Iran escalation 'could see UK forces sent to Gulf' - Polidicks

[release] An escalation of a dispute with Iran could see Britain sending military reinforcements to the Gulf, Defence Secretary Philip Hammond has said. Sending HMS Argyll as part of an international warship flotilla through the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday was a "clear signal" to Tehran, he said. Iran has threatened to close the strait in retaliation for sanctions against its oil exports. In total, 35% of the world's tanker-borne oil passes through the strait. Asked if more resources could be sent to the region, Mr Hammond said: "The UK has a contingent capability to reinforce that presence should at any time it be considered necessary to do so." He was speaking at a London press conference following the annual round of talks between UK and Australian foreign and defence ministers. The European Union agreed sanctions on Monday to ban all new oil contracts with Iran and freeze the assets of Iran's central bank in the EU. Iran said the embargo is "unfair" and "doomed to fail". Continue reading the main story Analysis Jonathan Beale Defence correspondent, BBC News The defence secretary has suggested that Britain might reinforce its naval presence in the Gulf as tensions rise with Iran. But senior officers in the Royal Navy will be scratching their heads and asking with what? Defence cuts have left the Navy with 19 frigates and destroyers. Five of those are currently in maintenance. With the Navy's continuing commitments in the Gulf, counter-piracy, defending the Falklands and home waters, there's not much slack. Added to that the Navy's two largest ships, HMS Ocean and HMS Bulwark, will soon be tied up with providing Olympic security. The two frigates currently in the Gulf, HMS Argyle and HMS Somerset, are due to be replaced by HMS Daring and HMS Westminster. The best the Royal Navy could would perhaps be to delay the rotation - and remind ministers that they don't have enough ships. The EU currently buys about 20% of Iran's oil exports. Foreign Secretary William Hague said the sanctions represented "a significant increase in peaceful and legitimate pressure on the Iranian government to return to negotiations over its nuclear programme. "Until it does so the pressure will only increase." International support Meanwhile, Australia's foreign minister Kevin Rudd said his country, whose exports to Iran have decreased, would also enforce the EU ban on Iranian crude oil exports. "It is not just that we endorse the actions taken in Brussels for Europe, we of course will do the same for Australia," he said. "The message needs to be delivered to the people of Iran, to the political elites as well as the government of Iran, that their behaviour is globally unacceptable. "This is not a piece of idle philanthropy on the part of Australian foreign policy, this costs. But it is a cost worth paying." Oil imports from Iran to Australia were now "negligible", he added. US President Barack Obama has welcomed the EU sanctions, saying they show international unity against the "serious threat" posed by Iran's nuclear programme. [img]http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/58057000/gif/_58057916_uss_hms_mideast_v2_464.gif[/img] A French warship also accompanied US and UK naval vessels through the Strait of Hormuz on Monday[/release] [url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16701013[/url]

tensions? you know would really ease tensions guys? [B]SABER RATTLING![/B]

At this rate... I say March or April is when all hell breaks loose.

I guess we're going to war with Iran folks

[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;34384044]At this rate... I say March or April is when all hell breaks loose.[/QUOTE] Probably. Obama pretty much hinted at war with Iran in his speech tonight

Because every decade really needs a war that defines it. Fuck yeah for mountain fighting. /sarcasm

For comical relief... [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHhZF66C1Dc[/media]

Welp boys, there have been some cutbacks on the matter of bombing Iran. [img]http://www.hitjokes.com/pics/Humour/Canadian_Air_Force.jpg[/img] On that note. MY BODY IS READY!

Yes, I hope all of you are good with having your tax dollars benefit you in NO WAY at all.

[QUOTE=JoeSkylynx;34384044]At this rate... I say March or April is when all hell breaks loose.[/QUOTE] I highly doubt we see any overt action in Iran before the election.

Hey guys, did you know that the whole "US Warships sailing through Strait of Hormuz" incident was in no way aggressive? US ships sailed out of the Strait so Iran could conduct naval exercises, and just sailed back in when they were done. Stop saying that everyone is "dick waving". If you look at the objective information, no one really wants to go to war [sp]except Israel[/sp].

[QUOTE=A B.A. Survivor;34384245]Hey guys, did you know that the whole "US Warships sailing through Strait of Hormuz" incident was in no way aggressive? US ships sailed out of the Strait so Iran could conduct naval exercises, and just sailed back in when they were done. Stop saying that everyone is "dick waving". If you look at the objective information, no one really wants to go to war [sp]except Israel[/sp].[/QUOTE] What is being said by world leaders makes it extraordinarily, though just read the bloody OP [editline]25th January 2012[/editline] [quote]Sending HMS Argyll as part of an international warship flotilla through the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday was a "clear signal" to Tehran[/quote]

I hope my brother doesn't get sent off there.

We're still trying to bring our troops home from Afganistan and on top of that we only just pulled out of Libya and Iraq. The last thing the UK needs is more war.

[QUOTE=Vasili;34385126]I hope my brother doesn't get sent off there.[/QUOTE] fuck, man i hope [b]I[/b] don't get sent off there i want nothing to do with that shit, and my buddy is on the abraham lincoln too, he wants nothing to do with that shit either. i could give a fuck less if gas prices go up another buck fifty.

I wish Britain would stay out of this.