Court orders online critics' naming

[bbc]

[url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-25711932#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa[/url]

[Trooper34]

I get that you shouldn't be able to get away with slandering a company, but on the other hand I feel this can be abused to silence dissent.

[Missing User]

[QUOTE=Handsome Matt;43520652]Ugh what.[/QUOTE]

Freedom of speech is really only for speaking out against the government. Not against a private party. Writing a completely false statement about someone is slander

[Appellation]

…this will surely only be used for good

[itisjuly]

[QUOTE=areolop;43521329]Freedom of speech is really only for speaking out against the government. Not against a private party. Writing a completely false statement about someone is slander[/QUOTE]
I still think it is wrong to request names of anonymous critics. It should be site's responsibility to moderate the reviews.

[BLOODGA$M]

Lesson learned: If I'm gonna post negative reviews I simply have to do it behind seven proxies.