• Scientific Proof that thoughts can affect the world around us.
    12 replies, posted
-snip, just move on, this is bullshit-
the Institute of Noetic Sciences is a quack university centered around pseudoscience and is recognized by literally zero research journals as legitimate
[quote][url]www.davidwolfe.com[/url][/quote] "Scientific"
I wish this one would die already. Been hearing about this shit from all sorts of enlightened individuals since middle school.
[QUOTE=Mingebox;49291760]"Scientific"[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://cdn.davidwolfe.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Envision-750x750.jpg[/IMG]
Go into the actual article. They have supposed sources there...
[QUOTE=TornadoAP;49291798]Go into the actual article. They have supposed sources there...[/QUOTE] i'm not even sure YOU read the article. last paragraph: [quote]Unfortunately, this study can no longer be found online, so I can’t read it for myself. Also, Emoto’s work has been highly criticized by the scientific community. Biochemist and Director of Microscopy at University College Cork William Reville wrote, “It is very unlikely that there is any reality behind Emoto’s claims.” Reville noted the lack of scientific publication and pointed out that anyone who could demonstrate such a phenomenon would become immediately famous and probably wealthy. (Wikipedia)[/quote]
Since we are on the psuedo science train. [url]http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100276300/how-the-slender-man-myth-became-a-violent-reality/[/url]
[QUOTE=TornadoAP;49291798]Go into the actual article. They have supposed sources there...[/QUOTE] That lead purely to pseudoscience and conjecture
Welp, this is stupid. I fucked up. Might as well close this thread since it turns out this is just psuedoscience bullshit.
Mind freeeeeeeeeaaked! (Doesn't seem at all legit)
Why write your own misleading headline when you can just borrow the [I]blog post's[/I] misleading headline? [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Noetic_Sciences"]The "study" is from a noted bunch of quacks pushing woo.[/URL] And, the blog's right, [URL="http://media.noetic.org/uploads/files/Double-blind_water.pdf"]their own damn upload of the study 404s out.[/URL] [URL="https://web.archive.org/web/20150719063346/http://media.noetic.org/uploads/files/Double-blind_water.pdf"]But the Wayback Machine has it.[/URL] I wonder how many times I'm going to burst out laughing just reading the first page. [QUOTE]Interest in this topic has been rekindled recently by claims suggesting that intentionally influenced water can be detected by examining ice crystals formed from samples of that water.20,21 The specific claim is that positive intentions tend to produce symmetric, well-formed, aesthetically pleasing crystals, and negative intentions tend to produce asymmetric, poorly formed, unattractive crystals.[/QUOTE] :fap:
[img]http://foxcock.me/web/images/ShareX/2015_12/2015-12-11_00-49-44.png[/img] oh my god this website lmao
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.