• Daily Deal - Medal of Honor, 75% off!
    25 replies, posted
[url]http://store.steampowered.com/news/7167/[/url]
Avoid at all costs, serious waste of money.
Kinda stupid how they chose to have 2 completely different engine for SP and MP.
Still not worth it.
Amazon had this for $1.99 a few days ago if you used their $5 off promotion, activates on Origin, but if you were to buy this sad excuse for a game, buying it then would have been the best.
[QUOTE=ZeroS;34310051]Kinda stupid how they chose to have 2 completely different engine for SP and MP.[/QUOTE]It's a feature!
Mine as well be called TIER 1 TEH GAME. After looking at the fucking retarded trailers I can say this game is shit without even playing it
It's like the worst parts of Battlefield and the worst parts of CoD combined.
Got it from EA support for free and still not worth it.
Should have been a World War II game instead, might actually have been interested then. Or something futuristic, I'd have been fine with that as well.
[QUOTE=TDocter;34311376]Should have been a World War II game instead, might actually have been interested then. Or something futuristic, I'd have been fine with that as well.[/QUOTE] To be fair, the general tone after the release of Airborne (and every other game released at that time) was "oh gee, another ww2 game, do something else for once!" Then CoD did the modern warfare thing and that became hot shit, and I can only assume they started working on the modern Medal of Honor then, even if it was first released in 2010.
Airborne was so awful. I think the last truly great MoH was probably Allied Assault. Pacific Assault was merely just alright.
[QUOTE=The_Marine;34312212]Airborne was so awful. I think the last truly great MoH was probably Allied Assault. Pacific Assault was merely just alright.[/QUOTE] Airborne was great, what are you talking about.
This game is so bad its hilarious. Airborne was the last good MoH in my opinion
[QUOTE=SFArial;34312630]Airborne was great, what are you talking about.[/QUOTE] Retarded AI, gimmicky paradropping, extremely awful gun play, and really boring missions. Nevermind that it really suffered from serious consolitis.
Funny how a game that was cloned by Call of Duty now clones that game.
[QUOTE=The_Marine;34313069]Retarded AI, gimmicky paradropping, extremely awful gun play, and really boring missions. Nevermind that it really suffered from serious consolitis.[/QUOTE] Being able to start the mission from any spot that you can think of to land on is gimmicky? And awful gun play? Are you serious? It had like one of the few really good first person cover mechanics.
Yes, it's gimmicky because it never really mattered where you landed. The difference was merely one place had a ton of enemies and the other had a handful... and enemies were retarded and would more often than not kill themselves with their own grenades. And yes, guns were impossible to use thanks to insane recoil, huge and bulky iron sights, and terrible crosshairs. Red Orchestra is like the only game that I know of that did WW2 iron sights well, next to Call of Duty 1 & 2.
For a second there I thought they meant frontline.
Too bad it's shit, i expect it too be free.
there is no one playing MP now that there's BF3 which is superior in every way
Got the special edition for $70. :(
am i the only one who thought this game was alright?
The SP was alright but way too short to be worth buying.
The multiplayer is Bad Company 2 except not as good. I rather enjoyed the singleplayer, but I agree with simkas.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.