, child abuse is not specifically mentioned. Given Abar never abused his wife, the judge [B]could [/B]rule in his favor". No judge will rule this.

can't they throw the book at him?

[QUOTE=Scot;40564355]Why is america's law so retarded when it comes to divorce?[/QUOTE] Law makers are lazy/corrupt and focus on random issues or issues the public at large demand be looked into.

Reminds me of rapists suing their victims for child support D: This really blows

[QUOTE=Foda;40564424]Fun fact: there hasn't actually been any ruling in this case. Or any trial. "And under California law, child abuse is not specifically mentioned. Given Abar never abused his wife, the judge [B]could [/B]rule in his favor". No judge will rule this.[/QUOTE] Exactly. She had to pay in the period between when she divorced him and when he actually plead guilty to the crime. If she hadn't filed for divorce before the conviction she wouldn't have had to pay a dime. This woman obviously made an emotional decision without contacting a lawyer and consider the consequences. Sucks for her. I actually agree with the first judge that, without a conviction or real 3rd party evidence, it's completely her word against his. If you're a judge and preside over divorce proceedings all the time, how much bullshit do you hear people say about each other? You gotta have something concrete to go on, otherwise it's just some bitch saying whatever she thinks will get her out of paying alimony, or vise versa. Granted, in this case it was true, but you can't take at face value what a couple of pissed-off soon-to-be-exes say about each other. A ruling that she pay all the back alimony plus resume monthly payments would be insane, but that [i]hasn't happened yet[/i]. But hey, that doesn't stop CBS and Daily Fail from running with the "Forced to pay support to rapist" headline.

A friend of mine lost custody to her ex-husband just because the child had bad grades. The ex-husband has a record of beating up his girlfriends(went to jail multiple times), running over children, and even bruising the one he got custody of. But the only reason my friend couldn't get custody-- is because his "bad grades"

I don't know about the time spent in jail, but now that he's out he has the same rights as any other person.