Their video blog of the process is pretty awesome. I recommend it.
30% of 15 = 4.5
Therefore I will now have 19.5 fps.
Love this patch, can't wait!
[quote=shit]“Overall we're running faster across all our hardware test cases, [b]in some cases[/b] with up to a 30% increase in framerate.[/quote]
So you mean, on one pc.
Keep in mind they're still not done with it yet. Expect that number to increase.
To 32%.
[QUOTE=Jocke;42418292]30% of 15 = 4.5
Therefore I will now have 19.5 fps.
Love this patch, can't wait![/QUOTE]
You sound entitled and ungrateful.
[QUOTE=Medevila;42419472]This game is absolutely unplayable on medium spec AMD setups[/QUOTE]
I'm on a medium spec AMD setup and I can play it fine. :/
[QUOTE=LEETNOOB;42419522]I'm on a medium spec AMD setup and I can play it fine. :/[/QUOTE]
same here, I haven't had a single problem.
I'm on a 2008 AMD card and I can play it fine
[QUOTE=Medevila;42420537]Specs?
I have Phenom II x4, 5870 HD, 8 GB RAM and an SSD and I get on average <20 FPS
I can only assume your definition of 'medium' is very different from mine[/QUOTE]
Phenom II 965 x4 at 3.4GHz, 6950 HD, 8GB RAM and a HDD. On average I get 30-40 fps.
[QUOTE=LEETNOOB;42419459]You sound entitled and ungrateful.[/QUOTE]
Why would you expect someone to be grateful for a game they can't play
[QUOTE=Medevila;42420562]That's frustrating to hear because I've tried literally everything with my setup, no dice
[editline]5th October 2013[/editline]
it might not be like this across the board but you can't pretend I'm alone in having these problems, all it takes is a quick Google search to prove otherwise
[editline]5th October 2013[/editline]
meanwhile on my laptop with an Nvidia 630M and i5 I get a playable framerate[/QUOTE]
What the engine determines is good specs to run the game smoothly and what is not is entirely up to chaos theory sadly
i.e. my i5 2500k with a 560ti runs the game silky smooth at max-ish settings and always has
Meanwhile a user on an i7 with an AMD card will never run higher than 15 FPS
my BF runs on medium/low using a low-end $100 AMD phenom2 processor at usually good FPS, though occsaionally it dips lower
I think the only certain thing is that i3s/i5's generally always run the game great and AMD setups (icnluding video card) tend to run into performance issues more often
I have a 4670k @ 4 GHz and a 760 gtx, running at about 20 fps in the slightly bigger battles. It's definitely not smooth sailing for many Intel/Nvidia builds either.
Intel Core2quad Q9550
ATI Radeon HD4870x2
8GB ram
I only experience almost unplayable lagspikes when all teams are battling over a small outposts with a vehicle gangbang.
But then it also gets nasty.
[QUOTE=Jocke;42418292]30% of 15 = 4.5
Therefore I will now have 19.5 fps.
Love this patch, can't wait![/QUOTE]
You seem to think that 30% is nothing to boast about. That's a big improvement.
[QUOTE=Brt5470;42424436]You seem to think that 30% is nothing to boast about. That's a big improvement.[/QUOTE]
Not big enough. If there are people with weaker computers than mine who can run this game at 60FPS, yet I can only run at a maximum of 20 then there's a problem. 30% increase won't solve that problem.
An improvement like that can almost be considered a placebo for people with performance issues.
[QUOTE=Mr.Cookie;42426208]Not big enough. If there are people with weaker computers than mine who can run this game at 60FPS, yet I can only run at a maximum of 20 then there's a problem. 30% increase won't solve that problem.
An improvement like that can almost be considered a placebo for people with performance issues.[/QUOTE]
Point I'm making is this is one of the patches they are releasing. It's not like they accidentally forgot they are rendering the game 4x more than it should. Their video blog of the process shows they are going through all the facets of the game and optimizing many different areas.
This is a good first start and they'll be improving it over time.
[QUOTE=Brt5470;42426389]Point I'm making is this is one of the patches they are releasing. It's not like they accidentally forgot they are rendering the game 4x more than it should. Their video blog of the process shows they are going through all the facets of the game and optimizing many different areas.
This is a good first start and they'll be improving it over time.[/QUOTE]
Better late than never I guess.
[QUOTE=Mr.Cookie;42426208]Not big enough. If there are people with weaker computers than mine who can run this game at 60FPS, yet I can only run at a maximum of 20 then there's a problem. 30% increase won't solve that problem.
An improvement like that can almost be considered a placebo for people with performance issues.[/QUOTE]
It's like you don't know how optimization works.
[QUOTE=l337k1ll4;42426415]It's like you don't know how optimization works.[/QUOTE]
Explain it to me then, I'm eager to see just how much you know of it.
[QUOTE=Mr.Cookie;42426401]Better late than never I guess.[/QUOTE]
Took them long enough to get to this state but they seem very dedicated to making it finally happen.
[QUOTE=Mr.Cookie;42426421]Explain it to me then, I'm eager to see just how much you know of it.[/QUOTE]
You can't just add a few lines of code and have the game run better. Watch the videos and you'll see examples of what they're doing, they have to go through the game line by line to find things to remove that will save them fractions of a frame per second at a time.
[QUOTE=l337k1ll4;42426431]You can't just add a few lines of code and have the game run better. Watch the videos and you'll see examples of what they're doing, they have to go through the game line by line to find things to remove that will save them fractions of a frame per second at a time.[/QUOTE]
When did I say I was expecting an instant solution? Optimization for this game has been a long time coming and it's just a couple of weeks ago that they actually really started doing something about. If anything, at some points the game's performance got worse.
[QUOTE=Mr.Cookie;42426449]When did I say I was expecting an instant solution? Optimization for this game has been a long time coming and it's just a couple of weeks ago that they actually really started doing something about.[/QUOTE]
They've been optimizing the game the entire time, it's just a few weeks ago that they stopped every single employee from adding any features whatsoever to the game and put them on optimization instead.
I'm glad they're making real efforts to optimize the game, it needs it soooo badly.
I hope they fix the clock desync in Windows 8, I still can't play without forcing my CPU to a constant clock in the BIOS
A 30% increase can mean anything. For all we know, they might be getting double the framerates on a certain AMD CPU and only 5% more on low-end Intel CPUs. More probably than not, they're just going to make the game smoother instead of cutting features down to decrease system requirements.
[QUOTE=Atlascore;42420722]A 6950? That's not medium spec at all.[/QUOTE]
It's p. much the same as a 5870, so, it's kind of medium spec, because there are other cards like 6990, 7970 and stuff out.
[img]http://tpucdn.com/reviews/HIS/Radeon_HD_6950/images/perfrel.gif[/img]
See how the 6950 is only 2% faster than a 5870? That doesn't make it high spec.
One thing I've found helps alot with FPS that I've done since beta was run the renderer at 88% "quality" in the settings
For me there is virtually no visual loss but a nice chunk of FPS gained
It also helps a lot to change PS2's priority to "real-time" in the task manager.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
