[quote]"The first is users should be able to access all legal content," he said. "Second, there should be no discrimination against content providers on the basis of commercial rivalry and finally traffic management policies should be clear and transparent."[/quote]
Sounds good to me - hopefully they'll keep those principles upheld.
Lol, this won't stop net neutrality, people will just encrypt their traffic...
Fuck. This. Shit.
I'm okay with this.
I don't think it will make a significant impact on me, but it will surely help sites like YouTube.
$24.95/mo up to 12 Mbps download!*
*Connections to non-premium web-servers up to 512 Kbps. Advertised rate tested with netflix.com.
Those greedy fuckers. How about they fix the poor speeds in Britain before thinking about smashing down everyones speed.
ISPs can fuck off, they're already some of the most annoying pieces of shit on the planet. I already get discriminated against for the amount I download, I don't want to be restricted to the websites some marketing guy thinks I should have access to.
All we need is for us to start an internet company. No idiotic commercialization. and better than it is today.
The day internet is limited to selected sites will be the day of my suicide
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
