New Black Panther Party coy on ‘rallies,’ ‘street maneuvers,’ post-Zimmerman trial - Polidicks

[QUOTE][URL="http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/new-black-panthers/"]New Black Panther Party[/URL] members are prepping for rallies and gatherings in the wake of the George Zimmerman murder trial, but are coy on whether violence, riots and other chaotic outbursts are potential — or welcome — offshoots of those events.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]But on the other hand, the group’s [URL="http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/twitter/"]Twitter[/URL] site is alive and kicking with fresh updates about a planned Sept. 7 rally to show solidarity with 17-year-old shooting victim [URL="http://www.washingtontimes.com/topics/trayvon-martin/"]Trayvon Martin[/URL] — complete with admissions: “We can’t and WON’T try to control the general dissatisfied population. For sure we are ORGANIZING.”[/QUOTE] [URL]http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jul/12/new-black-panther-party-coy-rallies-and-street-man/[/URL]

oh god [url]http://www.chimpout.com/[/url] was right

Yo I'd bet every cent I own that the washington times has never tried to paint a white political rally (like a tea party event) as a "potential riot".

What? There's a "new" Black Panther Party?

[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;41441650]Yo I'd bet every cent I own that the washington times has never tried to paint a white political rally (like a tea party event) as a "potential riot".[/QUOTE] Well seeing as the black panthers were historically a more militant-style group, I'd say their fears are at least grounded in reality. [editline]herp[/editline] Especially since this case has become racially charged for no real fucking reason, other than the media chose to portray Zimmerman as white in the beginning. This is also hardly a political rally.

[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;41441650]Yo I'd bet every cent I own that the washington times has never tried to paint a white political rally (like a tea party event) as a "potential riot".[/QUOTE] Maybe, but the "New" Black Panthers are a bunch of douchebags with nothing better to do than be ready on the attack if anything race related gets caught in their eye. Remember when one of those Neo-idiots was standing outside of a post office during the 2012 elections? [editline]13th July 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=-Rusty-;41441688]What? There's a "new" Black Panther Party?[/QUOTE] Yep, and they aren't even relevant.

[QUOTE=CommieTurtle;41441695]Well seeing as the black panthers were historically a more militant-style group, I'd say their fears are at least grounded in reality. [/QUOTE] Yo the I don't know if people have forgotten this or w/e but Tea Partiers regularly called for the violent overthrow of the US government.

[QUOTE=Big Orca;41441628]oh god [url]http://www.chimpout.com/[/url] was right[/QUOTE] Wow /pol/ was right about something for once, this is actually pretty scary. It looks like riots will break out no matter if he is convicted or not. I personally believe he is guilty of manslaughter for his irresponsbility. But he shouldnt be charged or convicted due to lack of evidence.

[QUOTE=Xubs;41441741]a few of the former members after the party disbanded decided to keep the name and make a "new" black panther party, this new version is hated by a lot of people and has been labelled as a hate group by the southern poverty law center and the united states commission on civil rights they're known for their anti-white and anti-Semitic stances on a lot of issues[/QUOTE] and the tea-party is super known for their anti-black, anti-gay stances. Again, I'm not denying that their rallies might get violent, I'm asking why they're being held up to more scrutiny than political rallies populated primarily by white people.

[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;41441752]Yo the I don't know if people have forgotten this or w/e but Tea Partiers regularly called for the violent overthrow of the US government.[/QUOTE] Actions and words are very different. Members of the new black panthers have been arrested for intimidating people at poll booths. [QUOTE=SigmaLambda;41441783]and the tea-party is super known for their anti-black, anti-gay stances. Again, I'm not denying that their rallies might get violent, I'm asking why they're being held up to more scrutiny than political rallies populated primarily by white people.[/QUOTE] First off, there's no reason to bring race into everything. Second, how about you actually compare two groups that actually fit the same description. Yes there are racists and bigots in the tea party, there are in just about every group, but the tea party isn't defined by racial hatred. If the KKK or neo-nazis were marching on Washington, I'm sure they'd be just as worried about riots.

[QUOTE=CommieTurtle;41441785]Actions and words are very different. Members of the new black panthers have been arrested for intimidating people at poll booths.[/QUOTE] A man flew a plane into an IRS building in 2010 dude.

[QUOTE=CommieTurtle;41441785] Yes there are racists and bigots in the tea party, there are in just about every group, but the tea party isn't defined by racial hatred.[/QUOTE] No, they super fucking are. The entire tea party narrative that Barack Obama was born outside the united states and is hiding his foreign birth is one of xenophobic paranoia whose entire foundation is on the fact that he is black.

[QUOTE=CommieTurtle;41441695]Well seeing as the black panthers were historically a more militant-style group, I'd say their fears are at least grounded in reality. [editline]herp[/editline] Especially since this case has become racially charged for no real fucking reason, other than the media chose to portray Zimmerman as white in the beginning.[/QUOTE] Yes, but not only that. The media sensationalized the living shit out of this case by turning Trayvon into a defenseless infant who was purposefully sought out and terminated by big bad "cracka" that is Zimmerman. They let that manifest in the TV sets of people across the nation, only to confuse everyone months later by turning it into a shit throwing contest by airing negative stuff about Trayvon (smoked weed, got suspended for it, posed with a gun in a photo,) then positive stuff about Zimmerman (saved homeless man,) and vice versa (making Trayvon out to be an innocent little boy, and airing more things about Zimmerman getting arrested back in 2005 over something.) Neither Trayvon nor Zimmerman were exactly innocent of anything in the past, but once they encountered each other that night, this entire thing turned into a mess of Black vs. White, as interpreted by those paying attention to the case.

[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;41441859]No, they super fucking are. The entire tea party narrative that Barack Obama was born outside the united states and is hiding his foreign birth is one of xenophobic paranoia whose entire foundation is on the fact that he is black.[/QUOTE] Alright you got me. You're right, they are, but they still aren't the same. The Tea Party doesn't march when black people kill white people, that's the KKK. And like I said, the case has become so racially charged that there's legitimate reason to be concerned (Rodney King riots, 89 Overtown riot, 09 Oakland riot, etc). Whether or not the riots are justified is not coming into question, but racially charged cases have a history of turning into riots.

[QUOTE=CommieTurtle;41442014]Alright you got me. You're right, they are, but they still aren't the same. The Tea Party doesn't march when black people kill white people,[/QUOTE] That's because when a black person (who isn't a millionaire football star) murders a white person the black person is convicted and goes to jail. They have nothing to riot about.

[QUOTE=Iago;41441776]Wow /pol/ was right about something for once, this is actually pretty scary. It looks like riots will break out no matter if he is convicted or not. I personally believe he is guilty of manslaughter for his irresponsbility. But he shouldnt be charged or convicted due to lack of evidence.[/QUOTE] You are just all over the board, aren't you? [QUOTE=Iago;41428813]Nah, those faggots were putting words in my mouth, all I said was that zimmerman is a idiot and should be charged with manslaughter[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Iago;41421428]He will be declare innocent for all charges. Good news is that my fellow black panthers will tear shit up. Teach those white knights faggots a lesson. This will be bigger than the LA riots[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;41442105]That's because when a black person (who isn't a millionaire football star) murders a white person the black person is convicted and goes to jail. They have nothing to riot about.[/QUOTE] You're missing my point entirely and I'm done derailing the thread. [editline]herp[/editline] There is no reason for race to have anything to do with this case, and it upsets me endlessly that all our society wants to do is become part of the shit storm the media wants.

The Washington Times article takes a lot of their tweets out of context and doesn't mention how the NBPP isn't interested in unlawful behavior. They are just saying they can't be held responsible for nationwide unrest, which is a reasonable thing to say especially considering the Black Panther's have been the scapegoat for racial unrest for decades.

[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;41442105]That's because when a black person (who isn't a millionaire football star) murders a white person the black person is convicted and goes to jail. They have nothing to riot about.[/QUOTE] Millionaire football stars are convicted too if they murdered somebody.

Did I miss a memo or something?

[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;41442164]You are just all over the board, aren't you?[/QUOTE] Stupid violent blacks! KILL WHITEY! Give Zimmerman a medal! #justicefortrayvon

[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;41441650]Yo I'd bet every cent I own that the washington times has never tried to paint a white political rally (like a tea party event) as a "potential riot".[/QUOTE] whats that you say? can't hear you over the shout of the KKK's riot or the Neo-Nazi's chanting. i bet they get all sort of sympathy from CNN and Obama though, even though they also put a bounty on zimmerman's head, harased his relatives, and threatened to kill him repeatidly before the trial [editline]13th July 2013[/editline] i have no sympathy for a group that decides to ignore the rule of law and resort to vilance, and assume anyone who's not black is always guilty of a crime. People like them exist just to stur the pot and breed racism