• Results of Prince William and Kate Middleton's sex life expected to appear soon for the second time
    55 replies, posted
[url]http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-32562117[/url] [quote=Bee Bee See]The Duchess of Cambridge has been admitted to hospital in the early stages of labour. Catherine was admitted to the Lindo Wing at St Mary's Hospital in west London where her first child, Prince George, was born in July 2013. Kensington Palace said "labour is progressing as normal" for the duchess, who was taken to the hospital by car.[/quote] He followed Garry's words and applied them: cum in Kate's vag until it happens. Again.
Fuck these weirdos. Who cares other than they are heads of state by default? It's a dumb system that should not only be ignored, by rejected.
I read/heard somewhere that this kid could put more than 1B£ back into the economy from publicity.. Let that sink in.
[QUOTE=Explosions;47643293]Fuck these weirdos. Who cares other than they are heads of state by default? It's a dumb system that should not only be ignored, by rejected.[/QUOTE] They are only being used for the British to remember that they are still peasants by mind and i guess it is the same for the other countries that still have kings and queens etc. But the most reasonable answer is that they still need something to gossip on really.
[QUOTE=Explosions;47643293]Fuck these weirdos. Who cares other than they are heads of state by default? It's a dumb system that should not only be ignored, by rejected.[/QUOTE] Should only be ignored yet you start with 'Fuck these weirdos'? Try not to sound too upset at the fact a country you don't even live in retains a powerless monarchy
It's weird how you're snidely remarking on "why this could possibly be seen as something newsworthy" when SH throws a collective shit-fit when some random computer game gets announced. Some people like talking about royal babies, while other people don't find it interesting at all. That's okay, opinions are part of what makes life so interesting, but it doesn't rub me the right way at all when people consistently groan and moan about people being interested in something that doesn't hurt you in any way.
[QUOTE=Explosions;47643293]Fuck these weirdos. Who cares other than they are heads of state by default? It's a dumb system that should not only be ignored, by rejected.[/QUOTE] Good thing the queen has little to no power, and is literally just a tourist and gossip attraction that puts millions into the british economy.
[QUOTE=butt2089;47643379]Should only be ignored yet you start with 'Fuck these weirdos'? Try not to sound too upset at the fact a country you don't even live in retains a powerless monarchy[/QUOTE] [editline]2nd May 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Explosions;47643293]Fuck these weirdos. Who cares other than they are heads of state by default? It's a dumb system that should[B] not only be ignored[/B], by rejected.[/QUOTE] [editline]2nd May 2015[/editline] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/fIh65.png[/IMG]
I wish I could be born to a rich and royal family. It's amazing how you can get everything or get nothing. What a funny world we live in.
I bet the baby wouldn't taste any better than any other baby
as a god-fearing American I feel it is my duty to denounce the new prince. don't tread on me!!
[QUOTE=man with hat;47643423]I wish I could be born to a rich and royal family. It's amazing how you can get everything or get nothing. What a funny world we live in.[/QUOTE] I dunno, I'd imagine it's a relatively unfulfilling life. Not much risk, not much to aim for, since you can just have anything you want, you wouldn't know how to do much for yourself like going to the shops or doing the dishes or whatever, you'd worry all your relationships are only related to your money. That's why loads of rich people turn to drugs, I'd imagine. [editline]2nd May 2015[/editline] [QUOTE=Explosions;47643293]Fuck these weirdos. Who cares other than they are heads of state by default? It's a dumb system that should not only be ignored, by rejected.[/QUOTE] What's weird about the royal family is, despite the monarchy being essentially dismantled, they are still technically really powerful. The queen has to sign every single act passed by parliament, and can technically refuse to do so, voiding any bill, but that's never happened.
[QUOTE=man with hat;47643423]I wish I could be born to a rich and royal family. It's amazing how you can get everything or get nothing. What a funny world we live in.[/QUOTE] Well in that case, forget about having a normal life, having security detail walking around you 24/7, you can't say whatever you want because you're part of the royal family, you have day to day affairs to run(being part of the royal family has jobs too), visiting people all around, going to fundraisers, meeting people, go on official trips, talking to all sorts of people. No thanks, I'll take my poor, miserable peasant life over being in royalty. Its no easy life once you are part of the royal family. Even the queen is working everyday now.
[URL="http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/may/02/duchess-of-cambridge-gives-birth-to-baby-girl-prince-william?CMP=soc_567"]It's a girl.[/URL] Let's get on with our lives. God, I wish Australia had the gall to do what the United States did in 1776 -- I'm going to be listening to irrelevant news about this for the next month or so..
[QUOTE=CrumbleShake;47643557] What's weird about the royal family is, despite the monarchy being essentially dismantled, they are still technically really powerful. The queen has to sign every single act passed by parliament, and can technically refuse to do so, voiding any bill, but that's never happened.[/QUOTE] Although she technically could, if she refused to sign an act of parliament she's out. She's de facto powerless. [QUOTE=Bradyns;47643902] God, I wish Australia had the gall to do what the United States did in 1776 -- I'm going to be listening to irrelevant news about this for the next month or so..[/QUOTE] But what about all those cricket games? Do they mean nothing to you?
[QUOTE=Explosions;47643293]Fuck these weirdos. Who cares other than they are heads of state by default? It's a dumb system that should not only be ignored, by rejected.[/QUOTE] If only. Lets rephrase. [QUOTE=Explosions;47643293]Fuck Obama. Who cares other than he is head of state by default? It's a dumb system that should not only be ignored, by rejected.[/QUOTE] You do realise we can't just topple the monarchy just like that more so than you can remove the president. Besides the Westminster system has effectively neutered the monarchy, all the Queen does is sign off on every piece of legislation and if she doesn't it will cause a constitutional crisis.
[QUOTE=codemaster85;47643407]Good thing the queen has little to no power, and is literally just a tourist and gossip attraction that puts millions into the british economy.[/QUOTE] That was already debunked by the fact that Royal Family upkeep is more costly than the monies coming in from tourist attraction and stuff
I hope they finally get progressive and call her Shaniqua, Tonya or even Cereal.
[QUOTE=Explosions;47643293]Fuck these weirdos. Who cares other than they are heads of state by default? It's a dumb system that should not only be ignored, by rejected.[/QUOTE] Yes mister American please tell us more about how European countries with centuries of royal history should reject an important harmless aspect of their culture, I'm sure your culture's numerous experiences with monarchy will give us perfect guidelines as to how to conduct ourselves in front of a royal family.
[QUOTE=Hamsteronfire;47643904]If only. Lets rephrase. You do realise we can't just topple the monarchy just like that more so than you can remove the president. Besides the Westminster system has effectively neutered the monarchy, all the Queen does is sign off on every piece of legislation and if she doesn't it will cause a constitutional crisis.[/QUOTE] The royal family can eventually be phased out (and probably will) in generations to come.
I literally only knew there was a second royal baby after looking at the TV today. Imagine being that kid when she's like, old enough to look back at when she was born and realise that the media kicked up a way bigger fuss over her brother :v:
Congratulations to them, lovely news.
[QUOTE=Dark RaveN;47643935]That was already debunked by the fact that Royal Family upkeep is more costly than the monies coming in from tourist attraction and stuff[/QUOTE] It seems stupid to me that whenever someone presents something and anyone rebukes it, like those videos I assume you're referring to, they accept the rebuttal no questions asked. No monetary value is ever placed on the Royal Family visiting other countries and their diplomatic duties, their philanthropy - supporting hundreds of charities including small business investment, employment support for young people, and climate change - or any of the other good stuff they do. And the alternative? More political shite.
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;47643956]Yes mister American please tell us more about how European countries with centuries of royal history should reject an important harmless aspect of their culture, I'm sure your culture's numerous experiences with monarchy will give us perfect guidelines as to how to conduct ourselves in front of a royal family.[/QUOTE] For all of Europe; Kings, Royal houses, Warlords have all come and gone and shifted drastically over time, and in early modern history (1600-1700) a lot of indigenous royal lines were deposed and/or killed and supplanted during what was effectively sectarian religious/ethnic warfare. The reason for having Royalty and Nobility ended when the feudal warrior caste ceased to have a purpose and vanished. Nobility birthright is a concept that should be placed firmly in the dustbin of history. Nobility may* be European culture, but it's by a fairly wide margin on of the most detestable aspects of it, and wholly irrelevant to the down to earth everyday aspects of contemporary and historical European culture.
I'm really looking forward to seeing this news shoehorned into every bit of run-up to the election.
[QUOTE=Bradyns;47643302]I read/heard somewhere that this kid could put more than 1B£ back into the economy from publicity.. Let that sink in.[/QUOTE] "I generate money just from being BORN!" Thats too ludicrous.
Let's not turn this into another royalist argument. They're a famous couple having a baby, it's made the news, if you don't think it's news, don't comment on it and it will eventually fall down the forums until it's DDT'd.
Congratulations for the two of them. I hope their child is healthy and is able to live a full and happy life.
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;47643398]It's weird how you're snidely remarking on "why this could possibly be seen as something newsworthy" when SH throws a collective shit-fit when some random computer game gets announced. Some people like talking about royal babies, while other people don't find it interesting at all. That's okay, opinions are part of what makes life so interesting, but it doesn't rub me the right way at all when people consistently groan and moan about people being interested in something that doesn't hurt you in any way.[/QUOTE] In my eyes anything that people care about is newsworthy, even if to a few people. The fact (crazy) people have been camped outside the hospital for weeks suggests that some people do care.
I find it ironic how much people over in the US cares about this.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.