• My 4th photo on a dSLR
    46 replies, posted
[b][highlight]WARNING: FUCKING HUGE IMAGE (4752px × 3168px) AHOY[/highlight][/b] [url]http://twitpic.com/cmukx/full[/url] (it doesn't seem to want to embed properly) Even I'm impressed. Canon 500D - 18-55mm lens at about 10pm ish. Might post some more later.
[QUOTE=leach139;16457722][img]http://twitpic.com/cmukx/full[/img] Even I'm impressed. Canon 500D - 18-55mm lens at about 10pm ish. Might post some more later.[/QUOTE] Fixed: [media]http://web10.twitpic.com/img/21221457-e83727277a33ed0673e557003a8cf11c.4a770df8-full.jpg[/media]
dONTFUCKINGPOSTTHATWHATTHEFUCKAREYOUDOINGAHHHHHH Now you made me sad
That's an incredibly good photograph, mr duck.
Spammed link on Steam much. Edit: Huge photo is huge. Edit: That's pretty good but it's not because of you it's because the camera's quality is great. You might want to try: 1. shooting at a completely different time of day 2. shooting from a different angle. as a general rule, try to capture subjects from angles you don't see every day: you might want to photograph a leaf from underneath. 3. seriously, it's a nature shot, don't shoot it at night ps: luadick
please make it smaller
smaller: [url]http://twitpic.com/cmukx[/url]
Good picture but could use better lighting.
The only external flash I have overexposes every single time even if I have a really fast shutter speed
[QUOTE=leach139;16457950]The only external flash I have overexposes every single time even if I have a really fast shutter speed[/QUOTE] But you don't even have to use one. Again, just pick an appropriate time of day and f-stop/exposure.
brb, gunna go shoot it again in light and see how it comes out
It's almost as if you went up to a plant and accidentally took a picture in automatic settings?
[url]http://twitpic.com/cmzep[/url] [url]http://twitpic.com/cmzdb[/url] [url]http://twitpic.com/cmzeh[/url] - EQUIVALENT LIGHT [url]http://twitpic.com/cmzfi[/url] all with a large image warning
What, do you want hot XXX leaf-to-leaf action?
Do you mind me posting a picture showing you how to do a proper nature shot?
I'm just taking these hand-held and without any sort of srsbsns behind them (tripods, filters, other shit) so hey
Nothing special.
I posted it anyways, sorry. Your above pictures are okay for being only your 4th one. Keep practicing and just keep working with different camera modes, angles, and lighting. Soon you will be able to take really nice pictures. [media]http://photos-a.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs136.snc1/5816_1084530438086_1371148587_30202040_156810_n.jpg[/media] Here is one I took a few days ago. I used a Fujifilm Finepix S2000HD camera.
Yours is pretty much on the same level mogul.
It's nothing special, read up, take 1000, come back. [editline]07:06PM[/editline] Also fucking resize it god damn
Its an oversized Partial macro taken with a camera that has much, much more potential. In the dark With stock lighting No rule of thirds No contrast etc.
Rule of thirds doesn't apply to all art/photography. [editline]07:26PM[/editline] But if you're trying to say it lacked composition, then yes it did.
I beg to differ. Mine is not on the same level.
[QUOTE=leach139;16459325]I'm just taking these hand-held and without any sort of srsbsns behind them (tripods, filters, other shit) so hey[/QUOTE] No one takes pictures of flowers using a tripod, and I don't use a filter or "other shit" either. Don't make excuses, take criticism when it's appropriate (Here) and use it to make your next work better. [editline]07:50PM[/editline] [QUOTE=YoMother;16461545]|->Amazing | | | | |->You | |->Him[/QUOTE] Link me some of moguls stuff
Huh, I coulda swore I read the whole thread. Anyway, that's better subject matter than OP but either could be done with automatic settings from a person with minimal knowledge of what makes a good photo.
I used the shutter speed, exposure, and aperture. I hardly ever use automatic mode. Here is some more of my work... [media]http://photos-d.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs136.snc1/5816_1084528918048_1371148587_30202035_7232045_n.jpg[/media] [media]http://photos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs136.snc1/5816_1084528958049_1371148587_30202036_196100_n.jpg[/media] [media]http://photos-f.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs136.snc1/5816_1084528998050_1371148587_30202037_4989058_n.jpg[/media] [media]http://photos-g.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs136.snc1/5816_1084532158129_1371148587_30202054_43918_n.jpg[/media] And ya, as people said above just keep practicing and explore different modes.
I didn't say you used auto, I said you could replicate the results with auto.
Ya except it might not get the macro effect I got in some of the photos here.
[QUOTE=YoMother;16464272]Well it's pretty fucking hard to replicate anything with AUTO. Gettit? Auto? [/QUOTE] nno#
[QUOTE=Perfumly;16461575]No one takes pictures of flowers using a tripod, and I don't use a filter or "other shit" either. Don't make excuses, take criticism when it's appropriate (Here) and use it to make your next work better.[/QUOTE] Exactly. It isn't the equipment that makes the picture good. It is the photographer and what he/she sees in the subject. Next time go for some better composition and the better version is still over-exposed. Also, nothing against pictures of leaves, but they are pretty boring subject matters. It is perfectly ok to take a picture of a leaf as long as there is something interesting about it. Something that stands out.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.