should the United States switch to a parliamentary system?
11 replies, posted
well should it?
why and why not
Fuck no is the only possible answer.
Fuck no is the only possible answer.
Revision, revision, revision.
US Government should compete with private business.
A+ Thread with loads of info.
No joke.
[QUOTE=Hunterbrute;17350371]Fuck no is the only possible answer.[/QUOTE]
.
America uses a system similar of that to the Romans, the senate and all that I believe. Your government system seems really boring.
NO.
[QUOTE=Vasili;17350415]America uses a system similar of that to the Romans, the senate and all that I believe. Your government system seems really boring.[/QUOTE]
we had that one "you lie" outburst
the only excitement
There is a good role for a Parliamentary system. Ministers / advisers should be picked from the legislative, rather than from the corporate world, as is too often done.
The nice thing about the US system though is that there is a clear division between the three different branches of power, unlike what is found in the Parliamentary system.
Lets use Australia for an example: the Prime Minister is the head of the legislative branch, but is also considered the head of the executive branch too (as is the Governor General), entailing a less clear separation of powers, unlike in the US, where the legislative is formed by Congress as the executive being the POTUS.
