before everyone starts whining about another dumb rps title
it's because you aren't supposed to look at RPS articles like this
[IMG]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/5716/ss20110514184451.png[/IMG]
but like this
[IMG]http://img580.imageshack.us/img580/710/ss20110514184510.jpg[/IMG]
newsbot on fp is basically an RSS bot, using only a link to the article + it's title on RSS feed
They still suck hard cock if you ask me.
[QUOTE=Djessey;29820644]They still suck hard cock if you ask me.[/QUOTE]
next time I want to know something about dick-sucking, I'll ask you
[QUOTE=Nexosz;29821728]next time I want to know something about dick-sucking, I'll ask you[/QUOTE]
Next time I want to know something about knowing something about dick-sucking, I'll ask you.
He's right though, RPS does suck
[QUOTE=The very best;29821908]Next time I want to know something about knowing something about dick-sucking, I'll ask you.
He's right though, RPS does suck[/QUOTE]
can't really see why. They post a lot of good articles, their style is awesome
RPS just doesn't fit the general population of FP. It's not because FP is bad or RPS is terrible - you can't really open golden lock with a wise, great book
(this is the weirdest analogy I could write but I hope it works)
I like them and they are entertaining
I really like RPS, even if their titles are occasionally confusing as hell.
RPS rocks simply because of their coverage of lesser-known developers and just games in general.
I thought this was going to be a Minecraft article.
[QUOTE=The_Marine;29823273]RPS rocks simply because of their coverage of lesser-known developers and just games in general.[/QUOTE]
If RPS rocks, I paper.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.