• Crysis 2′s Shocking Tech Compromise: Proof
    95 replies, posted
[url]http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RockPaperShotgun/~3/MtU2qy90Qfw/[/url]
Wow, I don't really care.
[QUOTE=markfu;28871884]Wow, I don't really care.[/QUOTE] Haha, look at all the people getting fooled by this article.
Wow, I need to read moar.
he even had to mention dx12 at the end just in case you STILL didn't realise it was satire. and yet, people still don't.
[QUOTE=Rusty100;28871926]he even had to mention dx12 at the end just in case you STILL didn't realise it was satire. and yet, people still don't.[/QUOTE] Oh god, I JUST noticed that too. Somewhat clever on RPS' part.
Uh, RPS, there are still 3 days till april the 1st.
I'm not sure my pc's flux capacitor supports broad spectrum resonance effects
I agree. When I played Crysis 2 my pc got 3°C less hot. Awful looking game.
Crysis 2's looks is Crysis with more detailed levels, that is all. although the lightning is actually superior. Crysis 3 will have that groundbreaking tech we all crave for.
[QUOTE=DrBreen;28872008]Crysis 2's looks is Crysis with more detailed levels, that is all. although the lightning is actually superior. Crysis 3 will have that groundbreaking tech we all crave for.[/QUOTE] One can only hope. Though there is hope if the big 2 would start the next fucking generation already.
[QUOTE=Rusty100;28871926]he even had to mention dx12 at the end just in case you STILL didn't realise it was satire. and yet, people still don't.[/QUOTE] Welcome to Facepunch. This happens all the time really. Remember that 3D device that made your eyes blink really fast? Yeah.
[QUOTE=Mister Royzo;28872055]Welcome to Facepunch. This happens all the time really. Remember that 3D device that made your eyes blink really fast? Yeah.[/QUOTE] to this day people keep falling for Onion news videos. and they're not even supposed to trick you.
If it looks better AND runs better, then it's better, no matter how the textures look when you look closer to them with a texture editor
This game is full of win.
I had a feeling that this article was fishy. I usually always agree with RPS and seeing them going all "graphics whore" made me suspicious. Good thing my senses were right.
What's going on?
12 joule range :wtc:
This is an amazing piss take of digital foundry
What?
I like how the numbers on the occlusion chart don't even match up with the chart, they're just randomly thrown on the bottom
What an amazing read that was.
-snip-
I actually read the whole damn thing, too. RPS, you so clever.
First, I though they were serious, but then I remembered this was RPS.
haha so funneh and edgy haha sooo funneh.
[QUOTE=BloodYScar;28873480]haha so funneh and edgy haha sooo funneh.[/QUOTE] haha so [b]STUPID[/b]
I love these [i][b]articles[/b][/i] [editline]asdfadsfsad[/editline] yes, articles, they can be funny, completely fake, silly this is RPS, not BBC
I'm a total idiot when it comes to know terms involved with computer graphics and even I knew it was satire as soon as I saw the first picture.
[QUOTE=BloodYScar;28873480]haha so funneh and edgy haha sooo funneh.[/QUOTE] Stop posting.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.