My study of the Exact force needed for procreation or how F = Ma is applied during Coitus.
5 replies, posted
It is a conundrum of intense debate of the force that a young man would indeed muster to reproduce with a woman of extreme attractiveness. Answers range from "The same force we hit Hiroshima & Nagasaki with in '45. " to "With enough force to rupture the space time continuum" followed by "would tenderly smash with force of a thousand exploding black suns, colliding with the hammer of Thor riding a black unicorn with a rocket stuck up the arse multiplied by the coefficient over9000 X 2 " and summed up by "the seismic reaction of the Earth caused by your mother getting out of bed."
Hyperbole aside though, there currently is no exact measurement to answer this trying question, or so I thought.
With the high degree of education caused by not falling asleep in my high school's physics class. I remembered newton's three laws and the often ignored 2nd one is what will be of much importance today.
For those who did fall asleep or are google shy or just clicked on random threads without reading the title, I'll summarize. " The acceleration of an object as produced by a net force is directly proportional to the magnitude of the net force, in the same direction as the net force, and inversely proportional to the mass of the object.
In layman's terms, big objects or big acceleration require big force.
In an attempt to measure this, I have done extensive research on the various sizes of human genitals. The average size of the male organ is 15.9 cm while the female organ has a combined 19.05 cm.
To estimate the acceleration of the F = ma equation. I took the size of the receiver divided by the size of the giver. But the acceleration must also take into account the thrust speed. Due to the high variance, 1 thrust per second should be sufficient for the calculation and shouldn't be too far from average.The final part of our calculation requires the mass of the giver since the receiver isn't required to move. The average American man weighs 168 lbs although these numbers aren't obviously universal.
Multiplying this with the calculated acceleration, the force used for each thrust is 147.16 N which is a 1:1 ratio with joules so 147.16 j/m for a work unit. This is assuming the thruster fully pulls out after each one, if the giver only pulls halfway, than the force is halved to 73.584N.
In conclusion
The Smash formula is genital size of reciever/genital size of giver * Thrusts per second * mass of giver to calculate energy exerted per second.
Sources of error in this experiment include ignoring air resistance, using newtons when pascals/pounds per square inch would be more appropriate, and writing this theoretical essay without any hands on experience.
Are there any questions or further criticisms of my essay?
Have you tested your hypothesis.
How about the exact amount of force needed to pull out? Would it be the exact same force needed for coitus, or would external factors make it big enough to crown a man the next king of England?
[QUOTE=Yahnich;49731930]well the more accurate form is dp/dt = F which follows from mv = p and dv/dt = a considering your fomula assumes acceleration is constant which is clearly not true otherwise a man would keep drilling inside a woman faster and faster.
"I took the size of the receiver divided by the size of the giver." also makes no mathemathical sense, having the ratios of female to male genitals doesn't make sense, instead there will be a constant distance travelled, a man cannot give more than his cock so all that matters is the size of the giver. also dimensional analysis of your formula gives m/s and not m/s² for acceleration meaning your theory is fundamentally wrong. My corrected formula gives m²/s which is again, fundamentally wrong. HOWEVER considering dp/dt does in fact use m/s you could incorporate this in your hypothesis
godspeed[/QUOTE]
Thanks,
The additional sources of error are ignoring friction, not using dp/dt = F and instead using a newtonian formula, having fundamentally wrong dimensions, including the genital size of the receiver when it isn't needed, and not rounding up test subjects to observe my experiment.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.